Skip to content

The Effect and Mechanism of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction by Endobronchial Valve in Korean Emphysema Patients

The Effect and Mechanism of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction by Endobronchial Valve in Korean Emphysema Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01869205
Enrollment
43
Registered
2013-06-05
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2017-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Emphysema

Keywords

COPD, Emphysema, Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, Endobronchial valve

Brief summary

To assess efficacy of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in Korean emphysema patients

Detailed description

The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is high (13.4%). In addition, COPD ranked 10th among the causes of death in Korea, and rose to 7th in 2008. Airflow limitation of COPD is caused by a mixture of small airway disease (obstructive bronchiolitis) and parenchyma destruction (emphysema). Bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drugs, such as corticosteroids are effective to obstructive bronchiolitis. However, these drugs are not effective to emphysema. Lung volume reduction was devised to remove hyperinflated lung, and to function remaining lung. Surgical lung volume reduction showed improving survival in selected emphysema patients. However, surgical lung volume reduction have bee performed rarely due to significant surgery-related mortality. In this regard, non-surgical lung volume reduction methods have been developed. Of them, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction by endobronchial one-way valve is mostly used method and showed lower early complications than surgery. The bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valve was proved its efficacy and safety in several large clinical trials. Although there were procedure-related complications such as acute exacerbation of COPD, pneumonia, or hemoptysis, patients receiving endobronchial valves showed improved lung functions, exercise capacity and quality of life. The endobronchial valves got approved for Conformity to European (CE) Mark in Europe. In follow-up study for patients with endobronchial valves, their efficacy and survival of patients were dependent on atelectasis induced by valves. Collateral ventilation plays a key role in endobronchial valve-induced atelectasis. Therefore, assessment of collateral ventilation should be preceded before inserting endobronchial valve. Computed tomography (CT) can visualize and characterize morphologic change of lung of patients with COPD. Lung perfusion and ventilation CT protocols were developed for quantitative assessment of COPD before and after medical treatment. The CT protocols were expected to select optimal patients for endobronchial valves and to evaluate their efficacy. We attempt to evaluate efficacy of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using lung perfusion and ventilation CT and other outcomes.

Interventions

One-way endobronchial valves are placed in segmental bronchi of the most hyperinflated and least perfused lobe of the emphysematous lungs on computed tomography (CT). Before the procedure, we confirm that the target lobe has no collateral ventilation with other lobes using Chartis® System (Pulmonx, Inc. Redwood City, CA, USA).

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Bronchoscopioc lung volume reduction by endobronchial valve

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age more than 40 and below 75 * Patients with smoking history and heterogenous emphysema on chest CT * Advanced emphysema (FEV1/FVC \<70%, FEV1 of 15-45%, TLC \>100% and RV \>150% predicted) * Persistent symptoms refractory to treatment * PaCO2 \<50 mmHg and PaO2 \>45 mmHg * Body mass index (BMI) ≤31.1 kg/m2 (men) or ≤32.3 kg/m2 (women) * 6-min walk distance \>140 m after pulmonary rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

* Diffusing capacity (DLco) \<20% predicted * Large bullae (exceed 5 cm) * Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency * History of thoracotomy * Excessive sputum production (throughout the week) * Severe pulmonary hypertension ( systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 45mmHg, estimated from the peak velocity of a tricuspid regurgitant jet by doppler echocardiography) * Acute respiratory infection * Unstable angina, congestive heart failure, or acute myocardial infarction in 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative change of lung volume on computed tomographyBefore procedure and 12 weeks after procedureLung perfusion and ventilation computed tomography protocols

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary function testBefore procedure and 12 weeks after procedureForced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC), Total lung capacity (TLC), Residual volume (RV)
Exercise capacityBefore procedure and 12 weeks after procedureSix-minute walk distance test
Healthcare quality of lifeBefore procedure and 12 weeks after procedureSt. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026