Skip to content

A Control Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Ozone-therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B

Medical Ozone Versus Conventional Interferon-α Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B -A Control Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Ozone-therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01887275
Enrollment
439
Registered
2013-06-26
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2013-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

Chronic hepatitis B, Medical Ozone, Interferon-α, Efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of medical ozone in treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Detailed description

Total of 439 patients with chronic hepatitis B were divided according to patients' intention into two arms. 173 patients in arm I were treated with medical ozone therapy with humares which was made in Germany for at least 12 weeks.266 patients in arm II were treated with conventional interferon-α for at least 24 weeks.Patients in both groups were followed-up for 24 weeks.Virology response, biochemistry response and hepatitis B viral serological response will be studied at 12 weeks after the treatment, at the end of treatment and after 24 weeks of follow-up.

Interventions

Medical ozone therapy with instrument made in Germany Patients in this group will receive autohemotherapy treatment. First month: ozone concentration: 20µg \ 40µg /ml;The second month: 30µg/ml × 100ml oxygen- ozone gas × 100 ml blood;The third month: 20µg/ml × 100ml oxygen- ozone gas× 100 ml blood.

DRUGconventional interferon-α

Patients in the conventional interferon-α treatment group received subcutaneouslly injection of 5 million units of conventional interferon-α in three times per week for at least 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female; * HBsAg positive for over 6 months; * ALT over 2×ULN, TBIL less than 80 µmol/L.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of hemorrhagic or hemolysis disease; * Patient has any history of clinical signs/symptoms of hepatic decompensation or serious metabolic hepatic disease; * Patient is co-infected with HIV or HCV; * Patient is treated with anti-virus drug like interferon or nucleoside analogue in recent 6 months; * Patient is treated with immunosuppressive agent for long time, including patient has a history of organ transplantation; * Pregnancy; * Current alcohol or drug abuse; * Difficulty to draw blood through veins; * Patient has a history of carcinoma, or finding suggestive of possible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or AFP over than 100ng/ml; * Patient has a history of any severe physical disease such as cardio-vascular, kidney events, hyperthyroidism or serious electrolyte disturbance; * Patient is enrolled in any other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HBV DNAup to 77 weeksTo demonstrate the percentage of patients achieving HBV DNA\<1000copies/mL

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HBeAgup to 77 weeksPercentage of patients with HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion in patients with HBeAg positive at baseline.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026