Skip to content

Evaluate Risk/Benefit of Nab Paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Compared to Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (or Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer)

A Phase 2/3, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Weekly Nab®-Paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine or Carboplatin, Compared to Gemcitabine/Carboplatin, as First Line Treatment in Subjects With ER, PgR, and HER2 Negative (Triple Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01881230
Acronym
tnAcity
Enrollment
191
Registered
2013-06-19
Start date
2013-09-26
Completion date
2016-10-28
Last updated
2019-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Breast Tumor, Cancer of the Breast, Estrogen Receptor- Negative Breast Cancer, HER2- Negative Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Progesterone Receptor- Negative Breast Cancer, Recurrent Breast Cancer, Stage IV Breast Cancer, Triple-negative Breast Cancer, Triple-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Cancer of the Breast, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer, Basal-like breast cancer, Hormone receptor negative breast cancer, Estrogen receptor negative breast cancer, Progesterone negative receptor breast cancer, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer, Abraxane, nab-Paclitaxel, ABI-007, gemcitabine, Gemzar, carboplatin, Paraplatin, Paraplatin AQ, Phase 2, Phase 3

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in combination with either gemcitabine or carboplatin to the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first line treatment in female subjects with triple negative metastatic breast cancer (TNMBC) or metastatic triple negative breast cancer.

Detailed description

ABI-007-MBC- 001 is a Phase 2/3, multicenter, open-label, randomized, study that will compare the safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine or carboplatin to the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first line therapy in female subjects with Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (triple negative) metastatic breast cancer (TNMBC) or metastatic triple negative breast cancer. In the phase 2 portion of the study, the combinations of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin will be evaluated, and a comparator arm of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin will be used. In the phase 3 portion of the study, the selected nab-paclitaxel combination treatment will be compared to gemcitabine combined with carboplatin to evaluate progression free survival, safety and tolerability, overall survival, disease control rate and duration of response in women with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. Due to changes in the treatment landscape since the initiation of this trial, the decision was made not to proceed to the Phase 3 portion of the study.

Interventions

DRUGnab-Paclitaxel

nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m\^2 by IV administration over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day treatment cycle.

DRUGCarboplatin

Carboplatin at an AUC of 2 on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle by IV administration

DRUGGemcitabine

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day treatment cycle.

