Skip to content

Weightbearing Assessment of Tarsal Instability

In-Vivo Physiologic Weight-Bearing Assessment of Tarsal Instability: Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01868789
Acronym
WBCT
Enrollment
23
Registered
2013-06-05
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2018-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult-acquired Flatfoot Disorder (AAFD)

Keywords

Adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD), flexible flatfoot, computed tomography (CT)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the average joint motion and joint axis orientation of the hindfoot bones between patients diagnosed with adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD) and a control group of patients without foot deformity, using weight-bearing CT technology.

Interventions

RADIATIONWeightbearing CT

Sponsors

CurveBeam LLC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Ohio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Symptomatic group: Inclusion Criteria: 1\. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) diagnosed with Stage 2 AAFD

Exclusion criteria

1. previous surgery 2. infection 3. tumor in the affected foot 4. pregnancy Control group: Inclusion Criteria: 1\. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) without foot deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicular1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearingRelative motion, which is the position of the full weightbearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) navicular in comparison to the touch down weightbearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) navicular position, will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across these two points on one CT scan. The difference between the two positions is reported below.
Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearingRelative motion across joint segments will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across two time points: touch-down bearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) and full-weight bearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) as measured on CT.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)
Weightbearing CT scan of affected foot Weightbearing CT
7
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)
Weightbearing CT scan of normal foot Weightbearing CT
12
Total19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeightbearing CT (Control Group)TotalWeightbearing CT (AAFD Group)
Age, Continuous52.2 years49.0 years43.6 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants19 participants7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants13 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicular

Relative motion, which is the position of the full weightbearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) navicular in comparison to the touch down weightbearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) navicular position, will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across these two points on one CT scan. The difference between the two positions is reported below.

Time frame: 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing NavicularTranslation of the Navicular3.56 mmStandard Deviation 2.15
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: x component-0.1666 mmStandard Deviation 0.338
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: y component0.867 mmStandard Deviation 0.159
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: z component-0.083 mmStandard Deviation 0.331
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: z component0.084 mmStandard Deviation 0.171
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing NavicularTranslation of the Navicular4.36 mmStandard Deviation 2.16
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: y component0.950 mmStandard Deviation 0.045
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicularaxis of navicular rotation: x component-0.170 mmStandard Deviation 0.188
Primary

Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing

Relative motion across joint segments will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across two time points: touch-down bearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) and full-weight bearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) as measured on CT.

Time frame: 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Weightbearing CT (AAFD Group)Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing4.11 degreesStandard Deviation 2.19
Weightbearing CT (Control Group)Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing5.99 degreesStandard Deviation 3.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026