Skip to content

A Comparative Efficacy Study: Treatment for Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers

An Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Approaches for Treatment of Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers Resistant to Standard of Care: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01858545
Enrollment
56
Registered
2013-05-21
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of MatriStem devices compared to cellular dermal replacement tissue, for the treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Detailed description

Due to their characteristically poor healing capacity, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are challenging for clinicians to treat. This prospective, multi-center clinical study will examine outcomes following treatment of DFUs, with one of two FDA cleared tissue-engineered devices, MatriStem® or cellular dermal replacement tissue, on DFUs that have demonstrated an inadequate response to initial standard of care therapy. The incidence of ulcer closure, rate of wound closure, and quality of life will be evaluated over a eight week period.

Interventions

DEVICEMatriStem

MatriStem MicroMatrix and MatriStem Wound Matrix

DEVICECellular Dermal Replacement Tissue

Cellular Dermal Replacement Tissue

Sponsors

Integra LifeSciences Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria: * Subject has a current diagnosis of type I or type II diabetes * Subject's ulcer is on the forefoot or heel * Subject has chronic ulcer - has been present for minimum of 4 weeks * Subject's ulcer extends through the dermis and into the subcutaneous tissue * Subject's HgbA1c \<12% * Subject has adequate circulation to the study foot as evidenced by a Doppler measured ABI greater than or equal to 0.7after 10 minutes rest Major

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a known sensitivity to bovine- or porcine-derived products. * Subject's ulcer is due to a non-diabetic etiology * Subject's ulcer is over a Charcot deformity of the mid-foot * Subject's random blood sugar readings are \>450 mg/dL * Subject is on dialysis * Subject has a non-study ulcer on the study limb located within 7.0 cm of the study ulcer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Complete Wound Closure8 WeeksNumber of participants with incidence of complete wound closure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
MatriStem MicroMatrix and MatriStem Wound Matrix MatriStem: MatriStem MicroMatrix and MatriStem Wound Matrix
27
Comparator
Cellular Dermal Replacement Tissue Cellular Dermal Replacement Tissue: Cellular Dermal Replacement Tissue
29
Total56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentalComparatorTotal
Age, Continuous57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
58.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
57.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 272 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 272 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Complete Wound Closure

Number of participants with incidence of complete wound closure

Time frame: 8 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ExperimentalNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure5 Participants
ComparatorNumber of Participants With Complete Wound Closure2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026