Skip to content

Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety of Biosimilar Etanercept (GP2015) and Enbrel

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety and Immunogenicity of a Biosimilar Etanercept (GP2015) and Enbrel® in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01891864
Acronym
EGALITY
Enrollment
531
Registered
2013-07-03
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2017-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Stable Plaque Psoriasis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of GP2015 and Enbrel® in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis with respect to PASI 75 response rate at Week 12.

Detailed description

The purpose of this confirmatory safety and efficacy study (GP15-302) was to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and similarity in safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel (EU-authorized) in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis and to evaluate the effects of repeated switching between GP2015 and Enbrel on efficacy, overall safety, and immunogenicity. Since only EU-authorized Enbrel was utilized in this study, the use of the term Enbrel throughout this report describes EU-authorized Enbrel only.

Interventions

DRUGGP2015 Etanercept

Sandoz has developed GP2015 Etanercept (Sandoz's code for the drug product containing the active ingredient etanercept) to be biosimilar to Enbrel.

DRUGEnbrel

Enbrel is used as reference product to GP2015.

Sponsors

Hexal AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sandoz
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women at least 18 years of age at time of screening * Chronic plaque-type psoriasis diagnosed for at least 6 months before baseline * Moderate to severe psoriasis as defined at baseline by: * PASI score of 10 or greater and, * Investigator´s Global Assessment score of 3 or greater (based on a scale of 0 - 4) and, * Body Surface Area affected by plaque-type psoriasis of 10% or greater * Chronic plaque-type psoriasis patients who have previously received phototherapy or systemic psoriasis therapy at least once or who are candidates for such therapies in the opinion of the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type * Drug-induced psoriasis * Ongoing use of prohibited treatments * Previous exposure to etanercept * Active ongoing inflammatory diseases other than psoriasis that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of treatment with etanercept Other In-/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PASI 75 Response Rate at Week 12 - GP2015 Etanercept vs. Enbrel ® EtanerceptWeek 12The 95% CI for the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response rate differences at Week12 between GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept. PASI 75 response: patients who achieved ≥ 75% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 75 responders. PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis up to theoretic maximum of 72.0, which means a higher PASI score reflects a higher psoriasis activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score up to Week 1212 weeksThe key secondary efficacy endpoint was the % change from baseline in PASI score up to Week 12. PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis up to theoretic maximum of 72.0, which means a higher PASI score reflects a higher psoriasis activity. Two approaches (longitudinal approach applying a Mixed Model Repeated Measures and Averaged Treatment Effect approach applying an ANCOVA model) were employed in order to calculate 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the difference between the treatment groups.
PASI 50, 75 and 90 Response RatesWeek12Percentage of patients achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75, and PASI 90 responses at Week 12. PASI 50 response: patients who achieved ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 50 responders .PASI 90 response: patients who achieved ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 90 responders .
Injection Site ReactionsWeek52Percentage of patients with injection site reactions up to Week 52
Immunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® EtanerceptWeek 52Immunogenicity was analyzed by the percentage of patients with positive anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to either GP2015 Etanercept or Enbrel ® up to Week 52.

Countries

Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GP2015 Etanercept
Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe. The drug is administered in a dose of 50 mg twice weekly for the first 12 weeks and 50 mg once weekly thereafter GP2015 Etanercept
264
Enbrel ® Etanercept
Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe. The drug is administered in a dose of 50 mg twice weekly for the first 12 weeks and 50 mg once weekly thereafter Enbrel ® Etanercept
267
Total531

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Extension PeriodAdverse Event004220
Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy000110
Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up002000
Extension PeriodPregnancy001000
Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject001240
Treatment Period 1Adverse Event / Injection Site Reaction440000
Treatment Period 1Adverse Event, Serious, Fatal010000
Treatment Period 1Lost to Follow-up100000
Treatment Period 1Physician Decision010000
Treatment Period 1Protocol Violation / IMP non-compliance110000
Treatment Period 1Withdrawal by Subject250000
Treatment Period 2Adverse Event001204
Treatment Period 2Lack of Efficacy001010
Treatment Period 2Physician Decision001000
Treatment Period 2Protocol Violation000100
Treatment Period 2Site Termination001200
Treatment Period 2Termination of Site000020
Treatment Period 2Withdrawal by Subject003411

