Skip to content

Left Ventricular MultiSpot Pacing for CRT (iSPOT)

Left Ventricular MultiSpot Pacing for CRT (iSPOT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01883141
Acronym
iSPOT
Enrollment
31
Registered
2013-06-21
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2025-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

The purpose of the iSPOT Study is to evaluate the contractility using positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max across LV pacing site(s) in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Interventions

Subjects will receive pacing from one right ventricular lead and one left ventricular catheter/lead with multiple LV pacing spots

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is indicated for cardiac CRT or CRT-D device according to current applicable European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines * Subject has a left bundle branch block (LBBB) conduction pattern * Subject is in stable sinus rhythm at the time of implant (no atrial arrhythmias lasting \> 30 seconds during the last 2 weeks prior to inclusion and no documented atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes allowed during the last 2 weeks prior to inclusion) * Subject receives optimal heart failure oral medical therapy (ACE inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and Beta Blockers), and is on a stable medication scheme for at least 1 month prior to enrollment * Subject (or the legal guardian) is willing to sign informed consent form * Subject is 18 years or older or as specified minimal age per local law/regulation

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has permanent atrial fibrillation/ flutter or tachycardia * Subject experienced recent myocardial infarction (MI), within 40 days prior to enrollment * Subject underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery, within 90 days prior to enrollment * Subject is post heart transplantation, or is actively listed on the transplantation list * Subject is implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) * Subject is on chronic renal dialysis * Subject has severe renal disease (defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (equation provided by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study): (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2) * Subject is on continuous or uninterrupted infusion (inotropic) therapy for heart failure (≥ 2 stable infusions per week) * Subject has severe aortic stenosis (with a valve area of \<1.0 cm2 or significant valve disease expected to be operated within study period) * Subject has complex and uncorrected congenital heart disease * Subject has a mechanical heart valve * Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control * Subject is enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the results of this study * Subject is already implanted with a device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursMeasure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multispot LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursMeasure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.
Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Multispot LV Pacing ConfigurationParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursMeasure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to multispot LV pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.
Correlation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursCorrelate blood pressure, EGMs and electrocardiographic mapping measurements with the percentage change LV dP/dt max values obtained during each of the three pacing configurations BiV (BiV distal, BiV mid, BiV proximal, BiV anterior, BiV posterior), MultiVein and MultiSpot. Correlation will be summarized over all pacing configurations and time points since the interest is in the overall correlation between LV dP/dt max and other measurements, not in the correlation per pacing configuration or per time point. A linear mixed effects models as described in Roy, Biometrical Journal 48 (2006) 2, 286- 301 was used for the diastolic and systolic blood pressures. Due to the convergence problems for the linear mixed for Q-LV and QRS, the general linear model as described in Blank & Altman, Biometrical Journal 310 (1995), p 446, was used for Q-LV and QRS.
Use of Non-invasive Measurements to Identify Pacing Configuration With Highest Positive LV dP/dt MaxParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursEvaluate whether the non-invasive measurements (Nexfin blood pressures) that are also collected during the study can identify the pacing configuration with the highest percentage change LV dP/dt max. For each patient and all time points of data collection, a regression analysis was applied to determine the highest predicted percentage change LV dP/dtmax or percentage change Nexfin pressure per configuration. The Kappa statistic was then determined based on a 7x7 contingency table where the rows and columns corresponded to the pacing configurations. There is no interest in determining the agreement statistics Kappa per time point or per configuration since the interest of this analysis is in the overall agreement between LV dP/dt max and non-invasive measurements.
Within Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxParticipants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hoursEvaluate the within patient variability in positive LV dP/dt max measurements. The standard deviation of the percentage change LV dP/dt max between pacing configurations will be evaluated to obtain information for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.The standard deviation is summarized over all available subjects and could be used as an estimate of within patient variability for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.

Countries

Belgium, Israel, Poland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eligible Patients
The study enrolled 31 patients of which 30 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEligible Patients
Age, Continuous61 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular Pacing

Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multispot LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: Patients underwent an electrophysiological (EP) visit during which multispot, multivein and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed for each patient. From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis (EP data collection issues: n = 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV distal28.38 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.15
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV mid28.58 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.62
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV proximal30.05 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.75
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingMultispot31.04 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.25
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV anterior22.17 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.31
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multispot LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV posterior30.05 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.7
Secondary

