Skip to content

Instructor-led Simulation Training Versus Self-directed Simulator Training During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitation

Instructor-led Simulation Training Versus Self-directed Simulator Training During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitation - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01875900
Enrollment
38
Registered
2013-06-12
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2018-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatology, Resuscitation

Keywords

neonatal resuscitation, video-assisted learning, self-directed training, simulation, simulation-based training, simulation-based medical education, objective structured clinical examination

Brief summary

Simulation-based training has been widely implemented in medical education. According to educational theories, simulation-based medical education (SBME) is associated with significant advantages, which has been investigated and proved by many studies. However, the value of SBME in comparison to other instructional methodologies remains largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to directly compare two instructional methods for neonatal resuscitation training.

Interventions

OTHERVideo-assisted learning and self-directed training

The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) DVD will be provided for video study and a low-fidelity newborn manikin for self-directed resuscitation training (90 minutes training time, six students per group).

OTHERSimulation-based neonatal resuscitation training

Students will learn initial assessment of newborns and basic resuscitation skills and actively apply these skills during simulated clinical scenarios both with a low- and high-fidelity manikin (90 minutes training time, six students per group).

Sponsors

Medical University of Graz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fifth-year medical students prior to their mandatory OSCE * Signing of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate in the study The first two OSCEs in July and August will be part of a pilot study. The combined results of both examinations will be used for a sample size calculation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neonatal resuscitation performanceStudents will take part in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) within two weeks after having participated in the course.Students will perform neonatal resuscitation as part of an OSCE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of instructional methodology, success of OSCE preparation, transferability of skills into patient carewithin two weeksStudents will be asked to rate the subjective effectiveness of the respective instructional methodology, success of OSCE preparation, and transferability of skills into patient care using a questionnaire.

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026