Skip to content

Endoscopic Surgery for Bariatric Revision After Weight Loss Failure

Apollo OverStitch for Bariatric Surgery Revision After Weight Loss Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01871896
Enrollment
24
Registered
2013-06-07
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2023-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Morbid Obesity, Weight Loss

Keywords

Surgical Endoscopy, Morbid Obesity, Weight Loss, Bariatrics, Surgical Revision

Brief summary

Morbid obesity and its associated metabolic diseases are on the rise in the United States. Currently, the best treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery where both roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy offer substantial weight loss. Unfortunately, 20% of patients who undergo bariatric surgery fail to lose enough weight defined as less than 50% of excess body weight loss or regain of weight. For those patients who fail to lose weight after bariatric surgery and have failed maximal medical therapy and diet supervision, the treatment is re-operation and revision. Re-operation of the abdomen carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. The investigators propose to use the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device that has already been approved by the FDA as an option for bariatric surgery revision without having to re-operate on the patient. The investigators believe that the endoscopic technique may be able to provide weight loss without having to re-operate on the patient.

Detailed description

The most effective weight loss procedures in the United States are both roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)where the majority are performed laparoscopically. Estimated excess body weight loss (EBWL) is \>50% at the end of one year. However, nearly 20% of patients fail to meet the estimated EBWL or they may experience weight gain recidivism. The first step is nutritional counseling, medically supervised diets, and medical therapy. Surgery would be for those who still fail to lose weight despite the aforementioned efforts. It is hypothesized that failure of weight loss for RYGB is gastrojejunostomy (GJ) dilation defined as \>2 cm. Surgical treatment would require revision of this dilation. Unfortunately many of these revision procedures cannot be done laparoscopically given dense intra-abdominal adhesions. This will require conversion to an open surgery in a morbidly obese patient thus raising postoperative morbidity and mortality estimated to range between 15%-50%. The investigators propose to use the endoscopic suturing device designed by Apollo EndoSurgery to decrease the GJ dilation to 5-6 mm thus causing restriction, delayed food transit time, and promote early satiety. These efforts will limit overall caloric intake thereby promoting weight loss. It is thought that patients with previous SG may have a dilation of their stomach. The investigators propose a pyloric cerclage using the Apollo EndoSurgery suturing device by decreasing the opening of the pylorus thus achieving the same goals that the investigators proposed above with RYGB revision. Endoscopic procedures are same day procedures with little morbidity and mortality when compared to laparoscopic or open bariatric surgery revision.

Interventions

DEVICEEndoscopic Suturing to Create Early Satiety

Evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic suturing for weight loss.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Previous Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) * Failure to lose \>50% of their excess body weight after 1 year * Failure of weight loss despite maximal medical therapy and medically-supervised diets

Exclusion criteria

* Esophageal Stricture * Marginal Ulcer at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis * Non-compliance with bariatric follow-up * Gastric ulcers * Paraesophageal hernias

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Weight Loss3 months after procedureWe will track patient's weight after their endoscopic bariatric surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance2 yearsWe will be monitoring patient's tolerance to this procedure and evaluate their satisfaction via a short questionnaire.
Number of Participants With Resolved Co-morbidities2 yearsWe will track the patient's weight loss and see if their obesity-related co-morbidities resolve.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

24 patients were recruited 23 underwent the proposed procedure

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Weight Gain
Patients who previously underwent bariatric surgery who failed to lose the expected weight or regained weight. Endoscopic Suturing to Create Early Satiety: Evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic suturing for weight loss.
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeight Gain
Age, Continuous47.6 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Weight Loss

We will track patient's weight after their endoscopic bariatric surgery.

Time frame: 3 months after procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsMean Weight Loss13.3 Pounds
Secondary

Number of Participants With Resolved Co-morbidities

We will track the patient's weight loss and see if their obesity-related co-morbidities resolve.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Study ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Resolved Co-morbidities23 Participants
Secondary

Tolerance

We will be monitoring patient's tolerance to this procedure and evaluate their satisfaction via a short questionnaire.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome measure. Milestone visit dates at which surveys were going to be provided were not followed through by patients resulting in the lack of data collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026