Skip to content

Oprozomib and Dexamethasone,in Combination With Lenalidomide or Oral Cyclophosphamide to Treat Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Phase 1b/2, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Oprozomib and Dexamethasone, in Combination With Lenalidomide or Oral Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01881789
Enrollment
22
Registered
2013-06-20
Start date
2013-10-28
Completion date
2019-09-23
Last updated
2022-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

multiple myeloma, proteasome inhibitor, oprozomib, orpozomib tablets

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study included the following: Phase 1b: * To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oprozomib given in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ORd) or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (OCyd) * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of oprozomib and dexamethasone administered in combination with lenalidomide or oral cyclophosphamide Phase 2: * To estimate the antitumor activity of each combination regimen, as measured by overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of each combination regimens, as assessed by the type, incidence, severity and seriousness of adverse events, and abnormalities in selected laboratory analytes

Detailed description

Phase 1b used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme to determine the MTD. For each combination regimen, oprozomib doses were to be escalated in sequential cohorts of 3 participants with expansion to up to 6 participants if a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in 1 of the first 3 participants. The doses of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone were to remain fixed in all dose cohorts. The phase 2 portion of the study was to include up to 35 additional participants in each of the 2 combination regimens, treated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of oprozomib that was identified during the phase 1b portion of the study in order to better characterize safety and tolerability, and antimyeloma activity. This study was stopped by sponsor decision during the dose escalation in phase 1b prior to initiation of phase 2.

Interventions

Extended release (ER) tablets administered orally

DRUGLenalidomide

Administered orally at a dose of 25 mg on days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 24 cycles.

DRUGDexamethasone

Administered at 20 mg, orally, on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of each 28-day cycle. After the first cycle the dose may be decreased to 10 mg/day in participants \> 75 years of age, at the discretion of the investigator.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Administered orally at 300 mg/m² (up to a maximum of 600 mg) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles of therapy (approximately 8 months).

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma patients for whom treatment is indicated per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and for whom a hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not planned or scheduled during the study or are considered ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant, with measurable disease * Creatinine clearance of ≥ 50 mL/min (measured or calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault formula) Key

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior systemic antimyeloma therapy except oral steroids (dexamethasone up to a total dose of 160 mg or equivalent within 14 days prior to the first dose of study treatment). Use of topical or inhaled steroids is acceptable * Radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to first dose * Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to first dose * Active infection requiring systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks prior to first dose * Clinical significant gastrointestinal bleeding in the 6 months prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) first dose * Significant neuropathy (Grade 3, Grade 4, or Grade 2 with pain) at the time of first dose * Other malignancy within the past 3 years except those considered cured by surgical resection including some cases of: with the exception of adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell skin cancer, thyroid cancer, carcinoma in situ of the breast or cervix, carcinoma in situ of the breast, prostate cancer with Gleason Score 6 or less with stable prostate specific antigen levels, or cancer considered cured by surgical resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Cycle 1, 28 daysDLTs were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. A DLT is defined as any of the following treatment-related events: * Any ≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following conditions: * ≥ Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or constipation only if for \> 7 days despite optimal supportive care * Asymptomatic Grade 3 hypophosphatemia, Grade 3 hyperglycemia or toxicity solely due to dexamethasone, ≥ Grade 3 rash attributed to lenalidomide, and Grade 3 fatigue for \< 14 days were not considered DLTs * Grade 4 neutropenia: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 0.5 × 10\^9/L lasting ≥ 7 days, despite myeloid growth factor support * Febrile neutropenia * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for ≥ 7 days or \< 7 days with ≥ Grade 2 clinically significant bleeding or \< 10,000 platelets requiring platelet transfusion, or Grade ≥ 3 with clinically significant bleeding or requiring platelet transfusion.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)From first dose of any study treatment to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment was 29.1, 12.4, 11.3, 66.6, 7.8, and 46.4 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE (version 4.03) and according to the following: Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = a severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening AE, and Grade 5 = death due to AE. A serious AE is an event that met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Death * Life-threatening experience * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * A congenital anomaly birth defect in the offspring of an exposed female subject or offspring of a female partner of a male subject * Important medical events that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed above. Treatment-related AEs are those considered related to at least 1 study drug by the investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1 at 1 to 2.5 hours and 2.75 to 5 hours after end of infusion (EOI) and cycle 3 day 1 at predose and 1 to 2.5 hours and 2.75 to 5 hours after EOI.Plasma samples for oprozomib concentration assays were only collected for participants in the 5/14 dosing schedule groups. Oprozomib plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Disease response was assessed every 4 weeks for 24 cycles then every 8 weeks until end of treatment; median duration of treatment at the analysis cutoff date of 18 July 2016 was 29.1, 12.4, 11.3, 66.6, 7.8 and 46.4 weeks in each group, respectivelyORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent CR (sCR) based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and ≥ 90% reduction in urine M-protein or to \< 200 mg/24 hrs, or a ≥ 50% decrease in dFLC. A ≥ 50% decrease in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas present at baseline. VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% decrease in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hrs. If disease measurable only by SFLC, ≥ 90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (dFLC). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in BM. Normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio if disease measurable only by SFLC. sCR: As for CR, and absence of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow (BM).
Duration of Response (DOR)Disease response was assessed every 4 weeks for 24 cycles then every 8 weeks until end of treatment; median time on follow-up at the analysis cut-off date of 18 July 2016 was 14.1, 3.5, 2.6, 16.0, 3.6, and 11.2 months in each group, respectively.Duration of response was defined as the time from first evidence of partial response (PR) or better to confirmation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Median DOR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants who started a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date or who died or had disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit were censored at the date of last disease assessment.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)From first dose of study drug through the data cut-off date of 18 July 2016; median time on follow-up was 14.1, 3.5, 2.6, 16.0, 3.6, and 11.2 months in each group, respectivelyProgression-free survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants who started a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date or who died or had disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit were censored at the date of last disease assessment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 17 study centers in the United States. Twenty-two participants were enrolled, however one participant discontinued before being assigned to a treatment cohort. Enrollment was halted during dose-escalation and Phase 2 was not conducted.

