Skip to content

Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant (PALS) in Video and Robotic Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety of Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant in Video Assisted and Robotic Assisted Thoracotomy Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01867658
Enrollment
207
Registered
2013-06-04
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2017-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

Pleural Air Leak, Pulmonary resection, Video Assisted, Robotic Assisted

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety of the Progel® PALS, including the Progel® Extended Applicator Spray Tips, in sealing or reducing intraoperative air leaks in patients undergoing video assisted or robotic assisted thoracoscopic (VATS/Robotic) surgeries. The data collected in this clinical study will supplement the Approved PMA P010047 Progel® PALS product.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, open label, multi-center clinical study designed to assess the safety of the Progel® PALS product, including the Extended Applicator Spray Tip, when used in Video Assisted and Robotic Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. The study will treat approximately 105 evaluable subjects at up to 15 U.S. sites. All subjects will provide informed consent prior to enrollment in the study. Patients who have met the initial screening criteria and who have a visible pleural air leak which requires treatment with a sealant, after standard closure techniques are used (standard sutures, staples or devices supplied by the hospital for thoracoscopic surgery) will be eligible for study participation. If the subject is treated, the surgeon will utilize Progel® PALS to the same sites originally treated with standard technique.

Interventions

DEVICEProgel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant

Video-assisted or robotic-assisted surgical lung procedures plus Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is willing and able to provide written informed consent. * Subject is scheduled for video assisted or robotic assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection (i.e. lobectomy, bilobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection/lung volume reduction), decortications or biopsy within 45 days of the screening evaluation. * Subject is ≥18 years of age. * Subject has a life expectancy ≥6 months. * Following lung resection, subject has at least one or more visible intraoperative air leaks, after standard closure techniques are applied, that requires treatment with pleural sealant. * Subject is willing and able to comply with the study procedures and complete the entire study as specified in the protocol, including the follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has undergone previous lung resection or previous use of a sealant for air leaks. * Subject has a serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dl at baseline or is currently on dialysis. * Following lung resection, subject has intraoperative air leaks that require non-standard, visceral pleural closure (e.g. leak is too small or tissue is too fragile to use sutures/staples). * Subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the use of the study device, or preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements. * Subject has known allergy to human albumin or any component in the Progel® PALS product. * Subject has an active or latent infection which is systemic or at the intended surgery site. * Subject has necrotic or friable borders of the defect that will not support secure suture fixation if use of sutures is required. * Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device trial. * Subject is pregnant or has plans to become pregnant during the study period or is currently breastfeeding. * Subject is part of the site personnel directly involved with this study. * Subject is a family member of the investigational study staff.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Device and/or Procedure-related Adverse EventsOne (1) month follow-upThe primary outcome of the study is the rate of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events at one month after surgery in subjects using Progel® PALS in a VATS/Robotic procedure. Endpoint analysis of the rate of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events will be based on the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication of adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Air Leaks That Are Sealed or ReducedDay 0
Number of Subjects Who Are Free From Air Leaks Immediately Following SurgeryDay 0
Duration of Postoperative Air Leaks From the Time of Surgery Until the Air Leak SealsDay 0-46
Percentage of Subjects Without Postoperative Air Leaks Following Lung Surgery up to One (1) Month Follow-upOne (1) month
Duration of Hospitalization (Length of Stay)Days 0-20
Patient Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 at Change From Baseline at One(1) Month Follow upBaseline and One (1) Month Follow-upThe scale ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 100 (maximum) score. A higher the score represents a more favorable health rating. The SF-36 was completed at baseline before surgery and one month post index procedure; the change calculation for both mental and physical components is based on the difference in scores between these two time points.
Duration of Chest Tube DrainageDay 0-46

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment began in June 2013. 112 subjects were treated across 15 sites.

Pre-assignment details

207 subjects were consented and 112 were treated with Progel® PALS. Of the subjects who were not treated, 69 failed to meet intra-operative inclusion criteria (54/94 screened video-assisted subjects and 15/87 screened robotic assisted subjects) and 11 did not have a video or robotics procedure performed (ie, converted to open thoracotomy)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant
Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant: Video-assisted or robotic-assisted surgical lung procedures plus Progel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant
112
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudySubject could not be contacted1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProgel® Pleural Air Leak Sealant
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
73 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
39 Participants
Age, Continuous67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.21
Region of Enrollment
United States
112 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
28 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Device and/or Procedure-related Adverse Events

The primary outcome of the study is the rate of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events at one month after surgery in subjects using Progel® PALS in a VATS/Robotic procedure. Endpoint analysis of the rate of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events will be based on the Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication of adverse events.

Time frame: One (1) month follow-up

Population: Number of subjects reflects subjects who have completed 1-month follow-up visit or had device/procedure related AE before discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantRate of Device and/or Procedure-related Adverse Events42.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Chest Tube Drainage

Time frame: Day 0-46

Population: MITT Population minus 1 subject with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantDuration of Chest Tube Drainage4.3 DaysStandard Deviation 6.02
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalization (Length of Stay)

Time frame: Days 0-20

Population: MITT Population minus 2 subjects who died prior to discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantDuration of Hospitalization (Length of Stay)4.6 DaysStandard Deviation 3.48
Secondary

Duration of Postoperative Air Leaks From the Time of Surgery Until the Air Leak Seals

Time frame: Day 0-46

Population: MITT population minus 1 subject with missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantDuration of Postoperative Air Leaks From the Time of Surgery Until the Air Leak Seals2.8 DaysStandard Deviation 6.75
Secondary

Number of Subjects Who Are Free From Air Leaks Immediately Following Surgery

Time frame: Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantNumber of Subjects Who Are Free From Air Leaks Immediately Following Surgery55 Participants
Secondary

Patient Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 at Change From Baseline at One(1) Month Follow up

The scale ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 100 (maximum) score. A higher the score represents a more favorable health rating. The SF-36 was completed at baseline before surgery and one month post index procedure; the change calculation for both mental and physical components is based on the difference in scores between these two time points.

Time frame: Baseline and One (1) Month Follow-up

Population: MITT Population minus 19 subjects with missing data at either baseline or 1 month post-procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantPatient Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 at Change From Baseline at One(1) Month Follow upMental Component Score-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantPatient Reported Quality of Life as Measured by the SF-36 at Change From Baseline at One(1) Month Follow upPhysical Component Score-6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
Secondary

Percentage of Air Leaks That Are Sealed or Reduced

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Subjects in the mITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantPercentage of Air Leaks That Are Sealed or Reduced96.2 percentage of air leaks
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Without Postoperative Air Leaks Following Lung Surgery up to One (1) Month Follow-up

Time frame: One (1) month

Population: MITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel® Pleural Air Leak SealantPercentage of Subjects Without Postoperative Air Leaks Following Lung Surgery up to One (1) Month Follow-up49.1 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026