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria are met: 1. Female subjects, age ≥ 18 years at the time informed consent is signed 2. Pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast 3. Pathologically confirmed as triple negative, source documented, defined as both of the following 1. Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PgR) negative: \< 1% of tumor cell nuclei are immunoreactive in the presence of evidence that the sample can express ER or PgR (positive intrinsic controls) 2. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) negative as per American Society of Clinical Oncology - College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines i. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 or 1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) negative (or equivalent negative test). Subjects with IHC 2 must have a negative by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH),, (or equivalent negative test). 4. Subjects with prior breast cancer history of different phenotypes (ie, ER/PgR/HER2 positive) must have pathologic confirmation of triple negative disease in at least one of the current sites of metastasis 5. Subjects must have received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant anthracycline therapy; unless (a) anthracycline treatment was not indicated or was not the best treatment option for the subject in the opinion of the treating physician; and (b) anthracycline treatment remains not indicated or, in the opinion of the treating physician, is not the best treatment option for the subject's metastatic disease. a. Newly diagnosed subjects presenting with TNMBC are eligible for the study if anthracycline treatment is not indicated or is not the best treatment option for the subject in the opinion of the treating physician. 6. Subjects with measurable metastatic disease, defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) guidelines 7. Life expectancy ≥ 16 weeks from randomization 8. No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Prior immunotherapy and/or monoclonal antibody therapy are acceptable. Prior treatments must have been discontinued at least 30 days prior to start of study treatment and all related toxicities must have resolved to Grade 1 or less. 9. Prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, if given, must have been completed at least 6 months before randomization with all related toxicities resolved, and documented evidence of disease progression per RECIST 1.1 guidelines is required. a. If prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy contained taxane, gemcitabine, or platinum agents, the treatment must have completed at least 12 months before randomization 10. Prior radiotherapy must have completed before randomization, with full recovery from acute radiation side effects. At least one measurable lesion must be completely outside the radiation portal or there must be unequivocal radiologic or clinical exam proof of progressive disease within the radiation portal, in accordance with RECIST 1.1 guidelines 11. At least 30 days from major surgery before randomization, with full recovery 12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 13. Subject has the following blood counts at screening: * Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1500/mm\^2 ; * Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm\^2 ; * Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 9 g/dL 14. Subject has the following blood chemistry levels at screening: * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT ) Serum Glutamic Pyruvate Transaminase (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN); if hepatic metastases present ≤ 5.0 x ULN * Total serum bilirubin ≤ ULN; or total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 × ULN with direct bilirubin within normal range in subjects with documented Gilbert's Syndrome * Creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min (by Cockcroft-Gault) 15. Females of child-bearing potential \[defined as a sexually mature women who (1) have not undergone hysterectomy (the surgical removal of the uterus) or bilateral oophorectomy (the surgical removal of both ovaries) or (2) have not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time during the preceding 24 consecutive months)\] must: * Demonstrate a negative serum pregnancy test result at screening (performed by central lab) confirmed by local negative urine pregnancy dipstick within 72 hours prior to the first dose of IP); pregnancy test with sensitivity of at least 25 mIU/mL; and * Either commit to true abstinence\* from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, two physician approved effective contraception methods (oral, injectable, or implantable hormonal contraceptive; tubal ligation; intra-uterine device; barrier contraceptive with spermicide; or vasectomized partner) without interruption for 28 days or longer as required by local guidelines, prior to starting study drug, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of the study or longer as required by local guidelines 16. Females must abstain from breastfeeding starting at randomization, during study participation and for 28 days or longer as required by local guidelines, after IP discontinuation 17. Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures are conducted 18. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: 1. Male subjects 2. Concurrent chemotherapy or any other anti tumor therapy for breast cancer. Prior immunotherapy & monoclonal antibody therapy are acceptable. 3. Subjects who received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy after incomplete resection of locoregional recurrent disease 4. History of, or known current evidence of brain metastasis, including leptomeningeal involvement. 5. Subjects with bone as the only site of metastatic disease 6. Subjects with regional lymph node as the only site of metastatic disease 7. Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including serious active infection 8. History of class II-IV congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization 9. History of other primary malignancy in the last 5 years prior to randomization. Subjects with prior breast cancer history are eligible, however, the most recently obtained biopsy must demonstrate triple negative disease (source documented). Subjects with prior history of in situ cancer or basal or localized squamous cell skin cancer are eligible. 