Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
patient centered care, physical activity, behavioral activation, self efficacy, serious mental illness
Brief summary
Individuals with serious mental illness have greater morbidity from physical illness and mortality than the general population, but tend not to initiate or sustain engagement in health promotion interventions. Although promising weight management and wellness interventions have been developed for this population, they are very intensive and tend to have low enrollment, high attrition, and low reach. This pilot study will investigate a novel low-demand intervention that may be initially more acceptable, the Get Moving and Get Well! (GMGW) program. The primary objectives of the proposed study are to investigate the effects of participation in the GMGW program on measures of behavioral activation, self-efficacy, physical activity, general physical and mental health, mood, participants' intent to engage in more intensive physical health interventions, and actual engagement in those programs. Results of this pilot study will inform a future full-scale study of GMGW.
Detailed description
Anticipated Impacts on Veteran's Healthcare: Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have greater physical illness morbidity and mortality than the general population, but typically do not enroll in nor complete health promotion interventions. This pilot study will provide preliminary evaluation of a low-demand physical activity intervention that may be acceptable to Veterans with SMI and lead to improved health in this medically vulnerable population. Project Background: The relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality found among individuals with SMI have led to prioritization by Mental Health QUERI, and other groups, of prevention and health promotion in addition to improved coordination of physical health care for this population. Although promising health promotion interventions have been developed, they are intensive and none seem to successfully address the challenge of improving reach and enrollment while minimizing attrition. We propose to conduct a pilot evaluation of a novel low-demand intervention that may be an acceptable introduction to health promotion, the Get Moving and Get Well! (GMGW) program. Participants in the current version of GMGW have described benefits beyond those expected. We believe a 12-week GMGW program may be an effective and relatively low-demand intervention to promote self-efficacy and physical health in Veterans with SMI through increasing Veteran behavioral activation. Project Objectives: The objectives of the proposed study are to: (a) determine the effects of participation in the 12-week GMGW program on a measure of behavioral activation; (b) determine the effects of GMGW on measures of self-efficacy, physical activity, general physical and mental health, and mood; and (c) determine the effects of participation in the class on measures of intent to engage and actual engagement in more intensive physical health programs. Project Methods: In order to inform a future full scale study, we will complete the development of a 12-week manualized GMGW class, assess its acceptability, feasibility and time burden, and evaluate effects of the intervention on key outcome measures. To achieve the aims of the study, we will randomly assign 30 participants to either GMGW or an attention control condition. Participants will complete baseline measures investigating behavioral activation, self-efficacy, physical activity, physical and emotional health, mood, and intent to engage in health promotion activities before beginning the class. These measures will be repeated at the end of the 12-week class, along with questions investigating the acceptability of the interventions. A chart review will investigate actual engagement in health promotion interventions. We will be looking for the emergence of trends for differences in expected directions and response patterns within and between groups that will inform us about effect sizes for the measures and permit a power analysis for the full scale trial. We plan to use repeated measures analysis of variance, controlling for any variables that differ significantly between the intervention and control groups, to test the hypothesis that GMGW participants will have greater improvements on the measures at the end of the 12-week intervention than the control participants. Finally, we will also compare the number of participants who have evidence of participation in new health promotion activities in their medical record using a chi-square test of equal proportions.
Interventions
Walking Class
Class about the role of humor in health
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* To be considered for participation, potential participants must be Veterans at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. * They must express an interest in improving their physical health but not be referred to MOVE! at the time of enrollment in the study; * not have attended more than six class sessions of GMGW in the past; agree to be randomized to one of two treatment groups (GMGW or control health promotion class); * be between the ages of 18 and 65; speak and understand English; * and be able to increase walking and light to moderate physical activity as indicated by a progress note by their primary care provider. * Participants must meet PRRC admission criteria for serious mental illness (primary diagnosis of psychotic disorders, * bipolar disorder, major depression and/or severe PTSD) and * dysfunction (Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score of 50 or less); this will be assessed though a review of the Veteran's CPRS electronic record.
