Skip to content

Comparison of Absorption of Vitamin D in Cystic Fibrosis

Vehicles for the Absorption of Vitamin D in Cystic Fibrosis: Comparison of Powder vs Oil

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01880346
Enrollment
17
Registered
2013-06-19
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2015-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis, Vitamin D, absorption, vitamin Deficiency, fat soluble

Brief summary

The investigators predict that a powder pill form of vitamin D will be more effectively absorbed than an oil form of vitamin D in people diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see how well two different forms of vitamin D work in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Patients with Cystic Fibrosis have a hard time absorbing certain foods and often have low vitamin D levels. Studies show that vitamin D may help fight infections common in Cystic Fibrosis. The investigators would like to see if a powder pill form of vitamin D will work better than a pill mixed with oil. Each person will randomly receive either a powder pill or an oil based pill. Blood will be tested while during a 3-4 day hospital stay. The investigators plan to enroll no more than 24 patients with CF from Emory University Hospital for this study.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D Powder

Patients will be randomly assigned to a powder supplement of 100,000 IU vitamin D3. Randomization will be in blocks of 4 (meaning for every 4 subjects there will be 2 vitamin D and 2 placebo treated patients). Blood will be drawn by IV catheter at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after vitamin D3 dosing

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D Oil

Patients will be randomly assigned to an oil based supplement of 100,000 IU vitamin D3. Randomization will be in blocks of 4 (meaning for every 4 subjects there will be 2 vitamin D and 2 placebo treated patients). Blood will be drawn by IV catheter at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after vitamin D3 dosing

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult CF patients (age \>18 years * Able to tolerate oral medication * Expected to survive the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to obtain or declined informed consent from the subject and/or legally authorized representative * History of disorders associated with hypercalcemia * Current hypercalcemia (albumin-corrected serum calcium \>10.8 mg/dL or ionized calcium \>5.2 mg/dL) * Chronic kidney disease worse than stage III (\<60 ml/min), 7) Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)% predicted \<20% * Current significant hepatic dysfunction total bilirubin \> 2.5 mg/dL with direct bilirubin \> 1.0 mg/dL * Current use of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drugs * History of AIDS or illicit drug abuse * too ill to participate in study based on investigator's or study team's opinion * current enrollment in another intervention trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Absorption of vitamin D3 to blood72 hoursrates of absorption of D3 will be compared for either an oil based or powder form pill OVER 72 HOURS.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026