Skip to content

A Mobile Personal Health Record for Behavioral Health Homes

A Mobile Personal Health Record for Behavioral Health Homes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01890226
Acronym
mPHR
Enrollment
311
Registered
2013-07-01
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension

Brief summary

Poor quality of medical care is a major contributor to excess medical morbidity and premature mortality in persons with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To address this problem, community mental health providers are increasingly partnering with safety net medical providers to develop behavioral health homes, integrated clinics in which persons with SMI receive coordinated medical and mental health care. However, behavioral health homes have faced logistical and privacy challenges in integrating electronic medical records across organizations. This application proposes to develop and test a mobile Personal Health Record (mPHR) to overcome this problem while more fully engaging patients in their health care. The study will develop, test, and disseminate the mPHR. The investigators will develop the app building on experience and preliminary data from a PC-based PHR project, and link it to the medical and mental health EHR in a behavioral health home. Next, the investigators will conduct a randomized trial of the mPHR in 300 subjects randomized to the mPHR or usual care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMobile Personal Health Record App.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* one or more of the following conditions: hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes * able to give consent * patient in the behavioral health home

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Composite Quality ScoreBaseline, 12 month post interventionIt is a measure of quality of care. The aggregate score represents the total number of eligible services received for an individual generated by dividing all instances in which recommended care was delivered by the number of times a participant was eligible for the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating receipt of recommended care/services.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness CareBaseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post intervention20-item patient self-report instrument that assesses the extent to which patients with chronic illness report receiving care that aligns with the Chronic Care Model. The summary score ranges from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating patient's perception of greater involvement in self-management and receipt of chronic care counseling.
Change in Patient Activation MeasureBaseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post interventionAssesses a patients' perceived ability to manage their illnesses and their healthcare visits. Patient Activation Measure Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score then transformed to an activation scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater patient activation.
Change in Health-related Quality of LifeBaseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post interventionMeasured using the Physical and Mental Component Summary scales of the SF-12. Assesses a patients' perceived health related quality of life. The composite physical (PCS) and mental component (MCS) summary scores for the SF-12 are each scored on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

311 participants were eligible and consented to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Control or usual care group: had access to the full array of services offered through the behavioral health homes.
155
Experimental: Intervention
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive the mobile personal health record. Mobile Personal Health Record App.
156
Total311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: InterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous50.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.45
50.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08
50.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.76
Medical Diagnosis
Diabetes
68 Participants68 Participants136 Participants
Medical Diagnosis
Heart Disease/CAD/CHD
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Medical Diagnosis
Hyperlipidemia
72 Participants70 Participants142 Participants
Medical Diagnosis
Hypertension
134 Participants123 Participants257 Participants
Mental Diagnosis
Bipolar Disorder
43 Participants41 Participants84 Participants
Mental Diagnosis
Depression
116 Participants122 Participants238 Participants
Mental Diagnosis
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Mental Diagnosis
Post-Traumatic stress Disorder
35 Participants26 Participants61 Participants
Mental Diagnosis
Schizophrenia
34 Participants33 Participants67 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
118 Participants123 Participants241 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Race
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
156 participants155 participants311 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants92 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants63 Participants124 Participants
total annual income
$0-$5,000
86 Participants83 Participants169 Participants
total annual income
$10,000-$15,000
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
total annual income
$5,000-$10,000
42 Participants43 Participants85 Participants
total annual income
Did not answer
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
total annual income
More than $15,000
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1553 / 156
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1550 / 156
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1550 / 156

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Composite Quality Score

It is a measure of quality of care. The aggregate score represents the total number of eligible services received for an individual generated by dividing all instances in which recommended care was delivered by the number of times a participant was eligible for the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating receipt of recommended care/services.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 month post intervention

Population: Chart review data, which were used to assess overall quality of care, were available for all participants at baseline and 12-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Composite Quality ScoreBaseline0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
ControlChange in Composite Quality Score12-month post-baseline0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Experimental: InterventionChange in Composite Quality ScoreBaseline0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11
Experimental: InterventionChange in Composite Quality Score12-month post-baseline0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life

Measured using the Physical and Mental Component Summary scales of the SF-12. Assesses a patients' perceived health related quality of life. The composite physical (PCS) and mental component (MCS) summary scores for the SF-12 are each scored on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post intervention

Population: Completion rates for patient interviews were 91.9% at 6-months and 84.6% for 12 months, with similar rates of attrition in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS Baseline36.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.25
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS Baseline35.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.62
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS 6-month38.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.18
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS 12-month36.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.75
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS 12-month41.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.61
ControlChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS 6-month36.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.52
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS 12-month41.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.04
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS 6-month37.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.94
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS 12-month37.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.15
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS Baseline35.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.54
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 MCS 6-month39.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.48
Experimental: InterventionChange in Health-related Quality of LifeSF-12 PCS Baseline35.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.83
Secondary

Change in Patient Activation Measure

Assesses a patients' perceived ability to manage their illnesses and their healthcare visits. Patient Activation Measure Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score then transformed to an activation scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater patient activation.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post intervention

Population: Completion rates for patient interviews were 91.9% at 6-months and 84.6% for 12 months, with similar rates of attrition in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Patient Activation MeasureBaseline57.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.65
ControlChange in Patient Activation Measure6-month post-baseline60.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.18
ControlChange in Patient Activation Measure12-month post-baseline32.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.77
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Activation MeasureBaseline58.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.65
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Activation Measure6-month post-baseline59.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.89
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Activation Measure12-month post-baseline61.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.19
Secondary

Change in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care

20-item patient self-report instrument that assesses the extent to which patients with chronic illness report receiving care that aligns with the Chronic Care Model. The summary score ranges from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating patient's perception of greater involvement in self-management and receipt of chronic care counseling.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 month post intervention, 12 month post intervention

Population: Completion rates for patient interviews were 91.9% at 6-months and 84.6% for 12 months, with similar rates of attrition in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness CareBaseline3.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
ControlChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care6-month post-baseline3.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
ControlChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care12-month post-baseline3.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness CareBaseline3.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care6-month post-baseline3.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Experimental: InterventionChange in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care12-month post-baseline3.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026