Skip to content

Promoting Smoking Cessation in Carpenters

Effective Communication Strategies for Promoting Smoking Cessation in Carpenters

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01878214
Enrollment
442
Registered
2013-06-14
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation

Keywords

Health communication, Smoking cessation, Health behavior, Construction industry, Audience segmentation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test an innovative and sustainable intervention to increase participation in a union-sponsored smoking cessation program among carpenters and floor layers. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing targeted messaging versus standard messaging. All subjects will receive information about the free, union-sponsored smoking cessation program. Subjects randomized to the intervention group will receive additional targeted materials to encourage enrollment in the union's smoking cessation program. The intervention will include monthly mailed and text messages. The investigators hypothesize that subjects who receive targeted messages will be more likely to enroll in the union-sponsored smoking cessation program, be more likely to show change in readiness to quit smoking, and be more likely to quit smoking compared to subjects who receive only standard messaging.

Detailed description

Specific Aim 1: Develop targeted health messages based on audience segmentation to encourage smokers to enroll in a comprehensive union-sponsored smoking cessation program. We will craft six specific health messages that appeal to four different audience segments: workers under 30 years old without children, workers under 30 with children, workers 30 years old or older without children, and workers 30 or older with children. Specific Aim 2: Conduct a randomized controlled trial of targeted messaging based on audience segmentation versus standard smoking cessation messaging. After conducting baseline surveys with union carpenters and floor layers, we will randomize current smokers (smoked within the last 30 days) into either the intervention or control group. * Control subjects will receive one standard mailing informing them about the free smoking cessation program available to union members. * Intervention subjects will receive the standard mailing in addition to six targeted smoking cessation messages delivered monthly by mail to their homes. Messages will be specific to one of four audience segments determined by age and parental status. In addition to a segment-specific anti-smoking message, each mailing will have contact information for the union smoking cessation program. Intervention subjects who consented to text messaging will also receive one booster text message each month with a shortened targeted message.

Interventions

6 targeted mailed messages and 6 booster text messages

1 informational letter

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Current smoker (smoked cigarettes within the last 30 days) * Eligible for union health benefits

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Enrollment in Smoking Cessation Programup to 12 months after recruitmentEnrollment records from the union-sponsored smoking cessation program

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quit Smoking7 months after baselineAt follow-up, subjects will report current smoking status. (Do you currently smoke (have you smoked in the last 30 days)? \[Yes, I smoked within the past 30 days; No, but I have smoked in the past 6 months; No, and I have not smoked in more than 6 months\]). We will report the % of subjects who have not smoked in the last 30 days and will compare the intervention group with the control group.
Changes in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)7 months after recruitmentAt baseline and follow-up, subjects will report smoking frequency (How often do you smoke? \[everyday, at least 4 days/week, 1-3 days/week, less than one day/week\]) and quantity (On days that you smoke, how many cigarettes do you have per day? \[10 or less, 11-20, 21-30, 31 or more\]). We will report the % of subjects who smoke less frequently and smoke fewer cigarettes per day at follow-up compared to baseline. We will compare the intervention group with the control group.
Changes in Readiness to Quit Smoking in the Next 6 Months7 months after recruitmentSubjects will answer the following question at both baseline and follow-up surveys: Are you seriously considering quitting smoking in the next 6 months? \[yes/no\]. We will report % of subjects who said no at baseline and yes at follow-up to determine changes in readiness to quit smoking and compare between intervention and control groups.
Changes in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting Smoking7 months after recruitmentAt baseline and follow-up, subjects will answer questions about motivation to quit smoking (How motivated are you to quit smoking at this time? \[scale: 1 (not at all) - 10 (extremely)\]) and thinking about quitting smoking (Each rung on this ladder represents where various smokers are in their thinking about quitting. Circle the number that indicates where you are now. \[0 (no thoughts of quitting) -10 (taking action to quit)\]). We will report the % of subjects who reported more motivation to quit and greater thinking about quitting at follow-up compared to baseline. We will compare the intervention group with the control group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We invited 1937 union members to participate; 1638 members completed the baseline survey (84.6%). Of those, 553 were current smokers, 1066 were non-smokers, and the smoking status was unknown for 19 individuals. The smoking rate was 33.8%, slightly lower than expected based on previous studies in this population.

