Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Steroid Injection Using Dexamethasone or Betamethasone

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Steroid Injection Using Dexamethasone or Betamethasone in Patients With Spinal Pain: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01885481
Enrollment
600
Registered
2013-06-25
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2016-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Neck Pain

Keywords

dexamethasone, betamethasone, epidural steroid injection, comparative effectiveness research

Brief summary

Particle steroid drug such as triamcinolone has been used widely for epidural steroid injection (ESI) treatment in Korea. However, Korea FDA recently prohibit ESI using triamcinolone, following the regulation of US FDA. Therefore, dexamethasone and betamethasone become only candidate drugs for ESI in Korea and the investigators are curious about the effectiveness and safety of both drugs due to limitation of information about comparison of two drugs in previous literature. So, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of both drugs and our hypothesis is that there is no difference of the effectiveness between dexamethasone and betamethasone at 2 weeks after ESI.

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

epidural steroid injection using dexamethasone

DRUGBetamethasone

epidural steroid injection using betamethasone

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. patients with spinal pain (i.e.neck pain, back pain, or radiculopathy..) 2. patients with informed consent 3. visual analog scale (VAS) is five or more in 10-point scale at screening 4. sustained spinal pain, regardless of sufficient conservative treatment (i.e. oral medicine, physical therapy..)

Exclusion criteria

1. age of patient less than 19 years 2. relative contraindication of epidural steroid injection, as follows: * pregnant or breast-feeding state * uncontrolled coagulopathy * suspected of active infection state * uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * previous history of adverse event related to epidural steroid injection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the proportion of patients with pain improvementbaseline and 2 weeksthe proportion of patients with significant pain improvement at 2 week after epidural steroid injection, with the patients' subjective satisfaction scale of much improved or no pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of adverse eventsduring 12 weeks after epidural steroid injectionincidence of adverse event during 12 weeks after epidural steroid injection
pain reliefbaseline and 2 weeksdecrease of visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 2 week time point after epidural steroid injection, compared to baseline at 0 week
disability improvementbaseline and 2 weeksdecrease of disability index (Oswestry disability index or Neck disability index) for pain at 2 week time point after epidural steroid injection, compared to baseline at 0 week

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026