Skip to content

Qvar vs FP in Pediatrics

Comparative Effectiveness of Extrafine Hydrofluoroalkane Beclometasone Versus Fluticasone in Paediatric Patients - a Retrospective, Real-life Observational Study in a uk Primary Care Asthma Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01877954
Enrollment
2654
Registered
2013-06-14
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone, fluticasone, paediatrics, real-life, observational, primary care

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study was to compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of asthma management in paediatric patients in the UK on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy as extra-fine HFA-BDP (Qvar®) pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) compared with fluticasone propionate (FP) pMDI.

Detailed description

Comparison of asthma control with extrafine-particle hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone (EF HFA-BDP) vs fluticasone propionate (FP) in paediatric patients (5-11year olds). Patients identified from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Two analyses were conducted: 1. Comparison of outcomes achieved by EF HFA-BDP and FP in 5-6year old patients with those achieved in 7-11yr old patients. 2. Comparison of outcomes achieved by EF HFA-BDP used with or without a spacer to those achieved by standard particle fluticasone propionate (FP) used with a spacer.

Interventions

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Research in Real-Life Ltd
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged: 5-11 years 2. Evidence of asthma (diagnostic code and/or current asthma therapy); 3. Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (during which the step-up to FP/SAL occurred) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).

Exclusion criteria

1. Had any chronic respiratory disease, except asthma, at any time; and/or 2. Patients on maintenance oral steroids during baseline year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proxy risk domain asthma controlOne year outcome periodDefined as the absence of the following during the one-year outcome period: 1. Asthma-related: * Hospital attendance or admission, OR * A&E attendance, OR * Out of hours attendance, OR * Out-patient department attendance 2. GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection 3. Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids .
Asthma exacerbation rate ratioOne year outcome periodWhere exacerbations are defined as an occurrence of: Defined as an occurrence of: 1. Asthma related: * Hospital admission, OR * A&E attendance, OR 2. Use of acute oral steroids.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment successOne year outcome periodAsthma control and no change in therapy
Overall asthma controlOne year outcome periodRisk domain asthma control as defined above, plus (a)Average prescribed daily dose of albuterol or terbutaline of ≤200mg
Use of short-acting beta2-agonist (reliever) therapyOne year outcome period
Adherence to ICS therapyOne year outcome periodCategorised as: \<50%, 50-\<70%, 70-\<100%, ≥100%.
Hospitalisation ratesOne year outcome periodAsthma-related hospitalisations 1. Definite: Hospitalisations coded with an asthma read code 2. Definite and probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code and uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of an asthma read code Respiratory hospitalisations 1. Definite: Hospitalisations coded with a lower respiratory code 2. Definite and probable: Hospitalisations with a lower respiratory read code and uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of a lower respiratory read code

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026