10. Subjects with a history of interstitial lung disease, history of slowly progressive dyspnea and unproductive cough, sarcoidosis, silicosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypersensitivity pneumonitis or multiple uncontrolled or unstable allergies which, in the opinion of the investigator, may lead to serious complications 11. Peripheral neuropathy Grade ≥ 2 by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0 12. Subjects who have received an investigational product within the previous 4 weeks prior to randomization 13. Subject is currently enrolled, or will enroll in a different clinical study in which investigational therapeutic procedures are performed or investigational therapies are administered while participating in this study 14. Pregnant or nursing women 15. Subjects with prior hypersensitivity to nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, carboplatin or any other platin, or nucleoside analogue agents 16. Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study 17. Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if she were to participate in the study 18. Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study 19. History of seropositive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 20. Subjects who are receiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive medications that would, in the opinion of the investigator, increase the risk of serious neutropenic complications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment.From date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm CPFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause on or prior to the data cutoff date for the statistical analysis, whichever occurred earlier. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks using, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and defined as: Complete response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response (PR) occurs when at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; Stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for Progressive disease (PD); Progressive Disease- is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Initiated Cycle 6 Receiving Doublet Combination TherapyCycle 6The percentage of participants who initiated Cycle 6 receiving doublet combination therapy regardless of the need for dose modifications.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall SurvivalFrom date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm COverall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death (from any cause).
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response by Investigator Assessment.Disease response was assessed every 6 weeks; from date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm CPercentage of participants with an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response according to RECIST 1.1 and defined as: Complete response-disappearance of all target lesions; partial response at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; stable disease-neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for Progressive disease (PD)• Progressive Disease- At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)From randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data-cut off of date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm CThe number of participants with dose modifications occurring during the treatment period. Dose reductions and interruptions are typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and /or treatment emergent adverse events/toxicities.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From All Study Treatment Due to TEAEsFrom randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data-cut off of date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm CTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AEs that begin or worsen with an onset date on or after the date of the first dose of IP through 28 days after the last dose.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data cut off date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm CTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AEs that began or worsened with the onset date on or after the date of the first dose of IP through 28 days after the last dose. A serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was graded based on the participant's symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity as follows: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This multicenter study was conducted by investigators in 11 countries in North America, Europe, Australia and South America, and enrolled participants at a total of 86 sites. Due to changes in the treatment landscape since the initiation of this trial, the decision was made not to proceed to the Phase 3 portion of the study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by disease free interval (≤ 1 year; \> 1 year).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel Plus (+) Gemcitabine
Participants received nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 by intravenous (IV) administration followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 by IV administration in each 21-day treatment cycle. Participants continued treatment until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, required palliative radiotherapy or surgical intervention of lesion(s), withdrawal from study treatment, withdrawal of study consent, participant refusal or the investigator felt it was no longer in the best interest of the participant to continue on treatment.
61
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Participants received nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 by IV administration followed by carboplatin area under the curve 2 (AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 in each 21-day treatment cycle. Participants continued treatment until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, required palliative radiotherapy or surgical intervention of lesion(s), withdrawal from study treatment, withdrawal of study consent, participant refusal or the investigator felt it was no longer in the best interest of the participant to continue on treatment.
64
Arm C: Gemcitabine + Carboplatin
Participants received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 by IV administration, followed by carboplatin AUC 2 on Days 1 and 8 by IV administration in each 21-day treatment cycle. Participants continued treatment until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, required palliative radiotherapy or surgical intervention of lesion(s), withdrawal from study treatment, withdrawal of study consent, participant refusal or the investigator felt it was no longer in the best interest of the participant to continue on treatment.
66
Total191

