Skip to content

Comprehensive Surgical Coaching

Surgical Coaching -Using Error Debriefing, Behavioral Modeling and Error Recognition to Enhance Surgical Skill

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01875679
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-06-12
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Technical Skill, Technical Errors in Surgery

Keywords

Surgical education, Deliberate practice, Debriefing, Behaviour modelling

Brief summary

Simulation in surgical skills training is widely accepted as a necessary step to improve surgical training outside the operating room. Simulation predominately focuses on teaching a specific task or procedure. Once this task is acquired ongoing optimization of technique is desirable. Commonly ongoing skills assessment occurs in the form of peer feedback throughout training rotations. This feedback is frequently subjective and of variable educational use. Identifying ongoing technical training needs and enabling personalized objective feedback represents an important training concept that has not yet been formally used in resident training. The specific goal of this study is to prove the effect of a comprehensive surgical coaching (CSC) approach which combines concepts of behavior modeling training, task debriefing and error recognition to improve overall surgical technique without additional technical skills training.

Detailed description

Design The study design is a randomized, controlled trial involving evaluation of a study and a conventionally trained group at pretest and posttest. Participants The study and control groups will consist of senior surgical residents (PGY 3-5) and surgical fellows involved in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Inclusion: Since concurrent operative training in the operating room (OR) in the technique of MIS is a prerequisite for this study, only residents and fellows on rotations with a practice focus on MIS during the time period of the study will be eligible for participation. Exclusion: Individuals with severe illnesses precluding performance in the OR will not be included. Outcome measures: Surgical performance will be assessed using a global rating scale as well as through tabulation of observed intraoperative technical errors. Primary outcome measure is surgical skill level before and after targeted training.

Interventions

OTHERComprehensive Surgical Coaching
OTHERConventional Surgical Training

Surgical training as per participant's residency program

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* surgical residents and fellows on rotations with a practice focus on minimally invasive surgery during the time period of the study

Exclusion criteria

* individuals with severe illnesses precluding performance in the OR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical Technical SkillAfter 8 weeks of participationSurgical skill measures as recorded on a procedure specific global rating scale, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and bariatric OSATS (BOSATS) scores and by tabulation of technical errors, Generic Error Rating Tool (GERT) observed during the index procedures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Learning curvesThroughout 8 weeks of participationDevelopment of skill and reduction of errors will be assessed in relation to number of procedures performed to obtain learning curves for each study group. Surgical technical skill will be assessed by OSATS and BOSATS scales, errors will be recorded by GERT checklist

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026