Pre-assignment details

In the Phase 1b portion of the study participants were enrolled sequentially using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schema. The final planned analysis for efficacy was performed using a data cut-off date of 18 July 2016, at which time 3 participants remained on treatment. The final analysis of safety was conducted after all participants had discontinued treatment (23 September 2019).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 150 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 (5/14 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 24 cycles, whichever occurred first. After completing 24 cycles of treatment, participants with stable disease or better could have continued on oprozomib with or without dexamethasone pretreatment.
3
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 180 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 (5/14 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 24 cycles, whichever occurred first. After completing 24 cycles of treatment, participants with stable disease or better could have continued on oprozomib with or without dexamethasone pretreatment.
7
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 210 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 (5/14 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 24 cycles, whichever occurred first.
3
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 210 mg once daily on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 (2/7 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 24 cycles, whichever occurred first. After completing 24 cycles of treatment, participants with stable disease or better could have continued on oprozomib with or without dexamethasone pretreatment.
3
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 240 mg once daily on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 (2/7 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 24 cycles, whichever occurred first. After completing 24 cycles of treatment, participants with stable disease or better could have continued on oprozomib with or without dexamethasone pretreatment.
2
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + Dexamethasone
Participants received oprozomib 210 mg once daily on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 (2/7 schedule) of each 28-day treatment cycle, in combination with oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 and dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23, until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or for 8 cycles, whichever occurred first. After completing 8 cycles of treatment, participants with stable disease or better were to continue on oprozomib with dexamethasone premedication for a total of 24 cycles or until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. After completing 24 cycles of treatment, participants without evidence of disease progression could have continued on oprozomib with or without dexamethasone pretreatment.
3
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyOther352311
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor000001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject021011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneOprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone
Age, Continuous67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
72.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 0 (Fully active)
13 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 1 (Restricted but ambulatory)
8 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 2 (Ambulatory but unable to work)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
18 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 70 / 30 / 30 / 20 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 37 / 73 / 33 / 32 / 23 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 34 / 73 / 32 / 31 / 21 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLTs were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. A DLT is defined as any of the following treatment-related events: * Any ≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following conditions: * ≥ Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or constipation only if for \> 7 days despite optimal supportive care * Asymptomatic Grade 3 hypophosphatemia, Grade 3 hyperglycemia or toxicity solely due to dexamethasone, ≥ Grade 3 rash attributed to lenalidomide, and Grade 3 fatigue for \< 14 days were not considered DLTs * Grade 4 neutropenia: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 0.5 × 10\^9/L lasting ≥ 7 days, despite myeloid growth factor support * Febrile neutropenia * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for ≥ 7 days or \< 7 days with ≥ Grade 2 clinically significant bleeding or \< 10,000 platelets requiring platelet transfusion, or Grade ≥ 3 with clinically significant bleeding or requiring platelet transfusion.

