Skip to content

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cortical Plasticity in Patients With Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01865578
Enrollment
40
Registered
2013-05-31
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Brief summary

Patients suffering from anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis show impaired NMDA-receptor dependent neuronal transmission. Furthermore, they often have cognitive deficits of different magnitude. Impaired neuronal signaling of NMDA-receptors very likely result in decreased cortical synaptic plasticity. Thus, this represents one major reason of cognitive deficits. Synaptic plasticity can be assessed in humans via the non-invasive technique of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The current study aims to investigate whether learning ability and also cortical plasticity can be changed by applying sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Therefore, we are recruiting 10 to 15 patients suffering from anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis as well as healthy controls in order to compare tDCS effects. Learning ability is assessed by motor sequence tasks, whereas cortical plasticity is measured via TMS. tDCS is a novel non-invasive technique allowing induction of changes in cerebral excitability level and also cortical plasticity. Previous studies showed positive outcome of anodal stimulation on learning tasks. Especially motor learning seems to be an important target for tDCS treatment since it showed best results for both post-stroke patients and healthy subjects. Multiple sessions of tDCS are inducing long-term effects and improved learning function, which were present three months after stimulation. In this study we hope to reveals new insights into the pathomechanisms of impaired cognitive and learning abilities in patients having anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Moreover, we evaluate whether tDCS is an effective treatment for patients with cognitive and learning deficits.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

Transcranial direct current stimulation involves the application of weak electric currents to the brain.

DEVICESham Stimulation

no electrical stimulation

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis * healthy (control) subjects

Exclusion criteria

* Any metal inside the body/head, e.g. clips, pace maker, medical pumps, cochlear implant etc. * Traumatic brain injury * Stroke * Cerebral tumor * Pregnancy * untreated severe internal or psychiatric diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
neurophysiological measurements using TMS1 weekTMS protocoll (a paired associative stimulation) is applied after tDCS or sham stimulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
performance in a motor task1 weekperformance in a motor task is compared after a tDCS or sham stimulation

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026