Skip to content

The Dorsal Homodigital Island Flap Based on the Dorsal Branch of the Digital Artery: A Review of 171 Cases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01871103
Enrollment
173
Registered
2013-06-06
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Digital Defects, Sensory Reconstruction of Digits, Soft Tissue Defect

Keywords

Soft tissue defect, dorsal branch of the digital artery, dorsal branch of the digital nerve, dorsal homodigital island flap

Brief summary

Soft tissue reconstruction in the finger continues to evolve. The dorsum of the finger is a reliable flap donor site in reconstructive hand surgery because of its similar quality to the original. The dorsal homodigital island flap can be used as a reliable alternative for reconstructing small to moderate defects of the fingers. In this retrospective study, the investigators would evaluate the efficacy of the technique for tissue reconstruction in different regions of the finger, with an emphasis on sensibility, pain and donor site morbidity.

Detailed description

At final follow-up, sensory restoration of the flap is measured using the static 2-point discrimination test and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. We evaluate pain sensations of the reconstructed fingers and donor sites with a visual analog scale. The system consist of a 10 cm line that is grouped into mild (0-3 cm), moderate (4-6 cm) and severe (7-10 cm). Active motion of the joints is measured using a goniometer. The motion arcs of the reconstructed fingers are compared with the opposite side.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe dorsal homodigital island flap

The dorsal homodigital island flap is used for tissue reconstruction in different regions of the finger.

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Tangshan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* the soft tissue defect in one finger or in multiple fingers * a defect \> 1.5 cm and \< 3 cm in length * necessity to preserve finger length * a patient between 15 and 60 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* injuries to the dorsum of the finger or to the course of the vascular pedicle that precluded its use as the donor * a defect≤1.5 cm or ≥3 cm in length * a soft tissue defect of the thumb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Static 2-point discrimination test18 months to 24 monthsThe test point is at the center of the flap. Each area was tested 3 times with a Discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). We stop at 4mm as a limit of 2PD and considered this normal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cold intolerance18 months to 24 monthsWe access the cold intolerance of the injured and donor fingers using the self-administered Cold Intolerance Severity Score questionnaire10 that is rated into mild, moderate, severe, and extreme (0-25, 26-50, 51-75 and 76-100).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026