Skip to content

Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Manual vs. Automatic Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation With Surgical Leads

Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Manual vs. Automatic Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation With Surgical Leads

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01874899
Acronym
RestoreSensor
Enrollment
18
Registered
2013-06-11
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Refractory Low Back and Leg Pain

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish the extent that chronic pain patients implanted with surgical, laminectomy-type, leads experience position-related variation in spinal cord stimulation therapy and to investigate the effects of manual versus automatic position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation on clinical outcome.

Detailed description

A single-center, prospective, randomized study with a two-arm crossover design. The primary objective of this study is to establish threshold and therapeutic stimulation parameters for the RestoreSensor neurostimulator in response to postural changes. The secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation with manual versus automatic position-adaptive settings for chronic refractory low back and/or extremity pain.

Interventions

DEVICERestoreSensor Neurostimulation

Sponsors

Justin Parker Neurological Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletally mature adults between 18 and 70 years old * Patients with chronic refractory back and/or leg pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome, post-laminectomy pain, radicular pain syndrome or radiculopathy refractory to conservative and surgical interventions * \> 50% pain reduction during the trail period * Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements * Willing to sign a study specific informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous SCS treatment * Surgically remediable spinal condition * Active local or systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stimulation amplitude changes in response to postural changes6 monthsThreshold and therapeutic stimulation parameters in different postures: lying right, lying left, lying prone, lying supine, upright and upright active will be collected for manual and sensor-driven position-adaptive stimulation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep quality improvement6 monthsPittsburg Sleep Quality Index Oswestry Disability Index

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability score improvement6 monthsOswestry Disability Index
Pain scores6 monthsNumeric pain scale
Patient satisfaction6 monthsLikert scale

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026