Skip to content

Phase III, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Different HBV Vaccination Schemes in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis

Open-label, Phase III, Randomized, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Different Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Vaccination Schemes in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis Candidates to Liver Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01884415
Enrollment
112
Registered
2013-06-24
Start date
2012-09-07
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis B, Cirrhosis, Awaiting Organ Transplant

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the response rate obtained with two different vaccination schemes against HBV in cirrhotic patients. These patients must be candidates for liver transplantation, who have failed seroconversion (anti-HBs \< 10 IU/ml) after three intramuscular doses of 40 µg.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHBV vaccine

Patients receive a second cycle of vaccination

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Cirrhotic patients, potential candidates for liver transplantation, with indication to HBV vaccination (HBsAg negative and anti-HBs negative). 2. Patients under treatment with HBVAXPRO® who do not show a response after the first cycle of vaccination of three intramuscular doses of 40 µg at 0, 1 and 2 months. 3. Patients over 18 years old. 4. Negative pregnancy test. 5. Patients who have given their consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Absolute contraindication to HBV vaccine. 2. Medical history of allergy to any component of the vaccine. 3. Chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. 4. Presence of antibodies against Human Immunodeficiency Virus. 5. Patients with seroconversion (anti-HBs \> 10 IU /ml) after the first three doses of vaccine. 6. Lack of consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-vaccination serological responseAt 35 ± 5 days after administrationTo compare the response rate obtained with two different vaccination schemes against HBV in cirrhotic patients potential candidates for liver transplantation, who have failed seroconversion (anti-HBs \< 10 IU/ml) after three intramuscular doses of 40 µg at 0, 1 and 2 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association of serological response to HBV vaccination to etiology and severity of cirrhosisAfter 6 monthsEtiology and severity of cirrhosis
Association of serological response to HBV vaccination to diabetes presenceAfter 6 monthsDiabetes
Association of serological response to HBV vaccination to body mass indexAt baselineBody mass index
Association of serological response to HBV vaccination to anti-Hepatitis B core antigen positive presenceAt baselinePresence of anti-Hepatitis B core antigen positive
Association of serological response to HBV vaccination to obesityAfter 6 monthsObesity

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026