Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Systane® ULTRA Compared to OPTIVE® in Ocular Surface Staining

Clinical Evaluation of Systane® ULTRA Compared to OPTIVE® in Ocular Surface Staining

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01863368
Enrollment
105
Registered
2013-05-27
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndrome

Keywords

Dry eye syndrome, Systane Ultra, Optive, Ocular Surface Staining, OSDI, Eye drops

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Systane® ULTRA lubricant eye drops to OPTIVE® lubricating eye drops for ocular surface staining within dry eye subjects and to evaluate the safety of Systane® ULTRA after 3 months of use.

Detailed description

Following a 2-week washout phase with saline eye drops, subjects were randomized to receive either Systane® ULTRA or OPTIVE® for the remainder of the study.

Interventions

OTHERPreservative-free saline solution eyedrops

1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day, for up to two weeks as washout prior to Phase I and Phase II.

OTHERSystane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops
OTHEROPTIVE® lubricating eyedrops

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to attend all study visits. * Diagnosis of dry eye, as specified in protocol. * Uses artificial tears, as specified in protocol. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Poor visual acuity, as specified in protocol. * Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating, or not using adequate birth control, as specified in protocol. * Any hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products or ingredients. * Any eye disorder, ocular surgery, medication, medical condition, or systemic disease, as specified in protocol. * Contact lens use within 2 weeks of Screening Visit. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)Baseline, Day 35The TOSS score is a composite score of corneal fluorescein staining, nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining, and temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining, each scored on a 0-5 Likert scale (0=absent, 5=severe). TOSS scores can range from 0 to 15. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)Day 35The OSDI is a 12-item, quality of life questionnaire that evaluates symptoms based on 3 modules (type of discomfort, environmental triggers, and tasking) on a 0-4 Likert scale (0=None of the time, 4=All of the time). A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, where 0=No disability and 100=Complete disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)Day 35The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment effectiveness scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time, 1=A little of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=Most of the time, and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment effectiveness was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)Day 35The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment inconvenience scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time, 1=Most of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=A little of the time, and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment inconvenience was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 13 study centers located in France and 3 study centers located in Germany.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 105 enrolled, 11 subjects were exited prior to randomization: 9 screen failures, 1 adverse event, and 1 lost to follow-up. This reporting group includes all randomized subjects (94).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Systane Ultra
Lubricant eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).
46
Optive
Lubricating eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).
48
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35Adverse Event24
Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35Lost to Follow-up10
Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35Withdrawal by Subject02
Phase I, Day 0 to Day 35Withdrawal by subject prior to treatment01
Phase II, Day 35 to Day 90Adverse Event10
Phase II, Day 35 to Day 90Lost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSystane UltraOptiveTotal
Age, Continuous63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Mean Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants40 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1052 / 463 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1051 / 460 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The TOSS score is a composite score of corneal fluorescein staining, nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining, and temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining, each scored on a 0-5 Likert scale (0=absent, 5=severe). TOSS scores can range from 0 to 15. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 35

Population: This analysis group includes all randomized subjects with data at visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane UltraMean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
OptiveMean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment effectiveness scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time, 1=A little of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=Most of the time, and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment effectiveness was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: This analysis group includes all subjects with data at visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane UltraMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)62.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
OptiveMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)55.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Secondary

Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction. The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment inconvenience scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time, 1=Most of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=A little of the time, and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL score for treatment inconvenience was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: This analysis group includes all subjects with data at visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane UltraMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)69.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
OptiveMean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)67.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)

The OSDI is a 12-item, quality of life questionnaire that evaluates symptoms based on 3 modules (type of discomfort, environmental triggers, and tasking) on a 0-4 Likert scale (0=None of the time, 4=All of the time). A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, where 0=No disability and 100=Complete disability. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 35

Population: This analysis group includes all subjects with data at visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane UltraMean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)31.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
OptiveMean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)35.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026