Epilepsy
Conditions
Keywords
Anticonvulsant, BIA 2-093
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is determine the interaction of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL, BIA 2-093) on the steadystate pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in patients and to evaluate the tolerability and safety of ESL administered concomitantly with phenytoin in patients.
Detailed description
This study was planned as a single-dose, open label phase (Phase A) followed by a multiple-dose, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover phase (Phase B) study in patients taking phenytoin. Phase B consisted of two 14-day treatment periods separated by a washout period of 10 to 15 days. Subjects continued their usual phenytoin scheme and received a single dose of ESL 1200 mg (Phase A) and either ESL (600 mg from Day 1 to 7 and 1200 mg from Day 8 to 14) or matching placebo once-daily for 14 days in each period. The study was prematurely terminated due to impossibility of recruiting the planned number of patients. Only 4 patients were admitted and this was considered a too small sample size to allow a reliable assessment of the potential interaction between ESL and phenytoin. Therefore, no pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed.
Interventions
Tablets containing ESL 600 mg
Hidantina® tablets containing 100 mg of phenytoin
Tablets containing matching placebo
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects aged between 18 and 65 years, inclusive. * Subjects who were on an established regimen of phenytoin monotherapy, which had been stable for at least 3 months. * Subjects who had clinical laboratory tests acceptable to the Investigator. * Subjects who were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (Ab) and human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV-1 and HIV-2) Ab tests at screening. * Subjects who were negative for alcohol and drugs of abuse at screening. * Subjects who were non-smokers or who smoked less than 10 cigarettes or equivalent per day. * Subjects who were able and willing to gave written informed consent. * (If female) She was not of childbearing potential by reason of surgery or, if of childbearing potential, she used one of the following methods of contraception: double barrier or intrauterine device. * (If female) She had a negative pregnancy test at screening.
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects who did not conform to the above inclusion criteria. * Subjects who had a clinically relevant history or presence of any disease that may interfere with the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the Investigational Products, or may affect its safety. * Subjects who had a history of relevant drug hypersensitivity. * Subjects who had a history of alcoholism or drug abuse in the last 2 years. * Subjects who consumed more than 21 units of alcohol a week. * Subjects who had one of the following findings on the electrocardiogram (ECG): sinus bradycardia, sinoatrial block, atrioventricular block of any degree. * Subjects who had a significant infection or known inflammatory process on screening and/or admission. * Subjects who had acute gastrointestinal symptoms at the time of screening and/or admission (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, heartburn). * Subjects who had used any drugs (other than phenytoin) that may affect the pharmacokinetic profile of the investigational products within 2 weeks of first dosing. * Subjects who had used any investigational drug and/or participated in any clinical trial within 3 months of their first admission to this study. * Subjects who had previously received ESL. * Subjects who had donated and/or received any blood or blood products within the previous 3 months prior to screening. * Subjects who were vegetarians, vegans and/or have medical dietary restrictions. * Subjects who cannot communicate reliably with the investigator. * Subjects who were unlikely to co-operate with the requirements of the study. * Subjects who were unwilling or unable to gave written informed consent. * (If female) She was pregnant or breast-feeding. * (If female) She was of childbearing potential and she did not use an approved effective contraceptive method.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Adverse Events reported | 3 weeks | Number of the adverse events reported |
Countries
Portugal