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event91312
Overall StudyDeath201
Overall StudyGiven Commercially Available Drug002
Overall StudyMiscellaneous330
Overall StudyNon-Compliance with Study Drug120
Overall StudyPhysician Decision436
Overall StudyProgressive Disease313536
Overall StudyProtocol Violation110
Overall StudySymptomatic Deterioration331
Overall StudyUntreated: Death001
Overall StudyUntreated: Other001
Overall StudyUntreated: Withdrawal Before Study Start100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject646

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalArm A: Nab-Paclitaxel Plus (+) GemcitabineArm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinArm C: Gemcitabine + Carboplatin
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.67
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.16
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.96
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87
Current Sites of Metastasis
Abdomen/Peritoneal
6 participants1 participants2 participants3 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Bone
69 participants23 participants21 participants25 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Liver
56 participants17 participants16 participants23 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Lung/Thoracic
125 participants42 participants42 participants41 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Lymph Nodes(s)
139 participants38 participants50 participants51 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Other
31 participants13 participants10 participants8 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Right/Left Breast
51 participants15 participants19 participants17 participants
Current Sites of Metastasis
Skin/Soft Tissue
34 participants13 participants13 participants8 participants
Disease Free Interval by Clinical Interpretation
≤ 1 year
53 Years17 Years16 Years20 Years
Disease Free Interval by Clinical Interpretation
> 1 year
136 Years43 Years48 Years45 Years
Disease Free Interval by Clinical Interpretation
Missing
2 Years1 Years0 Years1 Years
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 = Fully Active
114 Participants34 Participants38 Participants42 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 = Restrictive but ambulatory
73 Participants25 Participants26 Participants22 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 = Ambulatory but unable to work
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race
Black or African American
23 Participants9 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants2 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race
White
159 Participants50 Participants55 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
191 Participants61 Participants64 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage 0
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IA
24 Participants7 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IB
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IIA
38 Participants14 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IIB
24 Participants8 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IIIA
22 Participants9 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IIIB
11 Participants3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IIIC
8 Participants3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Stage of Primary Diagnosis
Stage IV
38 Participants11 Participants17 Participants10 Participants
Time from Diagnosis to First Documented Disease/Relapse40.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.46
38.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.46
29.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.18
50.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 62.6
Time from First Documented Metastatic Disease/Relapse to Study Randomization2.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.07
2.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.08
4.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.39
1.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Time from Primary Diagnosis to Randomization44.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.53
43.7 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.6
35.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.51
52.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 62.37
Triple-Negative at Latest Diagnosis187 Participants60 Participants62 Participants65 Participants
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) at Primary Diagnosis152 Participants51 Participants53 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
59 / 6063 / 6462 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 6020 / 6425 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause on or prior to the data cutoff date for the statistical analysis, whichever occurred earlier. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks using, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and defined as: Complete response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response (PR) occurs when at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; Stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for Progressive disease (PD); Progressive Disease- is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir.

Time frame: From date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm C

Population: ITT includes all randomized participants regardless of whether they received any IP or had any efficacy assessments collected. Those who did not have disease progression or had not died as of the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last radiologic assessment prior to the data cutoff date.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineKaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment.5.5 months
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinKaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment.8.3 months
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinKaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment.6.0 months
Comparison: For stratified analysis, the stratified log-rank test and stratified Cox proportional hazards model were used, where the stratification factor is the disease free interval (\<= 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.018395% CI: [1.089, 2.629]Log Rank
Comparison: For stratified analysis, the stratified log-rank test and stratified Cox proportional hazards model were used, where the stratification factor is the disease free interval (\<= 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.015295% CI: [0.373, 0.904]Log Rank
Comparison: For stratified analysis, the stratified log-rank test and stratified Cox proportional hazards model were used, where the stratification factor is the disease free interval (\<= 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.859995% CI: [0.676, 1.597]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death (from any cause).

Time frame: From date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm C

Population: The ITT population includes all randomized participants regardless of whether the participant received any Investigational Product (IP) or had any efficacy assessments collected.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineKaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival12.1 months
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinKaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival16.8 months
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinKaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival12.6 months
Comparison: Hazard ratios and associated two-sided 95% confidence intervals were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard model. The stratification factor is the disease free interval (≤ 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.157995% CI: [0.882, 2.143]Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratios and associated two-sided 95% confidence intervals were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard model. The stratification factor is the disease free interval (≤ 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.294595% CI: [0.52, 1.221]Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratios and associated two-sided 95% confidence intervals were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard model. The stratification factor is the disease free interval (≤ 1 year; \> 1 year).p-value: 0.669195% CI: [0.71, 1.708]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AEs that began or worsened with the onset date on or after the date of the first dose of IP through 28 days after the last dose. A serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was graded based on the participant's symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity as follows: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death.

Time frame: From randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data cut off date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm C