Exclusion criteria
* We will exclude Veterans who have been found to be legally incompetent or have a legal guardian of person.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Baseline (Time point 0 - Pre intervention/control class) and follow-up (Time point Week 12 - after completion of intervention/attention control class) | The BADS asks respondents to rate how much the statements are true for four subscales: Activation, Avoidance/Rumination, Work/School Impairment, and Social Impairment. It has been found to have acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of .87), test-retest reliability (Pearson's r = .74), good construct validity, and when administered to a clinically depressed sample, the factors held up. Items for each subscale are summed to generate subscale scores. The BADS is made up of 25 questions with response option range from 0 (not at all) to 6 (completely). (Subscore Ranges: Activation: 0-108, Avoidance/Rumination: 0-102, Work/School Impairment: 0-120, Social Impairment: 0-120 Total: 0-150). For all subscales, high scores are consistent with the scale name. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency | baseline and 12 week follow-up | Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a six point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly). |
| Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) | Baseline and Follow -up | The VR-12 is based on the Veterans RAND 36 (SF-36) and has been shown to be a good outcome measure of general physical and mental health with significant correlations with morbidity (Kazis, et al., 2006). It provides physical and mental health subscale scores. It consists of 12 questions (several with sub sections) which are rated on three point and five point likert-type scales. These ratings are then assigned values with some scored opposite so that higher values always indicate more positive health. The Physical Health component can range from 10-59 and the Mental Health component from 6-33. |
| Change in Personal Health Information Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | Baseline and Follow-up | Depression will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) which has been validated across several populations (Kroenke & Spitzer, 2002). Respondents rate how often they were bothered by eight problems on a likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores can range from 0-24; higher scores indicate higher levels of depression with score \>10 indicating clinically relevant depression. |
| Change in Intent to Engage | Baseline and Follow-up | Intent to engage in health promotion was measured with an established scale (Ajzen, 1991) adapted for this project. The Intent To Engage questionnaire consists of eight questions each assessing assess intent, confidence and social support to complete health promotion activities. Each of these is rated on a likert-type scale ranging from 1-7 with some responses reverse scored so that higher responses indicate better intent, confidence, and social support. These are summed for a total score. Total scores range from 24 to 56. |
| Acceptability | follow-up | Measure of Patient self-report of acceptability of intervention. Participants responded to four questions using a 7 (0-7) point likert-type scale with higher ratings indicating higher acceptability. These were summed for a total score ranging from 0-28. |
| Change in Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire | Baseline (Time point 0 - Pre intervention/control class) and follow-up (Time point Week 12 - after completion of intervention/attention control class) | Based on the exercise self-efficacy factors of resisting relapse and making time for exercise, the Exercise Self-Efficacy questionnaire asks respondents to circle how confident they are about their ability to exercise under difficult conditions, such as when I am tired. An additional item will be added to include hot weather as a possible barrier to physical activity, because of the likelihood of high spring and summer temperatures in our location. This scale was found to be highly reliable (test-retest reliability was .90) (Markus et al., 1992). It is made up of six questions each on a likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 7 (very confident). These are ratings are then summed for the total score; total score ranges from 6-42 with higher scores indicating higher exercise self efficacy. |
| Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Duration | baseline and 12 week follow-up | Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1 - 6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly). |
| Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Activity Frequency | baseline and 12 week follow-up | Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1-6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly). |
| Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Duration | baseline and 12 week follow-up | Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1-6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly). |
| Number of Participants Beginning New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | Start of class through 3 months post-class | A chart review was completed in order to identify documentation of new health behaviors. Mental health notes were first reviewed and then key terms were searched in all notes during the time period. S We considered a new health behaviors as: Starting or increasing physical activity in a formal program; Starting or increasing physical activity on own; Starting nicotine replacement/report cutting down or quitting smoking/join a smoking cessation group; Treatment for alcohol or SA/Report cutting down on Alcohol use; Report changing diet/formal nutrition consult/etc. Chart abstractors were instructed to make free text notes explaining each event the counted. These were reviewed by the PI for accuracy. |
| New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | Start of class through 3 months post-class | A chart review was completed in order to identify documentation of new health behaviors. Mental health notes were first reviewed and then key terms were searched in all notes during the time period. S We considered a new health behaviors as: Starting or increasing physical activity in a formal program; Starting or increasing physical activity on own; Starting nicotine replacement/report cutting down or quitting smoking/join a smoking cessation group; Treatment for alcohol or SA/Report cutting down on Alcohol use; Report changing diet/formal nutrition consult/etc. Chart abstractors were instructed to make free text notes explaining each event the counted. These were reviewed by the PI for accuracy. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well Walking class developed for Veterans with serious mental illness and administered as part of the PRRC
