Advanced Cancer, Jaundice, Local Tumor Spread, Metastasized, Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable
Conditions
Keywords
Advanced, metastasising pancreatic head carcinoma, Jaundice, Biliodigestive anastomosis, Endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage, Quality of Life
Brief summary
To compare the quality of life (QoL) in patients receiving a bilioenteric anastomosis vs. endoscopical stenting for palliation of biliary obstruction due to locally unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In the past, endoscopy seems to have been favoured based on older studies, but with new chemotherapeutic regimens available, the likelihood to experience stent complications has increased. Therefore, the issue as to which palliation should be favoured has to be reconsidered.
Detailed description
The aim of this multi-centre, prospective-randomised study was to compare the effectiveness of palliative applications on patients suffering from a local, advanced and/or hepatic, metastasising, non-resectable pancreas head carcinoma and jaundice. Before randomisation, all patients are fitted with an endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage endoscopically inserted. When postoperatively ascertained that the pancreas head carcinoma is non-resectable, the patient shall be electronically registered and randomly assigned to one of the palliative strategies. Group 1 will be fitted with a biliodigestive anastomosis. Group 2 will continue with the endoscopically inserted drainage. Regardless of which group they belong to, all patients will receive a palliative chemotherapy. The primary parameter is the average quality of life over a period of 6 months post-operatively, to be analysed monthly using identical questionnaires. The comparison of the randomisation groups will be carried out using a co-variance analysis (ANCOVA) with the initial value, taken directly before the operation, to be used as co-variant.
Interventions
PROCEDUREStent
Endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage
PROCEDUREBiliodigestive anastomosis
Biliodigestive anastomosis
Sponsors
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Adult patient with local, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and jaundice. 2. Performance-status of 50 or above on the Karnofsky-scale (see attachment). 3. Adequate bone marrow reserves: leukocyte level \> 3.5 x 10´/l, thrombocyte level level \> 100 x 10/l; Haemoglobin\> 80g/l. 4. Male or female patients, at least 18 years old. 5. Women of child bearing age must be sufficient protected against pregnancy (contraception) during and for 3 months after the end of the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Adult patients with focal, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and no jaundice; also no jaundice in their anamnesis and with no endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP)-induced intervention. 2. Pregnancy 3. Breast feeding 4. Contra-indication for gemcitabine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Outcome of Quality of Life. | 2 1/2 years |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The incidence of surgical complications and complications, with regard to the endo-scopic stent insertion, are further aspects that shall be examined in this study. | 2 1/2 years |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed