Skip to content

Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in the Gravid Obese Woman

Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in the Gravid Obese Woman

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01864564
Acronym
EGGO
Enrollment
962
Registered
2013-05-29
Start date
2013-06-18
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2020-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes, Obesity

Keywords

Gestational diabetes, Screening, Obesity, Anhydroglucitol

Brief summary

Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes. Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing. Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of hyperglycemia, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.

Detailed description

Over 1/3 of reproductive age women are obese. Obese women have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, fetal growth disorders, diabetes, hypertensive diseases and maternal death. Although weight loss prior to pregnancy is the ideal, a significant proportion of obese women do not present to care until after conception. Consequently, developing a comprehensive plan for managing the obese gravida is imperative. One component of such a plan must include screening and treating for gestational diabetes (GDM), which is associated with macrosomia, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Obesity substantially increases the risk of GDM (odds ratio 2-5). GDM treatment has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes,but obese women with GDM continue to have worsened outcomes compared to normal weight women with GDM, with more cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, macrosomia and stillbirths occurring in obese women. This is perhaps due to pre-existing insulin resistance in obese women that, when coupled with the normal insulin resistance of pregnancy, leads to earlier onset of GDM in obese women compared to normal weight women, with consequently longer fetal exposure to hyperglycemic episodes prior to diagnosis and treatment. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends screening obese women for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the first trimester or upon presentation. However, due to lack of supporting data, this recommendation is not widely followed and the majority of obese women do not undergo GDM screening until 24-28 weeks gestation. Postponing testing may delay the diagnosis and treatment of GDM by 10 weeks or more, resulting in fetal hyperglycemia during critical periods of fetal growth and development. Early screening, between 14-18 weeks gestation, in this high-risk population will allow for earlier recognition and treatment of GDM, thereby improving perinatal outcomes. Additionally, little is known about screening and diagnostic standards for GDM early in pregnancy. Currently, when GDM testing is performed early in pregnancy, the criteria used to diagnose GDM at 24-28 weeks are applied. However, these thresholds were developed for a test performed at 24-28 weeks; applying these same thresholds at 14-18 weeks may not be appropriate. As insulin resistance increases throughout pregnancy, lowering the criteria for glucose tolerance testing earlier in gestation may improve GDM detection and avoid the need for re-testing later in pregnancy. Alternatively, as GDM is the new-onset of insulin resistance with resulting hyperglycemia, biomarkers that reflect metabolic markers of recent hyperglycemic episodes may perform well in screening for GDM and may decrease the patient burden of, while increasing compliance with, glucose tolerance testing. One such marker that has been evaluated in Type 2 diabetes is 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG), an unmetabolized monosaccharide. AG has a fairly stable steady-state concentration in the blood that is unaffected by fasting, dietary changes and pregnancy; it is reabsorbed in the renal tubules by the same transporter that reabsorbs glucose. During a hyperglycemic episode, the presence of glucose in the urine competitively inhibits the reabsorption of AG, resulting in a precipitous decline in AG levels. AG levels recover slowly in the presence of continued hyperglycemia. The rapid fall of AG with the onset of hyperglycemia and its slow recovery in situations of on-going hyperglycemia suggest it as both a sensitive and specific marker for new-onset glucose intolerance requiring treatment. As perinatal outcomes are closely linked to hyperglycemic excursions, (18) AG may be the most sensitive and specific marker for determining the GDM patient who will benefit most from treatment. This study is potentially practice changing and could greatly reduce the disparities in perinatal outcomes seen in obese women. Early GDM screening of obese women may reduce the risk of cesarean delivery, macrosomia, stillbirth, preterm birth, and preeclampsia in this population. This study has 3 specific aims: Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved composite perinatal outcomes. Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing. Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of recent hyperglycemic excursions, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.

Interventions

OTHEREarly Screen

Women will be randomized to be screened for gestational diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks gestation (early=intervention) versus routine screening at 24-28 weeks.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Ochsner Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant * 18 years and older * Body mass index \>=30.0 * \<20 weeks gestation at presentation for care

