Skip to content

Low-dose VS High-dose IV Cyclophosphamide for Proliferative LN in Children

Efficacy and Infectious Complications of Induction Therapy With Low-dose Versus High-dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in Children

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01861561
Acronym
Low/highIVCY
Enrollment
43
Registered
2013-05-23
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection, Renal Insufficiency

Brief summary

Proliferative lupus nephritis (LN)is the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality in juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Induction therapy with high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide can improve renal outcomes, but considerably associated with infection. Although severe infection is the significant complication related to poorer prognosis for juvenile SLE patients in Asia, cyclophosphamide is still commonly used as the drug of choice for severe lupus nephritis. Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial demonstrated low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide regimen followed by azathioprine achieved good clinical results comparable with obtained high-dose regimen. There was lower number of severe infection episodes, but no significant difference. Recent studies applied low dose of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2/dose or 500 mg/dose)in young patients and showed good renal response. Low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide regimen might promote non-inferior renal remission whereas decrease risk of serious infection and improve overall patient outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGLow-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide

Intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/dose every 4 weeks/months, total 7 doses

DRUGHigh-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide

Intravenous cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks/months, total in 7 doses: the 1st dose-500 mg/m2/dose,the 2nd dose-750 mg/m2/dose, the 3rd-7th doses- 1,000 mg/m2/dose with the maximum dose at 1,500 mg/dose

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Child up to 15 years of age who fulfilled the 1997 updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of SLE and his or her renal biopsy reveals lupus nephritis class III or IV regarding to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society revision on the classification of the lupus nephritis.

Exclusion criteria

* patient who has prior renal insufficiency due to chronic kidney disease other than lupus nephritis * patient who has the history of cyclophosphamide hypersensitivity * patient who has prior cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil administration within 6 months * patient who is pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
renal responseat 6 months of the treatment3 main renal parameters: renal function(eCCl),proteinuria(spot urine protein/creatinine ratio, UPCR), and urine sediment (rbc,wbc,and casts) 'renal remission' * complete- normal renal function, UPCR\<0.2, and normal urine sediment(rbc\<5,wbc\<5/HPF,and no cast) * partial- at least 50%improvement in 2 main parameters with UPCR \<= 1.0 and without worsening of remaining main parameter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
infectionwithin 6 monthsinfectious episode classified in 3 levels * mild infection - the infection that is not serious and the patient could be treated with oral antimicrobial agent in outpatient clinic * moderate infection - the infection that the patient need admission or intravenous antimicrobial agent * serious infection - the infection that the patient is critically ill and need ICU care

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient well beingat 0,1,3 and 6 months of the treatmentusing visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10)for self assessment their well being
SLE disease activity index scoreat 0,1,3 and 6 months of the treatment

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026