Population: The safety population includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine13 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel31 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE leading to death1 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE60 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE46 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel27 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE59 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related, Grade 3 or Higher TEAE35 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE22 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine18 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related Serious TEAE10 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine31 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine7 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction (DR) of IP23 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related (TR) TEAE Leading to D/C of IP12 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Death2 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel21 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE Leading to DR of IP23 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine18 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption (DI) of IP31 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine24 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel22 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE Leading to DI of IP27 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Discontinuation (D/C) of IP16 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel16 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin0 participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel11 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel13 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel19 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel19 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel50 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE Leading to DR of IP20 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin28 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin25 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin50 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin17 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Death1 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin17 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE leading to death0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel44 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin44 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE63 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE51 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE Leading to DI of IP44 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE62 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related, Grade 3 or Higher TEAE43 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE20 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related Serious TEAE9 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Discontinuation (D/C) of IP29 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related (TR) TEAE Leading to D/C of IP27 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction (DR) of IP20 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption (DI) of IP50 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine0 participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel17 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE Leading to DI of IP44 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAE60 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related, Grade 3 or Higher TEAE46 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE25 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related (TR) TEAE Leading to D/C of IP12 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction (DR) of IP25 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine13 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Gemcitabine9 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine25 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Gemcitabine23 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine43 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin12 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin20 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin43 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE54 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related Serious TEAE13 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Discontinuation (D/C) of IP15 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAE Leading to DR of IP23 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption (DI) of IP50 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE64 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DR of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TR TEAE leading to DI of nab-Paclitaxel0 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Gemcitabine49 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to D/C of Carboplatin15 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DR of Carboplatin21 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to DI of Carboplatin50 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE Leading to Death2 participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related TEAE leading to death1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)

The number of participants with dose modifications occurring during the treatment period. Dose reductions and interruptions are typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and /or treatment emergent adverse events/toxicities.

Time frame: From randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data-cut off of date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm C

Population: The Safety/Treated population includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DR for both IPs33.3 percentage of participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one dose missed for both IPs48.3 percentage of participants
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DI for both IPs38.3 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DR for both IPs46.9 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one dose missed for both IPs45.3 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DI for both IPs70.3 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one dose missed for both IPs56.3 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DI for both IPs73.4 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Modifications (Reductions and Interruptions)≥ one DR for both IPs51.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From All Study Treatment Due to TEAEs

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AEs that begin or worsen with an onset date on or after the date of the first dose of IP through 28 days after the last dose.

Time frame: From randomization through to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data-cut off of date of 16 Dec 2016; maximum treatment duration of study drug exposure was 108.3 weeks for Arm A, 83 weeks for Arm B, 110.1 weeks for Arm C

Population: The Safety/Treated population includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued From All Study Treatment Due to TEAEs21.7 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued From All Study Treatment Due to TEAEs26.6 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued From All Study Treatment Due to TEAEs21.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Initiated Cycle 6 Receiving Doublet Combination Therapy

The percentage of participants who initiated Cycle 6 receiving doublet combination therapy regardless of the need for dose modifications.

Time frame: Cycle 6

Population: ITT includes all randomized participants regardless of whether they received any IP or had any efficacy assessments collected. Those who did not have disease progression or had not died as of the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last radiologic assessment prior to the data cutoff date.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants Who Initiated Cycle 6 Receiving Doublet Combination Therapy55.7 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Initiated Cycle 6 Receiving Doublet Combination Therapy64.1 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants Who Initiated Cycle 6 Receiving Doublet Combination Therapy50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response by Investigator Assessment.

Percentage of participants with an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response according to RECIST 1.1 and defined as: Complete response-disappearance of all target lesions; partial response at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; stable disease-neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for Progressive disease (PD)• Progressive Disease- At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir.

Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 6 weeks; from date of randomization to data cut-off date of 16 December 2016; total length of time on study was 31 months for Arm A, 34 months for Arm B and 35 months for Arm C

Population: ITT includes all randomized participants regardless of whether they received any IP or had any efficacy assessments collected. Those who did not have disease progression or had not died as of the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last radiologic assessment prior to the data cutoff date.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Nab-Paclitaxel + GemcitabinePercentage of Participants With an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response by Investigator Assessment.39.3 percentage of participants
Arm B: Nab-Paclitaxel + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants With an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response by Investigator Assessment.73.4 percentage of participants
Arm C: Gemcitabine + CarboplatinPercentage of Participants With an Objective Complete or Partial Overall Response by Investigator Assessment.43.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026