Exclusion criteria

* Prior cesarean * History of bariatric surgery * Major maternal medical illness (cardiac disease, HIV, hemoglobinopathy, oxygen requirement) * Chronic prednisone use * Known fetal anomalies * Multifetal gestation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal OutcomeBaseline to within 6 weeks of deliveryAny one of the following: Macrosomia (birth weight \> 4000 g), primary cesarean, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia (\<40 mg/dL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Cesarean DeliveryDeliveryPrimary cesarean : delivery via cesarean, first cesarean (does not include repeat cesarean deliveries)
Pregnancy Induced HypertensionWithin 6 weeks of deliveryIncludes gestational hypertension and preeclampsia
Shoulder DystociaAt birthShoulder dystocia as identified by delivering physician
Neonatal HyperbilirubinemiaWithin 6 weeks of deliveryserum bilirubin level above the 95th percentile for gestational age
Number of Participants With MacrosomiaWithin 6 weeks of deliveryNumber of infants with Birth weight \>4000 g
Gestational Age at Deliveryat deliveryGestational age in weeks as calculated by ACOG criteria
Any Diabetic Medicationbaseline to deliveryincludes the use of any diabetic medication
Insulin Medicationbaseline to deliveryIncludes the use of Insulin
Large for Gestational Ageat deliverydefined as \>= the 90th percentile by Duryea et al
Neonatal HypoglycemiaWithin 6 weeks of deliveryBlood sugar level \<40 mg/dL

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Routine Screening
Obese women will be screened at 24-28 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation.
463
Early Screening
Obese women will be randomized to be screened at 14-19.9 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. Women who do not have diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks will be re-screened at 24-28 weeks per the standard of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation. Early Screen: Women will be randomized to be screened for gestational diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks gestation (early=intervention) versus routine screening at 24-28 weeks.
459
Total922

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1723
Overall Studynot reported034
Overall StudyProtocol Violation027
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRoutine ScreeningEarly Screening
Age, Continuous27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
26.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Any alcohol use137 Participants61 Participants76 Participants
Any drug use90 Participants49 Participants41 Participants
Any Smoking181 Participants98 Participants83 Participants
Asthma114 Participants53 Participants61 Participants
Body Mass index at randomization37 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
37.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
37.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Depression105 Participants50 Participants55 Participants
Gestational age at Randomization13.7 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
13.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
13.8 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Hemoglobin A1c at 14-20 weeks5.3 % A1c5.3 % A1c5.3 % A1c
High School education or greater614 Participants305 Participants309 Participants
Hypertension111 Participants50 Participants61 Participants
Married194 Participants96 Participants98 Participants
Medicaid/no insurance875 Participants441 Participants434 Participants
Parous667 Participants338 Participants329 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, Non-Hispanic
579 Participants299 Participants280 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
245 Participants123 Participants122 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, Non-Hispanic
87 Participants35 Participants52 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
922 participants463 participants459 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
female
922 Participants463 Participants459 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
10 / 46322 / 459
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 4630 / 459
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 46322 / 459

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome

Any one of the following: Macrosomia (birth weight \> 4000 g), primary cesarean, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia (\<40 mg/dL)

Time frame: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningNumber of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome235 Participants
Early ScreeningNumber of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome261 Participants
Secondary

Any Diabetic Medication

includes the use of any diabetic medication

Time frame: baseline to delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningAny Diabetic Medication20 Participants
Early ScreeningAny Diabetic Medication31 Participants
Secondary

Gestational Age at Delivery

Gestational age in weeks as calculated by ACOG criteria

Time frame: at delivery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Routine ScreeningGestational Age at Delivery38.5 weeksStandard Deviation 3.4
Early ScreeningGestational Age at Delivery38.2 weeksStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Insulin Medication

Includes the use of Insulin

Time frame: baseline to delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningInsulin Medication3 Participants
Early ScreeningInsulin Medication11 Participants
Secondary

Large for Gestational Age

defined as \>= the 90th percentile by Duryea et al

Time frame: at delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningLarge for Gestational Age26 Participants
Early ScreeningLarge for Gestational Age27 Participants
Secondary

Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

serum bilirubin level above the 95th percentile for gestational age

Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningNeonatal Hyperbilirubinemia72 Participants
Early ScreeningNeonatal Hyperbilirubinemia90 Participants
Secondary

Neonatal Hypoglycemia

Blood sugar level \<40 mg/dL

Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningNeonatal Hypoglycemia19 Participants
Early ScreeningNeonatal Hypoglycemia22 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Macrosomia

Number of infants with Birth weight \>4000 g

Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningNumber of Participants With Macrosomia21 Participants
Early ScreeningNumber of Participants With Macrosomia25 Participants
Secondary

Pregnancy Induced Hypertension

Includes gestational hypertension and preeclampsia

Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningPregnancy Induced Hypertension102 Participants
Early ScreeningPregnancy Induced Hypertension136 Participants
Secondary

Primary Cesarean Delivery

Primary cesarean : delivery via cesarean, first cesarean (does not include repeat cesarean deliveries)

Time frame: Delivery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningPrimary Cesarean Delivery93 Participants
Early ScreeningPrimary Cesarean Delivery79 Participants
Secondary

Shoulder Dystocia

Shoulder dystocia as identified by delivering physician

Time frame: At birth

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine ScreeningShoulder Dystocia32 Participants
Early ScreeningShoulder Dystocia30 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026