Skip to content

Individualization of Ovarian Stimulation Using AMH Maximizes the Benefits and Minimizes Complications and Risks

Individualization of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Using Anti-mullerian Hormone as a Biomarker of Ovarian Response Maximizes the Beneficial Effects of Treatment and Minimizes Complications and Risks.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01887652
Enrollment
250
Registered
2013-06-27
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2014-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

In Vitro Fertilization, ovulation induction, anti-mullerian hormone

Brief summary

The purpose oh the study is to determine the usefulness of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) to identify women at risk of excessive and poor response in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF), and the clinical impact of applying individualized COS strategies in these subsets of patients.

Detailed description

A group of 130 women undergoing conventional COS after pituitary down-regulation for IVF will be studied to determine the best cut-off points of AMH, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, to discriminate excessive (≥20 oocytes retrieved) and poor response (≤4 oocytes retrieved). The inclusion criteria is any patient with indication of IVF treatment. Subsequently, a different group of 120 women (with the same criteria) will be assessed using AMH before starting COS, and treatment strategy will be individualized according to AMH results (iCOS). Mild stimulation using daily doses (112.5 to 150 IU) of recombinant follicle stimulation hormone (rec-hFSH) or rec-hFSH combined with recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation (375 IU total daily dose) will be given to patients identified as at risk of excessive and poor response, respectively. It will evaluated: number of oocytes, clinical pregnancy rates (defined as fetal heartbeat on ultrasound performed 4 weeks after the transfer of embryos) and occurrence of Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome). Outcomes will be compared between the groups who received conventional and iCOS using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Interventions

a protocol of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH with dose according to age, ovarian size and previous treatment. In patients alder than 35, recombinant LH was added to ovarian stimulation.

OTHERindividualized ovarian stimulation

After defining cut-off points of anti-mullerian hormone, using a ROC analysis, to discriminate excessive (≥20 oocytes retrieved) and poor response (≤4 oocytes retrieved), a individualized protocol was defined.Mild stimulation using daily doses (112.5 to 150 IU) of recombinant FSH or recombinant FSH combined with recombinant LH supplementation (375 IU total daily dose) were given to patients identified as at risk of excessive and poor response.

Sponsors

ANDROFERT - Clinica de Andrologia e Reproducao Humana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women with in vitro fertilization treatment indication

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of oocytes retrieved1 day (on the day of oocyte retrieval)number of oocyte retrieved classified as: poor response: ≤4 oocytes normal response: 5 - 19 oocytes excessive response: ≥20 oocytes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical pregnancy rate4 weeks after embryo transferpresence of fetal heartbeat on transvaginal ultrasound
occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome4 weeks after embryo transferpresence of hyperstimulation syndrome during follow up after oocyte retrieval
cancellationon the 8th day of ovarian stimulationcancellation of the cycle because of no ovarian response (no follicles \>14 mm during ovarian stimulation)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026