Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Exenatide ER 2.0 mg Once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Exenatide ER 2.0 mg Once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN™ 3 - vs. QW GLP-1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01885208
Acronym
SUSTAIN™ 3
Enrollment
813
Registered
2013-06-24
Start date
2013-12-02
Completion date
2015-07-13
Last updated
2019-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Europe and North and South America. The aim of the trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly versus exenatide ER (extended release) 2.0 mg once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions

DRUGsemaglutide

One dose of 1.0 mg semaglutide administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once-weekly

DRUGexenatide

One dose of 2.0 mg exenatide ER administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once-weekly

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and on stable diabetes treatment with 1-2 OADs (Metformin equal to or above 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose and/or thiazolidinedione (TZD) and sulfonylureas (SUs) equal to or above half of maximum dose allowed according to national label) for at least 90 days prior to screening. Stable is defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose - HbA1c 7.0 - 10.5 % (53 - 91 mmol/mol) (both inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

- Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using an adequate contraceptive method throughout the trial including the 5 week follow-up period (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local law or practice) - Any chronic disorder or severe disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol - Treatment with glucose lowering agent(s) other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before screening. An exception is short-term treatment (7 days or less in total) with insulin in connection with inter-current illness - History of chronic or idiopathic acute pancreatitis - Screening calcitonin value equal to or above 50 ng/L (pg/mL) - Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) - Impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 per modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula (4 variable version) - Acute coronary or cerebrovascular event within 90 days before randomisation - Heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)Week 0, week 56Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 56.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Body WeightWeek 0, week 56Mean change in body weight from baseline to week 56.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 0, week 56Mean change in FPG from baseline to week 56.
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 0, week 56Mean changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 56.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)Week 0, week 56The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) was used to assess a subject's treatment satisfaction. This questionnaire contained 8 components and measures the treatment for diabetes (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings regarding treatment. The value presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)After 56 weeks' treatmentThe endpoint considered HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 mmol/mol) as per the AACE target after 56 weeks of treatment.

Countries

Argentina, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Serbia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Out of 146 sites selected for recruitment, 138 sites in 12 countries randomised subjects to the treatment viz. Argentina: 4 sites; Croatia: 5 sites; Finland: 5 sites; France: 7 sites; Germany: 7 sites; Greece: 5 sites; Italy: 6 sites; Netherlands: 8 sites; Serbia: 5 sites; Switzerland: 5 sites; United Kingdom: 6 sites and United States: 75 sites

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
Subjects randomised to semaglutide followed a fixed dose-escalation regimen for a period of 56 weeks. Subjects started with once-weekly doses of 0.25 mg for 4 weeks, then escalated to doses of 0.5 mg once weekly for 4 weeks, and finally escalated to 1.0 mg once weekly (maximum dose). Doses were not changed during the trial after the maintenance dose was reached. Semaglutide 1.34 mg/mL was supplied in a 1.5 mL pre-filled PDS290 pen-injector and was to be administered subcutaneously (s.c.; under the skin) either in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm at the same weekday. All subjects continued their pre-trial treatment of 1-2 oral anti-diabetes drug (OAD) therapy throughout the trial, unless rescue medication was needed.
404
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg
Subjects randomised to exenatide extended release (ER) 2.0 mg (Bydureon®) were treated with the same 2.0 mg dose for a period of 56 weeks. Exenatide one vial of 2 mg exenatide ER was supplied in a pre-filled syringe of 0.65 mL solvent and to be administrated subcutaneously (s.c.; under the skin) once weekly through out the trial. All subjects continued their pre-trial treatment of 1-2 OAD therapy entire trial, unless rescue medication was needed.
405
Total809

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyUnclassified3238

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSemaglutide 1.0 mgExenatide ER 2.0 mgTotal
Age, Continuous56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Body Weight96.21 kilogram (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.5
95.37 kilogram (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.46
95.79 kilogram (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.49
Diastolic blood pressure80.23 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67
79.57 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
79.90 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73
Fasting Plasma Glucose190.5 mg/ dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.06
187.5 mg/ dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.41
189.0 mg/ dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.74
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)8.36 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
8.33 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
8.35 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
Patient-reported outcome: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)27.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.55
27.23 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.62
27.29 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Sex: Female, Male
Female
185 Participants177 Participants362 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
219 Participants228 Participants447 Participants
Systolic blood pressure133.35 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.87
133.66 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
133.51 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.55

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
194 / 404187 / 405
serious
Total, serious adverse events
38 / 40424 / 405

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 56.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-1.54 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.06
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-0.92 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: The post-baseline responses were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.8, -0.44]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The post-baseline responses were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.8, -0.44]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Mean change in body weight from baseline to week 56.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight-5.63 kilogramsStandard Error 0.29
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight-1.85 kilogramsStandard Error 0.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Mean change in FPG from baseline to week 56.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-51.22 mg/dLStandard Error 2.36
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-36.1 mg/dLStandard Error 2.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) was used to assess a subject's treatment satisfaction. This questionnaire contained 8 components and measures the treatment for diabetes (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings regarding treatment. The value presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)4.98 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)3.96 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 56.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure-1.0 mm HgStandard Error 0.45
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure-4.6 mm HgStandard Error 0.68
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure-2.23 mm HgStandard Error 0.7
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgChange From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure-0.1 mm HgStandard Error 0.46
Secondary

Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)

The endpoint considered HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 mmol/mol) as per the AACE target after 56 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: After 56 weeks' treatment

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects who had received at least one dose of randomised semaglutide 1.0 mg or exenatide ER 2.0 mg.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)Yes190 Participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)No214 Participants
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)Yes89 Participants
Exenatide ER 2.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target: (Yes/no)No316 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026