Skip to content

Optimizing Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Adolescents

Optimizing Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01890954
Enrollment
17
Registered
2013-07-02
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2022-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), Closed Loop Control (CLC), Diabetes Assistant (DiAs), Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to use a closed-loop Control-to-Range (CTR) system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes in an outpatient setting, and to evaluate the CTR system's ability to significantly improve blood glucose levels when an insulin bolus is omitted for a 30 gram carbohydrate snack and when insulin bolus is insufficient for the amount of carbohydrates consumed for a meal. The primary objective of this study is to use a closed-loop Control-to-Range (CTR) system to significantly reduce the post-prandial blood glucose excursion in adolescents with type 1 diabetes who omit and/or under-bolus insulin for either snacks or meals. Up to 20 subjects aged ≥13 and ≤18 years old will be tested.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to use a closed-loop Control-to-Range (CTR) system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes in an outpatient setting, and to evaluate the CTR system's ability to significantly improve blood glucose levels when an insulin bolus is omitted for a 30 gram carbohydrate snack and when insulin bolus is insufficient for the amount of carbohydrates consumed for a meal. The CTR system is comprised of two algorithmic layers: (i) A Safety Supervision Module (SSM) which contains a predictive insulin request dampener (or brakes); (ii) a Range Correction Module (RCM), consisting in (a) a Hyperglycemia Mitigation System, and (b) Insulin on Board controller. Both modules will receive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and historical insulin delivery data. The SSM will monitor the safety of the subject's continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (CSII) to prevent hypoglycemia. The RCM will be responsible for optimizing blood glucose (BG) control and mitigating postprandial hyperglycemic excursions through a mix of increased basal rate and, potentially, isolated insulin boluses. To run CTR, we will use our wearable artificial pancreas platform, known as DiAs (Diabetes Assistant) which consists of a smart phone running CTR and connected to standard insulin delivery and CGM devices.

Interventions

Diabetes Assistance (DiAs) is a software residing in a Smartphone that contains the algorithms to regulate and control insulin deliveries (insulin bolus for: Basal rate, meal insulin and correction bolus) with inputs glucose values from a CGM and outputs insulin infusion by an insulin pump

Sponsors

University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥13 and ≤18 years old 2. Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 2 years as noted by the following: Criteria for documented hyperglycemia (at least 1 criterion must be met): * Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL - confirmed * Two-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) ≥200 mg/dL - confirmed * Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% documented by history - confirmed * Random glucose ≥200 mg/dL with symptoms * No data at diagnosis is available but the participant has a convincing history of hyperglycemia consistent with diabetes Criteria for requiring insulin at diagnosis (at least 1 criterion must be met): * Participant required insulin at diagnosis and continually thereafter * Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but upon investigator review likely needed insulin (significant hyperglycemia that did not respond to oral agents) and did require insulin eventually and used continually * Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but continued to be hyperglycemic, had positive islet cell antibodies - consistent with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) and did require insulin eventually and used continually 3. Use of an insulin pump to treat his/her diabetes for at least 6 months 4. Actively using a carbohydrate (CHO) /insulin ratio for insulin bolus adjustments in order to keep blood glucose in a predefined range 5. Tanner stage II or greater based on physician exam 6. HbA1c between \<10.5% as measured with DCA2000 or equivalent device 7. Not currently known to be pregnant, breast feeding, or intending to become pregnant (females) 8. Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study 9. Willingness to avoid consumption of acetaminophen-containing products during the study visits involving DexCom use 10. Self-reported behavior of snacking without insulin coverage or under bolus for meals 11. Willingness to consume a 30 grams snack without insulin coverage and willingness to bolus 75 % of usual treatment for an 80 grams lunch during both admissions 12. Willingness to remove home CGM for admissions if the subject typically wears a CGM 13. Medication stability in the preceding two months if taking antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication 14. Reported history of missed or inaccurate bolus treatments at meal time

