Skip to content

Increasing the Efficiency of Depression-screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback

Increasing the Efficiency of Depression-screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01879111
Acronym
DEPSCREEN-INFO
Enrollment
4151
Registered
2013-06-17
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2020-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease, Depressive Episode, Hypertension

Keywords

Depressive episode, Chronic ischaemic heart disease, Hypertension

Brief summary

Out-patients with coronary heart disease or hypertension will fill out a depression screening questionnaire while waiting in a cardiac clinic. Using a randomised-controlled study design half of the patients will receive a patient-targeted written screening feedback. This feedback contains information about depression in general, depression-severity adapted treatment guidelines and contact-information for treatment. Patients in the control group receive no direct screening-feedback but their cardiologist will be informed about the screening result. All patients with a positive screening-result will be contacted after one month and six months and asked for symptoms of depression, and their use of health care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of this minimal intervention on the course of depressive symptom in patients with known coronary heart disease or hypertension.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a minimal intervention on the course of depressive symptoms in patients with known coronary heart disease (CHD) or hypertension. By means of a depression screening and individual patient-targeted feedback the level of depression should decrease, the percentage of treated depressed patients should increase and health economic costs should be lowered. The main hypothesis is that screening plus targeted feedback results in a greater reduction of depression than screening only.

Interventions

Using a randomised-controlled study design half of the patients will receive a patient-targeted written screening feedback. This feedback contains information about depression in general, depression-severity adapted treatment guidelines and contact-information for treatment.

Sponsors

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gender: Both, male and female * Minimum Age: 18 Years * Maximum Age: no maximum age * Attendance in a cardiac clinic; * Clinical diagnosis of coronary heart disease or hypertension; * Age ≥ 18 years; * Sufficient language skills; * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Life threatening health status; * Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment; * Acute suicidal tendency; * Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties; * Not being able to fill out questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of depression one month after screening (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)One month after depression screening

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Level of depression six months after screening (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)One month and six months after screening
Proportion of patients treated for depression.One month and six months after screening
Direct and indirect health costsOne month and six months after screening
Quality-adjusted years of life and quality of life (EuroQol-5D)One month and six months after screening

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026