Time frame: Cycle 1, 28 days

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)2 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE (version 4.03) and according to the following: Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = a severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening AE, and Grade 5 = death due to AE. A serious AE is an event that met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Death * Life-threatening experience * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * A congenital anomaly birth defect in the offspring of an exposed female subject or offspring of a female partner of a male subject * Important medical events that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed above. Treatment-related AEs are those considered related to at least 1 study drug by the investigator.

Time frame: From first dose of any study treatment to 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment was 29.1, 12.4, 11.3, 66.6, 7.8, and 46.4 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events2 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 33 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 33 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events2 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)7 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)7 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events4 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events4 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 36 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 36 Participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 33 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 33 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events2 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events1 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events1 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug1 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)2 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)2 Participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse events1 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE ≥ grade 32 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)3 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal adverse events0 Participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)3 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response was defined as the time from first evidence of partial response (PR) or better to confirmation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Median DOR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants who started a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date or who died or had disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit were censored at the date of last disease assessment.

Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 4 weeks for 24 cycles then every 8 weeks until end of treatment; median time on follow-up at the analysis cut-off date of 18 July 2016 was 14.1, 3.5, 2.6, 16.0, 3.6, and 11.2 months in each group, respectively.

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment and who achieved a best overall response of sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneDuration of Response (DOR)NA months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent CR (sCR) based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and ≥ 90% reduction in urine M-protein or to \< 200 mg/24 hrs, or a ≥ 50% decrease in dFLC. A ≥ 50% decrease in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas present at baseline. VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% decrease in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hrs. If disease measurable only by SFLC, ≥ 90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (dFLC). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in BM. Normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio if disease measurable only by SFLC. sCR: As for CR, and absence of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow (BM).

Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 4 weeks for 24 cycles then every 8 weeks until end of treatment; median duration of treatment at the analysis cutoff date of 18 July 2016 was 29.1, 12.4, 11.3, 66.6, 7.8 and 46.4 weeks in each group, respectively

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)66.7 percentage of participants
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)57.1 percentage of participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)66.7 percentage of participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)50.0 percentage of participants
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneOverall Response Rate (ORR)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Oprozomib Concentration

Plasma samples for oprozomib concentration assays were only collected for participants in the 5/14 dosing schedule groups. Oprozomib plasma concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at 1 to 2.5 hours and 2.75 to 5 hours after end of infusion (EOI) and cycle 3 day 1 at predose and 1 to 2.5 hours and 2.75 to 5 hours after EOI.

Population: Participants in the 5/14 dosing schedule groups with available concentration data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI111 ng/mL
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, predose0.0 ng/mL
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI497 ng/mL
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI299 ng/mL
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI2.00 ng/mL
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, predose142 ng/mLStandard Deviation 285
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI632 ng/mLStandard Deviation 657
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI15.8 ng/mL
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI175 ng/mLStandard Deviation 303
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI255 ng/mLStandard Deviation 323
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI69.1 ng/mL
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI178 ng/mL
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 1 - 2.5 hours post EOI697 ng/mLStandard Deviation 435
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 3 day 1, predose0.0 ng/mL
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasonePlasma Oprozomib ConcentrationCycle 1 day 1, 2.75 - 5 hours post EOI78.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 48.9
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants who started a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date or who died or had disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit were censored at the date of last disease assessment.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through the data cut-off date of 18 July 2016; median time on follow-up was 14.1, 3.5, 2.6, 16.0, 3.6, and 11.2 months in each group, respectively

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Oprozomib 150 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Oprozomib 180 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 5/14 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Oprozomib 240 mg 2/7 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Oprozomib 210 mg 2/7 + Cyclophosphamide + DexamethasoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)NA months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026