Exclusion criteria

1. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) within the 6 months prior to enrollment 2. In adherence with the One Touch Ultra 2 User Guide, subjects with hematocrit levels below 30% or above 55% will be excluded. Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 12 months prior to enrollment 3. Pregnancy; breast feeding, or intention of becoming pregnant 4. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (based on resting blood pressure \> 95 percentile as listed according to age and height percentile in the Harriet Lane Handbook of Pediatrics) 5. Conditions which may increase the risk of hypoglycemia such as uncontrolled coronary artery disease during the previous year (e.g. history of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, therapeutic coronary intervention, coronary bypass or stenting procedure, stable or unstable angina, episode of chest pain of cardiac etiology with documented electrocardiogram (EKG) changes, or positive stress test or catheterization with coronary blockages \>50%), congestive heart failure, history of cerebrovascular event, seizure disorder, syncope, adrenal insufficiency, neurologic disease or atrial fibrillation 6. History of a systemic or deep tissue infection with methicillin-resistant staph aureus or Candida albicans 7. History of arrythmia 8. Use of a device that may pose electromagnetic compatibility issues and/or radiofrequency interference with the DexCom CGM (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, electronic pacemaker, neurostimulator, intrathecal pump, and cochlear implants) 9. Anticoagulant therapy other than aspirin 10. Oral steroids 11. Medical condition requiring use of an acetaminophen-containing medication that cannot be withheld for for 24 hours before CGM insertions until the end of each the study admissions. 12. Psychiatric disorders that would interfere with study tasks (e.g. inpatient psychiatric treatment within 6 months prior to enrollment) 13. Mental incapacity, unwillingness or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation 14. Known current or recent alcohol or drug abuse 15. Medical conditions that would make operating a CGM, the DiAs cell phone, or insulin pump difficult (e.g. blindness, severe arthritis, immobility) 16. Any skin condition that prevents sensor or pump placement on the abdomen or arm (e.g. bad sunburn, pre-existing dermatitis, intertrigo, psoriasis, extensive scarring, cellulitis) 17. Impaired hepatic function measured as alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase ≥ three times the upper reference limit 18. Impaired renal function measured as creatinine \>1.2 times above the upper limit of normal 19. Uncontrolled microvascular (diabetic) complications (other than diabetic non-proliferative retinopathy), such as history of laser coagulation, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, known diabetic nephropathy (other than microalbuminuria with normal creatinine) or neuropathy requiring treatment 20. Active gastroparesis requiring current medical therapy 21. Uncontrolled thyroid disease 22. Known bleeding diathesis or dyscrasia 23. Known allergy to medical adhesives, components of the insulin pump insertion set or continuous glucose monitor sensor 24. Active enrollment in another clinical trial 25. Use of anti-diabetic agents other than continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) including long-acting insulin, intermediate-acting insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors 26. Subjects with basal rates less than 0.01 units/hour RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF OTHER DRUGS OR TREATMENTS 1. Use of anti-diabetic agents other than CSII including long-acting insulin, intermediate-acting insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4, inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. 2. Acetaminophen will be restricted 24 hours before the insertion of not be allowed while the continuous glucose monitor is in use. 3. Medications that block symptoms of hypoglycemia, including but not limited to beta blockers. 4. Subjects on amylin analogs will be asked to withhold the medication during the outpatient admissions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Time Spent Near Normoglycemia8 hoursPercentage of time that blood glucose (BG) values (measured with both finger-stick and CGM) were near normoglycemia (70-180 mg/dL).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care First, Then Closed Loop Control
8 hours observational (09:00-17:00) during usual care with a missed insulin bolus for 30g carbohydrates snack (09:00) and an under-bolus (75% meal insulin with full correction insulin) for an 80g lunch (13:00). 1 day of wash-out. 8 hours using Closed Loop Control with DiAs with a missed insulin bolus for 30g of carbohydrates snack (09:00) and an under-bolus (75% meal insulin with no correction insulin) for an 80g lunch (13:00).
8
Closed Loop Control First, Then Usual Care
8 hours observational (09:00-17:00) using Closed Loop Control with DiAs with a missed insulin bolus for 30g of carbohydrates snack (09:00) and an under-bolus (75% meal insulin with no correction insulin) for an 80g lunch (13:00). 1 day of wash-out. 8 hours observational during usual care with a missed insulin bolus for 30g carbohydrates snack (09:00) and an under-bolus (75% meal insulin with full correction insulin) for an 80g lunch (13:00).
8
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care First, Then Closed Loop ControlClosed Loop Control First, Then Usual CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Time Spent Near Normoglycemia

Percentage of time that blood glucose (BG) values (measured with both finger-stick and CGM) were near normoglycemia (70-180 mg/dL).

Time frame: 8 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Closed Loop Control With DiAs SystemPercent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaPost-lunch (4 hours)42.3 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 9.2
Closed Loop Control With DiAs SystemPercent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaOverall (8 hours)43.4 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 6.5
Closed Loop Control With DiAs SystemPercent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaPost-snack (4 hours)45.1 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 8.7
Usual Care Without DiAs System (CGM Only)Percent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaPost-lunch (4 hours)16.9 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 7.4
Usual Care Without DiAs System (CGM Only)Percent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaOverall (8 hours)18.9 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 7
Usual Care Without DiAs System (CGM Only)Percent of Time Spent Near NormoglycemiaPost-snack (4 hours)21.3 percentage time near normoglycemiaStandard Error 7.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026