Skip to content

Randomised Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration

Single Blind, Prospective, Randomised Comparative Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01862679
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-05-24
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2016-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease

Brief summary

The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine. During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD. It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions: 1. Does HDF make patients feel better? 2. Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD? 3. Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD? The investigators will do this by randomly assigning patients on HF-HD to receive 2 months of either HF-HD or HDF with as equivalent treatment prescriptions as possible and without the patient knowing which treatment they are receiving. After two months the patients will switch to the alternative form of dialysis for a further two months. During the study the investigators will ask the patients how long it took them to recover from the preceding session of dialysis, assess the frequency of symptomatic low blood pressure and also perform blood tests at set intervals to measure specific blood parameters.

Interventions

OTHERHigh-flux haemodialysis

High-flux haemodialysis is the standard dialysis modality currently in use in the UK

During Haemodiafiltration, the dialysis machine removes more water from the blood than during normal hemodialysis. The additional liquid is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. Thus, the machine exchanges a high volume of fluid during treatment and removes the liquid together with toxins from the blood.

Sponsors

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Receiving HF-HD for at least 3 months * Reliable vascular access (i.e. use of the same fistula, graft or tunnelled central venous catheter for at least 1 month) * Aged 18 or older

Exclusion criteria

* Currently receiving HDF * Emergency hospital admissions within the preceding 4 weeks * Life expectancy less than 6 months * Neoplasia * Unable to give informed consent * Unable to perform QoL questionnaire or self report recovery post-dialysis time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the average time taken to fully recover post dialysisBaseline compared 8 week treatment pointSelf-assessment by patient of hours/mins to full recovery after dialysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of dialysis circuit clotting eventsNumber of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of potassiumMeasured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of phosphateMeasured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of vitamin B12.Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Number of symptomatic hypotension eventsNumber of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of beta-2-microglobulinMeasured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of betaineMeasured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of interleukin-6Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Kt/V urea.: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of PTH.Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026