Skip to content

TReatment by Insulin Continuous Infusion in Type 2 DIAbetes

Treatment by Subcutaneous Continuous Infusion of Insulin by Portable Pump Versus Discontinuous Infusion of Insulin by Multi-injections in the Type 2 Diabetes: Study of the Insulinosensibility in the 2 Types of Treatments

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01889914
Acronym
TRICIDIA2
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-07-01
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2013-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Brief summary

The aim of the TRICIDIA2 study is to compare two modalities of administration of insulin. In our future study, the investigators wish to study if the treatment by continuous infusion of insulin improves the insulinosensitivity of type 2 diabetic patients; the investigators indeed expect that the insulin delivered in a continuous way decreases the insulino-resistance of these patients compared with the intermittent delivering of insulin.

Detailed description

We wish to use before and after treatment the classic tools of measure of insulinosensitivity / the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp associated with a measure of the insulinosecretion thanks to a test of load in glucose IV. The coupling in the same procedure of these 2 tests is the Botnia clamp. We also wish to use the continuous measure of subcutaneous glucose during several days to estimate the reduction in the average glycemia on the fast and prandial periods as well as the decrease of the time spent in hyperglycemia during the day. This tool demonstrated its interest in type 2 diabetic population in several studies. Finally the current / spectro-IRM methods of imaging are now validated to quantify and measure exactly the importance of the steatosis, including in type 2 patients, because we know that it is probably the result of the insulino-resistance; We would also like to demonstrate that some genetic polymorphisms of proteins (polymorphisms G / T493 of the MTP, 1927 C/T of the receiver R1 of the adiponectin and 265 C/T of the gene of Apolipoprotéines A) are factors which can modulate the steatosis development in case of type 2 diabetes. In other secondary criteria we wait for an improvement of HbA1c, quality of life of type 2 obese people with regard to the treatment by intensified Multi-injections.

Interventions

DRUG2 different procedures of administration of insulin

Compare the efficiency of both types of therapeutic care in insulinoresistant type 2 diabetic patients: insulin multi injections (levemir et Apidra versus continuous infusion of insulin apidra by pump

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 18 years old * type 2 diabete patient with insuline basal/bolus treatment for at least 6 months * Doses of insuline \> 0,7 U/Kg/j * HbA1c ≥ 7,5% * without ADO for at least 4 weeks (sulfamides, Incrétines, glinides, acarbose) except the metformine * BMI ≥ 28,5 kg/m² * clinical diagnostique of diabetes for at least 10 ans * Patient must be able to Realize an automonitoring and to manage the functioning of an insulin pump.

Exclusion criteria

* glitazone treatment less than 3 month before inclusion * Patient with an untreated by the laser proliferative ischemic retinopathy * BMI \< 28,5 kg/m² * Pacemaker (CI IRM) * Presence of implantable material (CI IRM) * Pregnancy, breast-feeding * Practices of violent sports * Professional extreme environment of cold or heat * Serious psychiatric diseases physical and/or psychiatric Incapacitated medically significant * Poor sanitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
changes from baseline in insulinoresistance measured by biological tests of hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in the two groups of treatment 6 months after the start of the treatment.baseline and six months after the begining of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
change from baseline in the hyperglycemia time spent during basal and prandial period with continuous glucose monitoring tool at 6 monthsbaseline and six months after the beginning of the study
change from baseline in HbA1c in the two groups of treatment at three, six, nine and twelve monthsbaseline and three, six, nine, twelve months
change from baseline in quality of life measured with questionnaires at 6 monthsbaseline and 6 months
change from baseline in weight at three, six, nine and twelve months in the two groups.baseline and three, six, nine and twelve months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026