Skip to content

Wearable Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Device in Knee Osteoarthritis: Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Wearable Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Device in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: a Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01877278
Enrollment
66
Registered
2013-06-13
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Pulsed electromagnetic fields, Device, Pain, Pressure algometry

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a wearable device using pulse electromagnetic fields on pain intensity reduction, measured by visual analogue score (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), in patients affected by osteoarthritis Secondary aim is the evaluate the effect on knee effusion reduction, when present and to evaluate pain intensity changes corrected by pain threshold measured by pressure algometry.

Interventions

DEVICEWearable pulsed electromagnetic fields

Sponsors

University of Messina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a diagnosis of primary OA of the knee according to the ACR criteria, including radiologic evidence of OA * age \>40 years * symptomatic disease for at least 6 months prior to enrollment * persistent pain despite receiving the maximum tolerated doses of conventional medical therapy, including acetaminophen (4 gm/day) and/or a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), with persistent pain defined as a minimum mean score of 25 mm on the visual analog scales (VAS) for global pain (0-100-mm range for each) daily pain during the month prior to study enrollment * ability to attend followup appointments

Exclusion criteria

* secondary causes of OA * local or systemic infection * diabetes mellitus * systemic arthritis * allergy to anesthetic agent or contrast material * coagulopathy * anticoagulant therapy * had previous IA steroid injection * avascular necrosis of bone * patients who are on specific OA pharmacological therapy (NSAIDS, opioids) for more than 2 weeks prior enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4baseline and 4 weeksvisual analogue scale (VAS) is a validated self report instrument assessing self report pain intensity Possible scores ranges:from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the maximum of pain)
Changes From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4baseline and 4 weeksMulti-item questionnaire used to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items), Stiffness (2 items) and Physical Function (17 items). Score Range: On the Likert Scale version, the scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-50, stiffness=0-20, physical function=0-170. A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales. A higher score represents a worse outcome.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active
emitting group Wearable pulsed electromagnetic fields
30
Placebo
non emitting device Wearable pulsed electromagnetic fields
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActivePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Region of Enrollment
Italy
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4

visual analogue scale (VAS) is a validated self report instrument assessing self report pain intensity Possible scores ranges:from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the maximum of pain)

Time frame: baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ActiveChange From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4VAS (baseline)67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
ActiveChange From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4VAS (after 1 month of treatment)50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4VAS (baseline)63.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Perception Measured on Visual Analog Score (VAS) at Week 4VAS (after 1 month of treatment)61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
p-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Changes From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4

Multi-item questionnaire used to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items), Stiffness (2 items) and Physical Function (17 items). Score Range: On the Likert Scale version, the scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-50, stiffness=0-20, physical function=0-170. A total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales. A higher score represents a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ActiveChanges From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4WOMAC total (baseline)136 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 49
ActiveChanges From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4WOMAC total (4 weeks)111 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 48
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4WOMAC total (baseline)129.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.8
PlaceboChanges From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Week 4WOMAC total (4 weeks)126 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
p-value: =0.0001t-test, 2 sided
p-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026