Skip to content

Tadalafil and Lenalidomide Maintenance With or Without Activated Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes (MILs) in High Risk Myeloma

Randomized Phase II Study of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation With Tadalafil and Lenalidomide Maintenance With or Without Activated Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes (MILs) in High Risk Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01858558
Enrollment
102
Registered
2013-05-21
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2019-06-19
Last updated
2020-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

This research is being done to find out if altering the immune system by giving activated marrow infiltrating lymphocytes (MILs) can improve outcomes for multiple myeloma patients who receive a standard autologous stem cell transplant.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALaMIL

On day 0, patients will receive auto transplant followed by Tadalafil and aMIL. At day 60, patients will receive Lenalidomide.

DRUGNo aMIL

On day 0, patients will receive auto transplant followed by Tadalafil. At day 60, patients will receive Lenalidomide.

Sponsors

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 - 80 years old; * Patients with active myeloma requiring systemic treatment; * Newly diagnosed patients. Relapsed myeloma patients that have not previously had a transplant; * Meeting criteria for high-risk disease; * Measurable serum and/or urine M-protein from prior to induction therapy documented and available. A positive serum free lite assay is acceptable; * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2 (see Appendix C). * Meet all institutional requirements for autologous stem cell transplantation; * The patient must be able to comprehend and have signed the informed consent; * Patients must have had \> than PR after last therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of any of the following cancers: * POEMS syndrome (plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein \[M-protein\] and skin changes); * Non-secretory myeloma (no measurable protein on Serum Free Lite Assay); * Plasma cell leukemia; * Diagnosis of amyloidosis; * Failed to achieve at least a partial response (PR) to latest therapy; * Previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;Patients can have had prior relapsed disease as long as they have never been previously transplanted; * Known history of HIV infection; * Use of corticosteroids (glucocorticoids) within 21 days of bone marrow collection; * Use of any myeloma-specific therapy within 21 days of bone marrow collection; * Infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral agents within seven days of registration; * Participation in any clinical trial within 28 days of registration on this trial, which involved an investigational drug or device; * History of malignancy other than multiple myeloma within five years of registration, except adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer; * Active autoimmune disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosis) requiring active systemic treatment. Hypothyroidism without evidence of Grave's disease or Hashimoto's thyroiditis is permitted. * Human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) 1 or 2 positive; * Known hypersensitivity to Prevnar or any of its components; * Contraindication to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (e.g. currently on nitrates).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs Product120 daysFeasibility is defined as the ability to harvest, expand, and infuse the MILs product within 120 days. After treating 60 patients with MILs, we will declare MILs not feasible if we can only harvest, expand, and deliver MILs to 40 or fewer patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toxicity as Determined by Total Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events60 days from aMILs harvest until day 60 after transplantTotal number of adverse events grade 3 or higher that occur from MILs harvest through 60 days after transplant.
Overall Survival (OS)3 yearsOS assessed by number of participants alive at the end of follow up period.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)5 yearsMedian PFS time equals the time of randomization (in months) until disease progression, death from any cause, or protocol deviation due to lenalidomide dosing (above 10mg), whichever occurs first.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at four sites: Johns Hopkins University, Moffitt Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville) and the Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia (Northside).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 102 patients randomized, one was randomized to the control group who was lost to follow-up prior to start; did not have aMILs harvested, and was not transplanted. This patient is therefore not included in this report.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
aMIL Arm
Patients receive activated Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes (aMIL) aMIL: On day 0, patients will receive auto transplant followed by Tadalafil and aMIL. At day 60, patients will receive Lenalidomide.
70
No aMIL
Patients do not receive activated Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes (aMIL) No aMIL: On day 0, patients will receive auto transplant followed by Tadalafil. At day 60, patients will receive Lenalidomide.
31
Total101

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyDisease progression31
Overall StudyFailed expansion of cell product20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProduct contamination20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicaMIL ArmNo aMILTotal
70-gene expression Prognostic Risk Score (GEP-70)
High Risk
12 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
70-gene expression Prognostic Risk Score (GEP-70)
Not High Risk
58 Participants27 Participants85 Participants
Age, Continuous62.5 years59.0 years61.7 years
Disease Status
Newly Diagnosed
60 Participants26 Participants86 Participants
Disease Status
Relapsed
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0
27 Participants7 Participants34 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 or 2
34 Participants21 Participants55 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) Multiple Myeloma Classification
missing
14 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) Multiple Myeloma Classification
Stage I
20 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) Multiple Myeloma Classification
Stage II
19 Participants7 Participants26 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) Multiple Myeloma Classification
Stage III
17 Participants8 Participants25 Participants
Myeloma Prognostic Risk Signature (MYPRS) Risk Category
High Risk
12 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Myeloma Prognostic Risk Signature (MYPRS) Risk Category
Indeterminate
25 Participants10 Participants35 Participants
Myeloma Prognostic Risk Signature (MYPRS) Risk Category
Low Risk
25 Participants15 Participants40 Participants
Myeloma Prognostic Risk Signature (MYPRS) Risk Category
N/A
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Number of Prior Multiple Myeloma Treatments1 prior treatments2 prior treatments1 prior treatments
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
53 Participants21 Participants74 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
70 participants31 participants101 participants
Salmon Stage multiple myeloma classification
IA-IB
9 Participants0 Participants9 Participants
Salmon Stage multiple myeloma classification
IIA-IIB
14 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Salmon Stage multiple myeloma classification
IIIA-IIIB
35 Participants21 Participants56 Participants
Salmon Stage multiple myeloma classification
missing
12 Participants3 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants15 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants16 Participants50 Participants
Time to Diagnosis0.53 years0.76 years0.55 years
Time to stem cell transplant (SCT)63.0 Days56.0 Days60.0 Days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 701 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 700 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
64 / 7029 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs Product

Feasibility is defined as the ability to harvest, expand, and infuse the MILs product within 120 days. After treating 60 patients with MILs, we will declare MILs not feasible if we can only harvest, expand, and deliver MILs to 40 or fewer patients.

Time frame: 120 days

Population: 71 patients were evaluable in the feasibility set: 70 randomized to the aMILs Arm, plus one patient who was not randomized due to harvest failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductTotal number who received aMILS71 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductFeasible46 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- failed harvest1 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- disease progression4 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- death1 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- lost to follow-up1 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- failed expansion2 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- cell product contamination2 Participants
aMIL ArmFeasibility of MILs as Assessed by the Ability to Harvest, Expand, and Infuse the MILs ProductReason not feasible- greater than 120 days14 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS assessed by number of participants alive at the end of follow up period.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: This is an analysis by intention-to-treat and only considers transplanted patients randomized to the aMILs arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
aMIL ArmOverall Survival (OS)55 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Median PFS time equals the time of randomization (in months) until disease progression, death from any cause, or protocol deviation due to lenalidomide dosing (above 10mg), whichever occurs first.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: This is an analysis by intention-to-treat and only considers transplanted patients randomized to the aMILs arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
aMIL ArmProgression-free Survival (PFS)21.82 months
Secondary

Toxicity as Determined by Total Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Total number of adverse events grade 3 or higher that occur from MILs harvest through 60 days after transplant.

Time frame: 60 days from aMILs harvest until day 60 after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
aMIL ArmToxicity as Determined by Total Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events129 adverse events
No aMILToxicity as Determined by Total Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events65 adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026