Correlation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max Values

Correlate blood pressure, EGMs and electrocardiographic mapping measurements with the percentage change LV dP/dt max values obtained during each of the three pacing configurations BiV (BiV distal, BiV mid, BiV proximal, BiV anterior, BiV posterior), MultiVein and MultiSpot. Correlation will be summarized over all pacing configurations and time points since the interest is in the overall correlation between LV dP/dt max and other measurements, not in the correlation per pacing configuration or per time point. A linear mixed effects models as described in Roy, Biometrical Journal 48 (2006) 2, 286- 301 was used for the diastolic and systolic blood pressures. Due to the convergence problems for the linear mixed for Q-LV and QRS, the general linear model as described in Blank & Altman, Biometrical Journal 310 (1995), p 446, was used for Q-LV and QRS.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: Patients underwent an electrophysiological (EP) visit during which multispot, multivein and biventricular (BIV) pacing was performed for each patient. From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis due to EP data collection issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesSystolic blood pressure (Codan System)0.63 Correlation coefficient
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesDiastolic blood pressure (Codan system)0.45 Correlation coefficient
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesSystolic blood pressure (Nexfin system)0.37 Correlation coefficient
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesDiastolic blood pressure (Nexfin system)0.23 Correlation coefficient
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesQRS duration ratio-0.20 Correlation coefficient
Eligible PatientsCorrelation of Blood Pressure, Electrograms (EGMs) and Electrocardiographic Mapping Measurements With the Positive LV dP/dt Max ValuesQ-LV0.52 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Multispot LV Pacing Configuration

Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to multispot LV pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: Patients underwent an electrophysiological (EP) visit during which multispot, multivein and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed for each patient. From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis (EP data collection issues: n = 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Multispot LV Pacing ConfigurationMultispot31.04 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.25
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Multispot LV Pacing ConfigurationMultivein30.83 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.44
Secondary

Percentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular Pacing

Measure the percentage change in positive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max (mm HG/sec) of multi-vein LV pacing configuration compared to normal biventricular pacing in patients undergoing a research study, an electrophysiological exploratory procedure or CRT-implant. The percentage changes correspond to a percentage change between a pacing configuration (pacing on, e.g., Multispot pacing) and baseline (LV pacing off). There are several repetitions of pacing off and on for each pacing configuration. For one repetition, the percentage change is determined as (\[median dP/dt max during pacing On\] - (median baseline dP/dt max during pacing Off\])/\[median dP/dt max during pacing Off\]. From all percentage changes for a given pacing configuration and subject, a regression analysis is performed to determine the regression predicted highest percentage change. The presented percentage change is the average over all subjects.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: Patients underwent an electrophysiological (EP) visit during which multispot, multivein and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed for each patient. From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis (EP data collection issues: n = 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV distal28.38 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.15
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV mid28.58 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.62
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV proximal30.05 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.75
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV anterior22.17 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 2.31
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingBiV posterior30.05 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.7
Eligible PatientsPercentage Change in Positive Left Ventricular (LV) dP/dt Max (mm HG/Sec) of Multi-vein LV Pacing Configuration Compared to Normal Biventricular PacingMultivein30.83 percentage change LV dP/dt maxStandard Error 3.44
Secondary

Use of Non-invasive Measurements to Identify Pacing Configuration With Highest Positive LV dP/dt Max

Evaluate whether the non-invasive measurements (Nexfin blood pressures) that are also collected during the study can identify the pacing configuration with the highest percentage change LV dP/dt max. For each patient and all time points of data collection, a regression analysis was applied to determine the highest predicted percentage change LV dP/dtmax or percentage change Nexfin pressure per configuration. The Kappa statistic was then determined based on a 7x7 contingency table where the rows and columns corresponded to the pacing configurations. There is no interest in determining the agreement statistics Kappa per time point or per configuration since the interest of this analysis is in the overall agreement between LV dP/dt max and non-invasive measurements.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis due to EP data collection issues and 2 patients were excluded since no blood pressure was collected non-invasively using a Nexfin system.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Eligible PatientsUse of Non-invasive Measurements to Identify Pacing Configuration With Highest Positive LV dP/dt MaxSystolic blood pressure (Nexfin system)0.33 Kappa statistic
Eligible PatientsUse of Non-invasive Measurements to Identify Pacing Configuration With Highest Positive LV dP/dt MaxDiastolic blood pressure (Nexfin system)0.33 Kappa statistic
Secondary

Within Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt Max

Evaluate the within patient variability in positive LV dP/dt max measurements. The standard deviation of the percentage change LV dP/dt max between pacing configurations will be evaluated to obtain information for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.The standard deviation is summarized over all available subjects and could be used as an estimate of within patient variability for future sample size calculations for the primary outcome.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the time of the EP procedure, which has an average duration of 2 to 3 hours

Population: Patients underwent an electrophysiological (EP) visit during which multispot, multivein and biventricular (BIV) pacing was performed for each patient. From the 30 eligible patients, 4 patients were excluded from analysis due to EP data collection issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Eligible PatientsWithin Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxMultispot to BiV distal7.9 percentage change
Eligible PatientsWithin Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxMultiSpot to BiV proximal5.6 percentage change
Eligible PatientsWithin Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxMultiSpot to BiV mid7.1 percentage change
Eligible PatientsWithin Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxMultiSpot to BiV anterior11.0 percentage change
Eligible PatientsWithin Patient Variability in Positive LV dP/dt MaxMultiSpot to BiV posterior13.5 percentage change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026