Pre-assignment details

Of 553 current smokers, 111 were not eligible for study inclusion because they either did not sign a consent form (n=49), were not eligible for union benefits (n=57), or had too much data missing at baseline (n=5). The 442 eligible smokers were separated into the four segments and then randomized into the intervention group or the control group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
Targeted messaging Targeted messaging: 1 informational letter plus 6 targeted mailed messages and 6 booster text messages Standard messaging: 1 informational letter
223
Control Group
Standard messaging Standard messaging: 1 informational letter
219
Total442

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3536
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject187

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
221 Participants218 Participants439 Participants
Age, Continuous35.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.54
35.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.54
35.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.44
Region of Enrollment
United States
223 participants219 participants442 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
220 Participants218 Participants438 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2230 / 219
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2230 / 219

Outcome results

Primary

Enrollment in Smoking Cessation Program

Enrollment records from the union-sponsored smoking cessation program

Time frame: up to 12 months after recruitment

Population: Includes all study subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupEnrollment in Smoking Cessation Program5 participants
Control GroupEnrollment in Smoking Cessation Program4 participants
p-value: 0.76Chi-squared
Secondary

Changes in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting Smoking

At baseline and follow-up, subjects will answer questions about motivation to quit smoking (How motivated are you to quit smoking at this time? \[scale: 1 (not at all) - 10 (extremely)\]) and thinking about quitting smoking (Each rung on this ladder represents where various smokers are in their thinking about quitting. Circle the number that indicates where you are now. \[0 (no thoughts of quitting) -10 (taking action to quit)\]). We will report the % of subjects who reported more motivation to quit and greater thinking about quitting at follow-up compared to baseline. We will compare the intervention group with the control group.

Time frame: 7 months after recruitment

Population: Secondary outcomes were collected via self-report survey approximately 7 months after study enrollment; 345 subjects (78%) completed the follow-up survey. This outcome was only measured in those who reported smoking in the last 30 days (n=288, 83.5%).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupChanges in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting SmokingMore motivated to quit smoking14.9 percentage of participants
Intervention GroupChanges in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting SmokingGreater thinking about quitting smoking12.1 percentage of participants
Control GroupChanges in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting SmokingMore motivated to quit smoking23.8 percentage of participants
Control GroupChanges in Motivation to Quit Smoking and Thinking About Quitting SmokingGreater thinking about quitting smoking22.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Motivation to quitp-value: 0.09Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Thinking about quittingp-value: 0.04Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Changes in Readiness to Quit Smoking in the Next 6 Months

Subjects will answer the following question at both baseline and follow-up surveys: Are you seriously considering quitting smoking in the next 6 months? \[yes/no\]. We will report % of subjects who said no at baseline and yes at follow-up to determine changes in readiness to quit smoking and compare between intervention and control groups.

Time frame: 7 months after recruitment

Population: Secondary outcomes were collected via self-report survey approximately 7 months after study enrollment; 345 subjects (78%) completed the follow-up survey. This outcome was only measured in those who reported smoking in the last 30 days (n=288, 83.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupChanges in Readiness to Quit Smoking in the Next 6 Months9.2 percentage of participants
Control GroupChanges in Readiness to Quit Smoking in the Next 6 Months13.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.28Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Changes in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)

At baseline and follow-up, subjects will report smoking frequency (How often do you smoke? \[everyday, at least 4 days/week, 1-3 days/week, less than one day/week\]) and quantity (On days that you smoke, how many cigarettes do you have per day? \[10 or less, 11-20, 21-30, 31 or more\]). We will report the % of subjects who smoke less frequently and smoke fewer cigarettes per day at follow-up compared to baseline. We will compare the intervention group with the control group.

Time frame: 7 months after recruitment

Population: Secondary outcomes were collected via self-report survey approximately 7 months after study enrollment; 345 subjects (78%) completed the follow-up survey. This outcome was only measured in those who reported smoking in the last 30 days (n=288, 83.5%).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupChanges in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)Smoked less frequently14.8 percentage of participants
Intervention GroupChanges in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)Smoked fewer cigarettes per day24.8 percentage of participants
Control GroupChanges in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)Smoked less frequently12.2 percentage of participants
Control GroupChanges in Smoking Behaviors (Frequency and Quantity)Smoked fewer cigarettes per day19.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Smoking frequencyp-value: 0.63Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Smoking quantityp-value: 0.3Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Quit Smoking

At follow-up, subjects will report current smoking status. (Do you currently smoke (have you smoked in the last 30 days)? \[Yes, I smoked within the past 30 days; No, but I have smoked in the past 6 months; No, and I have not smoked in more than 6 months\]). We will report the % of subjects who have not smoked in the last 30 days and will compare the intervention group with the control group.

Time frame: 7 months after baseline

Population: Secondary outcomes were collected via self-report survey approximately 7 months after study enrollment; 345 subjects (78%) completed the follow-up survey.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupQuit Smoking17.1 percentage of participants
Control GroupQuit Smoking16.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.79Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026