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGP2015 EtanerceptEnbrel ® EtanerceptTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants18 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
254 Participants249 Participants503 Participants
Age, Continuous42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.86
42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.57
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
13 participants8 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
25 participants16 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
41 participants40 participants81 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
12 participants17 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
9 participants12 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
96 participants94 participants190 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
9 participants24 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
9 participants8 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
17 participants20 participants37 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
19 participants23 participants42 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
10 participants4 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants95 Participants202 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
157 Participants172 Participants329 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
97 / 16457 / 9660 / 10094 / 171
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1646 / 966 / 1007 / 171

Outcome results

Primary

PASI 75 Response Rate at Week 12 - GP2015 Etanercept vs. Enbrel ® Etanercept

The 95% CI for the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response rate differences at Week12 between GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept. PASI 75 response: patients who achieved ≥ 75% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 75 responders. PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis up to theoretic maximum of 72.0, which means a higher PASI score reflects a higher psoriasis activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The analysis of the primary outcome measure was based on the per-protocol set (PPS) consisting of patients who completed study until 12 weeks without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GP2015 EtanerceptPASI 75 Response Rate at Week 12 - GP2015 Etanercept vs. Enbrel ® Etanercept73.4 % of patients achieving PASI75 response
Enbrel ® EtanerceptPASI 75 Response Rate at Week 12 - GP2015 Etanercept vs. Enbrel ® Etanercept75.7 % of patients achieving PASI75 response
Comparison: PASI 75 response rate (proportion of patients showing at least a 75% improvement in PASI) after the first 12 weeks of treatment (Treatment Period 1) was the primary endpoint to assess equivalence between GP2015 and Enbrel®. Therapeutic equivalence in terms of PASI75 could be concluded if the exact 95% confidence interval for the difference in the PASI75 rates is completely contained within the interval \[-18%; 18%\]. A logistic regression model was to be employed.95% CI: [-9.85, 5.3]
Secondary

Immunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept

Immunogenicity was analyzed by the percentage of patients with positive anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to either GP2015 Etanercept or Enbrel ® up to Week 52.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The analysis was performed on immunogenicity set consisting of patients who provided data for ADA assessment of etanercept at baseline visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GP2015 EtanerceptImmunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept0 percentage patients with positive ADA
Enbrel ® EtanerceptImmunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept1.1 percentage patients with positive ADA
GP2015 Etanercept SwitchedImmunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept0 percentage patients with positive ADA
Enbrel ® Etanercept ContinuedImmunogenicity: Measurement of Rate of ADA Formations Against GP2015 Etanercept and Enbrel ® Etanercept3.5 percentage patients with positive ADA
Secondary

Injection Site Reactions

Percentage of patients with injection site reactions up to Week 52

Time frame: Week52

Population: The analysis was performed on safety set including all patients who took at least 1 dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GP2015 EtanerceptInjection Site Reactions8.5 percentage of patients with ISRs
Enbrel ® EtanerceptInjection Site Reactions16.7 percentage of patients with ISRs
GP2015 Etanercept SwitchedInjection Site Reactions9.0 percentage of patients with ISRs
Enbrel ® Etanercept ContinuedInjection Site Reactions15.8 percentage of patients with ISRs
Secondary

PASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates

Percentage of patients achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75, and PASI 90 responses at Week 12. PASI 50 response: patients who achieved ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 50 responders .PASI 90 response: patients who achieved ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline were defined as PASI 90 responders .

Time frame: Week12

Population: The analysis of this secondary outcome measure was based on the per-protocol set (PPS) consisting of patients who completed study until 12 weeks without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GP2015 EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI50 response at Week 1299.2 percentage of patients
GP2015 EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI75 response at Week 1273.4 percentage of patients
GP2015 EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI90 response at Week 1239.2 percentage of patients
Enbrel ® EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI50 response at Week 1297.9 percentage of patients
Enbrel ® EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI75 response at Week 1275.7 percentage of patients
Enbrel ® EtanerceptPASI 50, 75 and 90 Response Rates% of patients achieving PASI90 response at Week 1234.1 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score up to Week 12

The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the % change from baseline in PASI score up to Week 12. PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis up to theoretic maximum of 72.0, which means a higher PASI score reflects a higher psoriasis activity. Two approaches (longitudinal approach applying a Mixed Model Repeated Measures and Averaged Treatment Effect approach applying an ANCOVA model) were employed in order to calculate 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the difference between the treatment groups.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was based on the per-protocol set (PPS) consisting of patients who completed study until 12 weeks without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
GP2015 EtanerceptPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score up to Week 12-56.11 percentage differenceStandard Error 1.0578
Enbrel ® EtanerceptPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score up to Week 12-55.48 percentage differenceStandard Error 1.0511
95% CI: [-3.474, 2.204]
95% CI: [-3.61, 1.845]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026