Skip to content

Corneal Staining Associated With Daily Disposable Beauty Contact Lenses

Corneal Staining Associated With Daily Disposable Beauty Contact Lenses

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01882465
Enrollment
35
Registered
2013-06-20
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive Error

Brief summary

Limbal ring contact lenses enhance the look of the eye by adding pigmentation in a ring pattern to the contact lens. The purpose of this investigation is to determine if corneal staining increase is dependent upon the lens pigment location.

Interventions

DEVICEetafilcon A

Lenses to be worn in a daily wear modality, and disposed of at the end of each follow-up visit.

DEVICE2-HEMA, EGDMA Non-ionic

Lenses to be worn in a daily wear modality, and disposed of at the end of each follow-up visit.

DEVICEhefilcon A

Lenses to be worn in a daily wear modality, and disposed of at the end of each follow-up visit.

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Fluency in English and ability to read and understand written English. 3. The subject must be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 4. The subject must be between 18 and 35 years of age. 5. The subject must be an adapted (minimum of 4 week history of daily wear prior to the baseline study visit) soft contact lens wearer in both eyes. 6. The subject must be East or Southeast Asia descent, e.g. ethnic Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Filipino, etc. by self-report. 7. The subject must come in with a current (no more than 12 month old) spectacle or contact lens prescription as indicated. (NB: Emmetropic subjects who wear contact lenses for enhancement purposes only will also require a current contact lens prescription). 8. The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of PLANO to -6.00 Diopter (D) in each eye. 9. The subject must have best corrected visual acuity on +0.24 logMAR (equivalent to 20/30 (-2)) or better in each eye. 10. The subject must own a wearable pair of spectacles (as indicated by current prescription) and wear them to all visits including the screening visit as required for vision correction. They must be willing to wear their spectacles during the 24 hour washout period leading up to each treatment visit (NB: Emmetropic subjects who do not own spectacles must agree to no lens wear on all visit days including the screening visit). 11. The subject must have normal eye (i.e., no ocular medications or infections of any type).

Exclusion criteria

1. Are currently pregnant or lactating, determined by self-report (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued). 2. Have any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear. 3. Have any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. This may include, but may not be limited to diabetes, hyperthyroidism, recurrent herpes simplex/zoster, Sjogren's syndromes, xerophthalmia, acne rosacea, Stevens-Johnson syndromes. 4. Use any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. 5. Have entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia. 6. Had any previous, or have planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., cataract surgery, radial keratotomy, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). 7. Have any grade 3.0 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the Efron classification scale or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear. 8. Have any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to contact lenses (as assessed by ocular history). 9. Have any ocular infection. 10. Have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. 11. Have participated in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment. 12. Have any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), by self-report. 13. Currently wear their contact lenes on an extended wear basis. 14. Is an employee of the investigational clinic (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician). 15. Currently wears toric or multifocal contact lenses. If the subject wears soft contact lenses for monovision, they must be willing to wear distance only correction in both eyes for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal Staining20 minutes and 7 hours post lens fittingCorneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The total was calculated by using the sum across all regions by time point. The range for the total grade for each time point would be 0-20. The total average grade for each lens and time point was evaluated as an average change from baseline level of corneal staining.

Countries

Hong Kong

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 35 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of the enrolled 1 subject did not meet the eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

Of the remaining 34 subjects, 1 subjects withdrew consent before randomization and was discontinued from the study. A total of 33 subjects were dispensed a study lens. Of the dispensed subjects 2 were discontinued and 31 completed the study. A total of 3 subjects were discontinued from this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
All subjects that were enrolled into the study.
35
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Period 1Lens Discomfort0001000
Period 1Withdrawal by Subject0000001
Period 2Protocol Violation0000100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age, Continuous22.03 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.885
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 340 / 340 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 340 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Corneal Staining

Corneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The total was calculated by using the sum across all regions by time point. The range for the total grade for each time point would be 0-20. The total average grade for each lens and time point was evaluated as an average change from baseline level of corneal staining.

Time frame: 20 minutes and 7 hours post lens fitting

Population: All subjects that completed every study visit without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etafilcon ACorneal Staining7 Hours Post Lens Fitting-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.154
Etafilcon ACorneal StainingBaseline: 20 Minutes0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.569
2-HEMA, EGDMA Non-ionicCorneal StainingBaseline: 20 Minutes0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
2-HEMA, EGDMA Non-ionicCorneal Staining7 Hours Post Lens Fitting0.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Hefilcon ACorneal Staining7 Hours Post Lens Fitting-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.233
Hefilcon ACorneal StainingBaseline: 20 Minutes0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.624

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026