Skip to content

Is Multifactorial Nutritional Treatment for Undernutrition in Older Adults in Primary Care Cost-effective?

Is Multifactorial Nutritional Treatment for Undernutrition in Older Adults in Primary Care Cost-effective?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01873456
Acronym
CES
Enrollment
120
Registered
2013-06-10
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2022-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frail Older Adults

Brief summary

The hypothesis is that there is a profit potential by implementing a multifactorial nutritional intervention among frail elderly since this will result in an improved nutritional status, functional capacity and improved quality of life.

Interventions

OTHERmultifactorial nutritional intervention

Sponsors

Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Screening for nutritional risk

Exclusion criteria

* terminal condition or do not wish to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifeup to 6 monthsEuroQol (EQ-5D) is a questionnaire with five questions to be answered in three categories. The five questions deal of movement, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression and any problems with this

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nutritional statusup to 6 monthsAssessment of weight
Hand grip strengthup to 6 monthsResidents and clients hand grip strength is determined using the dynamometer The dynamometer consists of a narrow handle with two strings as the older must squeezing so hard, they manage three times. The highest value will be used.
Costsup to 6 monthsHere is used information on additional costs of nutrition efforts, which on the one hand involves all costs associated with the effort, while on the other hand also be seen on the savings that can be attached to the outcome of the effort. Since the purpose is to illustrate the cost-effectiveness, the net profit on the cost side is also compared with the effect of nutritional intervention in terms of improved quality of life, and hence would be able to shed light on efforts from both resource use and a health effect
Activities of Daily Living and cognitive performanceup to 6 monthsData is collected by Means of the resident assessment instrument
physical strengthup to 6 months30 seconds chair stand is used

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026