Skip to content

Impact of Triclosan-coated Suture on Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery

Impact of Triclosan-coated Suture on Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01869257
Enrollment
279
Registered
2013-06-05
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2013-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Resection

Keywords

triclosan, colorectal, surgery, surgical site infection

Brief summary

Despite adequate antimicrobial prophylaxis and perioperative correction of risk factors, surgical site infections (SSI) remain the most frequent complication of colorectal resection (range 10-17%). Several strategies may be implemented to prevent SSI. Among these, the use of local antimicrobial agents seems successful. The primary aim of the present trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a surgical suture, coated with Triclosan a synthetic soluble antimicrobial agent, in reducing the SSI rate after colorectal operations.

Detailed description

This was a non-sponsored, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Two hundred and seventy-three patients candidate to colorectal resection were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were: age \< 18 or \> 85 years, pregnancy, peritonitis, peritoneal contamination during operation, ongoing infections, ASA score \> 3, denied consent. 135 were randomized to the treatment arm and 136 to the control arm. Treatment consisted of abdominal wound closure by suturing peritoneum, fascia, subcutaneous tissue, and skin with Polyglactin 910 Triclosan-coated suture (treatment arm) or with Polyglactin without Triclosan (control arm). SSI were defined according to the Atlanta CDC. Patients were followed up by office visits for 30 days after discharge.

Interventions

The patients in the treated arm will have the abdominal wound sutured with triclosan-coated suture

DEVICEregular suture

The control arm will have the abdominal wound sutured with a regular non-coated suture

Sponsors

University of Milano Bicocca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients candidate to elective colorectal resection

Exclusion criteria

* no consent * peritonitis * hypersensitivity to triclosan * ASA \> 3 * ongoing infections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of surgical site infection30 daysthe incidence of superficial and deep wound infection in patients who underwent colorectal resection will be determined by a blind observer according to the Atlanta CDC definition. The unit of measure will be number of wound infection over the number of treated or control patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
overall wound complications30 days

Other

MeasureTime frame
length of hospital stay30 days

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026