Get Moving and Get Well: Walking Class | 10 |
| Health and Humor Class Equally engaging attention control condition
Health and Humor Class: Class about the role of humor in health | 10 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Get Moving and Get Well | Health and Humor Class | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 55.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77 | 54.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 54.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American | 4 participants | 4 participants | 8 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian (Non-Hispanic) | 6 participants | 6 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 participants | 10 participants | 20 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Years of Education Bachelors Degree | 2 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants |
| Years of Education Graduate Degree | 0 participants | 2 participants | 2 participants |
| Years of Education HighSchool/GED | 4 participants | 4 participants | 8 participants |
| Years of Education Some COllege | 4 participants | 2 participants | 6 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 13 | 1 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 13 | 1 / 14 |
Outcome results
Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale
The BADS asks respondents to rate how much the statements are true for four subscales: Activation, Avoidance/Rumination, Work/School Impairment, and Social Impairment. It has been found to have acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of .87), test-retest reliability (Pearson's r = .74), good construct validity, and when administered to a clinically depressed sample, the factors held up. Items for each subscale are summed to generate subscale scores. The BADS is made up of 25 questions with response option range from 0 (not at all) to 6 (completely). (Subscore Ranges: Activation: 0-108, Avoidance/Rumination: 0-102, Work/School Impairment: 0-120, Social Impairment: 0-120 Total: 0-150). For all subscales, high scores are consistent with the scale name.
Time frame: Baseline (Time point 0 - Pre intervention/control class) and follow-up (Time point Week 12 - after completion of intervention/attention control class)
Population: Analysis population includes participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Activation | 1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.11 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Avoidance/Rumination | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.25 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Work/School Impairment | 4.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.27 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Total Score | 12.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.99 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Social Impairment | 3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Social Impairment | 1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Activation | 1.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Avoidance/Rumination | 3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.76 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Total Score | 6.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.31 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale | Work/School Impairment | 12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.05 |
Acceptability
Measure of Patient self-report of acceptability of intervention. Participants responded to four questions using a 7 (0-7) point likert-type scale with higher ratings indicating higher acceptability. These were summed for a total score ranging from 0-28.
Time frame: follow-up
Population: participants who completed follow-up measures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Acceptability | 23.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.72 |
| Health and Humor Class | Acceptability | 20.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Activity Frequency
Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1-6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly).
Time frame: baseline and 12 week follow-up
Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Activity Frequency | -0.7 times/week | Standard Deviation 5.48 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Activity Frequency | -2.0 times/week | Standard Deviation 5.33 |
Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Duration
Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1-6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly).
Time frame: baseline and 12 week follow-up
Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Duration | -0.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.72 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Cognitive Duration | 1.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.12 |
Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Duration
Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a 1 - 6 point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly).
Time frame: baseline and 12 week follow-up
Population: participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Duration | 1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Duration | 1.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.06 |
Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency
Physical activity and cognitive/social activity will be measured by the CHAMPS (Stewart, et al., 2001) which asks respondents to identify if they participated in an activity (yes or no) how many times a week they participated (continuous variable) and if they did participate, for how many hours per week (rated on a six point scale ranging from less than one hour to more than 9 hours). The CHAMPS assesses for both physical and social/cognitive activities (e.g., Visit with friends or family (other than those you live with); walk briskly).
