Skip to content

AdVance® vs ARGUS® Sling Procedure in Male With Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence

Randomised Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of AdVance® vs ARGUS® Sling Procedure in Male With Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01866085
Enrollment
128
Registered
2013-05-31
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2013-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

stress urinary incontinence, post prostatectomy

Brief summary

The study is designed to assess efficacy and subject satisfaction of two sling devices: Advance and Argus, in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAdVance® sling procedure
PROCEDUREARGUS Sling procedure

Sponsors

Center Hospitalier de Fleurimont,Sherbrooke University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Jewish General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject is male * The subject is at least 18 years of age * The subject has an estimated life expectancy of more than 5 years * The subject has confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through medical history, urodynamics, and/or physical exam for at least 6 months * The subject has intrinsic sphincter deficiency due to one of the following: post-TURP, simple open prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy completed at least 6 months prior to implantation date * Positive Cough Stress Test (CST): * Positive 24-hours Pad Test (PT): A positive PT is confirmed with leakage of \>8.O g/24h and \< 400 g * The subject has completed urodynamics, uroflow, post-void residual, and cystoscopy as per the protocol within 6 months prior to implant * The subject is able and willing to complete all follow-up visits and procedures indicated in this protocol * The subject has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the local ethics commit-tee of the respective site

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who meet any of the following criteria are excluded from entry into the study * The subject is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or comply with all follow-up requirements according to the study protocol * The subject has an active urogenital infection or active skin infection in region of surgery * The subject has serious bleeding disorders * The subject has incontinence due to neurogenic causes defined as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord/brain injury, CVA, detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, Parkinson's disease, or similar conditions * The subject had a previous implant to treat stress urinary incontinence * The subject has undergone radiation, cryosurgery, or brachy therapy to treat prostate or other pelvic cancer within 6 months * The subject is likely to undergo radiation therapy within the next 6 months * The subject has active urethral or bladder neck stricture disease, requiring continued treatment * The subject has urge predominant incontinence * The subject has an atonic bladder or a postvoid residual (PVR) ≥150mL * The subject has a condition or disorder likely to require future transurethral procedure * The subject is enrolled in a concurrent clinical trial of any treatment (drug or device) that could affect continence function without the sponsors'approval * Subjects who in the opinion of the investigator are unable and/or unlikely to to comprehend the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study and to follow the study procedures and instructions and complete all study related measurements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and assess change in 24-hour pad weight .12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess change in subject satisfaction using questionnaires: ICIQ, UCLA-RAND Incontinence Index.12 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
Summarize all cumulative device and procedure related adverse events12 months

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJacques Corcos, MD
jcorcos@jgh.mcgill.ca1-514-340-8222
Backup ContactOleg Loutochin
oloutochin@jgh.mcgill.ca1-514-340-8222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026