Skip to content

Myoring Versus Keraring Implantation for Keratoconus

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01869517
Enrollment
23
Registered
2013-06-05
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Brief summary

Various approaches, including surgical and non-surgical management have been proposed for keratoconus. One of the surgical procedures is Intrastromal Corneal Ring implantations that have been designed to achieve refractive readjustment by flattening the cornea. There are different models of Intrastromal Corneal rings available: intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) such as Keraring and intrastromal corneal continuous ring (ICCR) like Myoring. Most studies of these two types of ring implantation outcomes are retrospective case series. Thus, this Randomized Clinical Trial study was designed with the aim of Comparing visual and refractive outcomes and complications of insertion Myoring versus Keraring using Femtosecond laser. Keratoconus patients with compound myopic astigmatism who meet the inclusion criteria will randomly allocated to the Keraring and Myoring groups. Subsequently, the clinical outcomes of two groups will be compared at one,3 and 6 months after surgery.

Interventions

OTHERintrastromal corneal ring segments (Keraring) implantation
OTHERIntrastromal corneal continuous ring (Myoring) implantation

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

* keratoconus patients and : * age between 20 to 40 * corneal thickness\> 380 microns * mean keratometry between 44 to 60 D * clear central cornea * Patients should be discontinued their contact lenses for 3 weeks prior to the exams * contact lenses in tolerance * 20/200\<visual acuity \<20/30

Exclusion criteria

* Positive pregnancy test * Breast-feeding * History of glaucoma, cataract, vernal and atopic keratoconjunctivitis * History of previous ophthalmologic surgery, keratorefractive surgery on the operative eye * Dry eye * Corneal stromal disorders * History of herpetic keratitis * Pellucid marginal degeneration * Corneal grafts * Retinal disorders * Nystagmus and uncooperative disposition * Neuro-ophthalmologic disorders * Intraocular pressure \<10 mmHg or \>21 mmHg * Patients with autoimmune, connective tissue disorders, diabetes and immunosuppressive drugs users * Hyperopia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
uncorrected visual acuity6 monthsSnellen E chart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal irregularities (3, 5 and 7 mm of central cornea)6 monthsGalilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer ( Ziemer, Switzerland)
Front & back corneal elevation6 monthsGalilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer ( Ziemer, Switzerland)
Corneal aberrometry6 monthsGalilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer ( Ziemer, Switzerland)
Corneal thickness6monthsGalilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer ( Ziemer, Switzerland)
Corneal hysteresis & corneal resistance factor6 monthsOcular response Analyzer (reichert ophthalmic instruments, Buffalo,New York ,USA)
Intra and postoperative complications (glare, night vision problem, migration, extrusion, infection)Intra and post operatienclinical examination, patients history
Corneal eccentricity6 monthsGalilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer ( Ziemer, Switzerland)

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactAlireza Baradaran-Rafii
labbafi@hotmail.com009822591616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026