Skip to content

Comparison Between Palpatory and Preprocedural Ultrasound Guided Techniques on Performance of Spinal Anesthesia

Comparison Between Palpatory and Preprocedural Ultrasound Guided Techniques on Performance of Spinal Anesthesia in Term Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarian Section- A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01865955
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-05-31
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2014-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

Ultrasound, Spinal anesthesia, Cesarean section

Brief summary

Pre-procedural ultrasound for Spinal & Epidural anesthesia is now being increasingly performed worldwide. Pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine has been shown to facilitate the placement of epidural anesthesia in pregnant women, diagnostic lumbar punctures, performance of spinal anesthesia in non-obstetric patients and accurate identification of the interspace at which the puncture is being performed. This is especially important during spinal anesthesia, where puncture below the ending of the spinal cord is recommended for safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of spinal anesthesia between the pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine and the traditional palpatory technique, in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Furthermore, we aim to describe sonoanatomic features of the spine that could predict the ease of insertion of spinal anesthesia in that patient population. We hypothesize that in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery, pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine will improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia at first attempt, compared to the traditional palpatory technique.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound

Ultrasound applied to the lumbar region to determine spinal needle placement.

DEVICEThe spinal needle

Sponsors

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients scheduled to receive spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sections * ASA physical status 1 - 3 * Written informed consent * Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient's refusal. * Body mass index ≥ 45 * Patient with marked spinal bony deformity (Severe scoliosis on visual inspection and previous spinal instrumentation).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spinal needle redirections15 minutesNumber of redirections needed to perform a successful spinal puncture (presence of cerebrospinal fluid). A needle redirection is defined as any change in needle insertion trajectory that did not involve complete withdrawal of the needle from the patient's skin. The first needle pass will not be considered a redirection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need to change to another interspace.15 minutesRelocating the spinal needle to another interspace.
Procedure time15 minutesTime taken to perform the spinal anesthesia, measured from insertion of the introducer needle to visualization of spinal fluid.
Needle reinsertions15 minutesNumber of needle reinsertions defined as complete withdrawal of the spinal needle to the patient's skin followed by a new attempt in the same interspace.
Intervertebral level agreement3 hoursIntervertebral level agreement between L3-L4 obtained in the postoperative ultrasound assessment and the marked intervertebral level obtained pre-procedure, either by ultrasound or palpation.
Ultrasound Grading3 hoursUltrasound Grading: The image pattern of the intervertebral space will be categorized into three grades by three study investigators not involved in providing the spinal anesthesia: Typical Image,Atypical Image or Inconclusive Image.
Pain score15 minutesVerbal Numerical Pain Scores during the procedure (0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 mean the worst pain imaginable).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026