Time frame: baseline and 12 week follow-up
Population: Participants who completed baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency | Physical Activity Frequency | 2.7 times per week | Standard Deviation 11.84 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency | Moderate Physical Activity Frequency | 1.3 times per week | Standard Deviation 5.42 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency | Physical Activity Frequency | 4.3 times per week | Standard Deviation 7.53 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in CHAMPS (Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors) Questionnaire for Older Adults - Physical Activity Frequency | Moderate Physical Activity Frequency | 2.1 times per week | Standard Deviation 3.51 |
Change in Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Based on the exercise self-efficacy factors of resisting relapse and making time for exercise, the Exercise Self-Efficacy questionnaire asks respondents to circle how confident they are about their ability to exercise under difficult conditions, such as when I am tired. An additional item will be added to include hot weather as a possible barrier to physical activity, because of the likelihood of high spring and summer temperatures in our location. This scale was found to be highly reliable (test-retest reliability was .90) (Markus et al., 1992). It is made up of six questions each on a likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 7 (very confident). These are ratings are then summed for the total score; total score ranges from 6-42 with higher scores indicating higher exercise self efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline (Time point 0 - Pre intervention/control class) and follow-up (Time point Week 12 - after completion of intervention/attention control class)
Population: Analysis population includes participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire | 1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire | .6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
Change in Intent to Engage
Intent to engage in health promotion was measured with an established scale (Ajzen, 1991) adapted for this project. The Intent To Engage questionnaire consists of eight questions each assessing assess intent, confidence and social support to complete health promotion activities. Each of these is rated on a likert-type scale ranging from 1-7 with some responses reverse scored so that higher responses indicate better intent, confidence, and social support. These are summed for a total score. Total scores range from 24 to 56.
Time frame: Baseline and Follow-up
Population: Participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Intent to Engage | -1.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.99 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Intent to Engage | 3.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.17 |
Change in Personal Health Information Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
Depression will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) which has been validated across several populations (Kroenke & Spitzer, 2002). Respondents rate how often they were bothered by eight problems on a likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores can range from 0-24; higher scores indicate higher levels of depression with score \>10 indicating clinically relevant depression.
Time frame: Baseline and Follow-up
Population: participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Personal Health Information Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | -1.30 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.14 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Personal Health Information Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | -.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.72 |
Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12)
The VR-12 is based on the Veterans RAND 36 (SF-36) and has been shown to be a good outcome measure of general physical and mental health with significant correlations with morbidity (Kazis, et al., 2006). It provides physical and mental health subscale scores. It consists of 12 questions (several with sub sections) which are rated on three point and five point likert-type scales. These ratings are then assigned values with some scored opposite so that higher values always indicate more positive health. The Physical Health component can range from 10-59 and the Mental Health component from 6-33.
Time frame: Baseline and Follow -up
Population: Participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measures
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) | Physical Health | 0.54 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.033 |
| Get Moving and Get Well | Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) | Mental Health | 7.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.75 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) | Mental Health | 3.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.86 |
| Health and Humor Class | Change in Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) | Physical Health | -2.5097 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.74 |
New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class
A chart review was completed in order to identify documentation of new health behaviors. Mental health notes were first reviewed and then key terms were searched in all notes during the time period. S We considered a new health behaviors as: Starting or increasing physical activity in a formal program; Starting or increasing physical activity on own; Starting nicotine replacement/report cutting down or quitting smoking/join a smoking cessation group; Treatment for alcohol or SA/Report cutting down on Alcohol use; Report changing diet/formal nutrition consult/etc. Chart abstractors were instructed to make free text notes explaining each event the counted. These were reviewed by the PI for accuracy.
Time frame: Start of class through 3 months post-class
Population: Veterans who completed both baseline and follow-up measures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | 17 Events |
| Health and Humor Class | New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | 7 Events |
Number of Participants Beginning New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class
A chart review was completed in order to identify documentation of new health behaviors. Mental health notes were first reviewed and then key terms were searched in all notes during the time period. S We considered a new health behaviors as: Starting or increasing physical activity in a formal program; Starting or increasing physical activity on own; Starting nicotine replacement/report cutting down or quitting smoking/join a smoking cessation group; Treatment for alcohol or SA/Report cutting down on Alcohol use; Report changing diet/formal nutrition consult/etc. Chart abstractors were instructed to make free text notes explaining each event the counted. These were reviewed by the PI for accuracy.
Time frame: Start of class through 3 months post-class
Population: Veterans who completed both baseline and follow-up measures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Get Moving and Get Well | Number of Participants Beginning New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | 8 participants |
| Health and Humor Class | Number of Participants Beginning New Health Behaviors From the Beginning of Classes Through Three Months Post End of Class | 5 participants |