Skip to content

Effect of Buffered Numbing Solution on Patients With Toothaches

Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01868776
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-06-05
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2020-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of buffered lidocaine (a numbing solution) on the ability to numb patients with toothaches. Buffered anesthetic (numbing) solutions have shown promise in some medical and dental research. Patients presenting with toothaches will be given either a buffered numbing solution or a nonbuffered numbing solution. Neither the patient nor the operator will know which solution they will receive. Root canal treatment will be performed on the tooth and the ability of the buffered versus non-buffered numbing solutions will be compared.

Interventions

DRUGnonbuffered lidocaine

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (toothache) in a mandibular posterior tooth (back/bottom tooth) with moderate to severe pain * ages 18 -65 years of age * in good health (ASA I or II) * able to grant informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to lidocaine (numbing solution * significant medical problem (ASA III or IV) * have taken CNS depressants or analgesic medications within the last 24 hours * pregnancy or lactating * non-English speaking * inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)pain at time of treatment (after buffered versus nonbuffered numbing solution) average of 15 minutes after injection
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.approximately 15 minutes after injection100 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) block using either 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate in a double-blind manner. For the buffered solution, each cartridge was buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to produce a final concentration of 0.18 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate. Fifteen minutes after administration of the IAN block, profound lip numbness was confirmed and endodontic access was initiated. Success was determined as no or mild pain on access or instrumentation of the root canal. Higher numbers on the VAS are indicative of more pain and less success and the VAS scale ranged from 0 to 170 mm.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buffered
buffered lidocaine
50
Nonbuffered
nonbuffered lidocaine
50
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBufferedNonbufferedTotal
Age, Continuous34.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants50 participants100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants29 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants21 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.

100 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) block using either 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate in a double-blind manner. For the buffered solution, each cartridge was buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to produce a final concentration of 0.18 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate. Fifteen minutes after administration of the IAN block, profound lip numbness was confirmed and endodontic access was initiated. Success was determined as no or mild pain on access or instrumentation of the root canal. Higher numbers on the VAS are indicative of more pain and less success and the VAS scale ranged from 0 to 170 mm.

Time frame: approximately 15 minutes after injection

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Buffered LidocaineEffect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.32 percentage of participants
Nonbuffered LidocaineEffect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.40 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)

Time frame: pain at time of treatment (after buffered versus nonbuffered numbing solution) average of 15 minutes after injection

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Buffered LidocainePercent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)16 Participants
Nonbuffered LidocainePercent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)20 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026