Skip to content

Hip Replacement in a High Volume Community Hospital: Effect on Length of Stay and Hospital Cost

Introduction of the Direct Anterior Approach to Hip Replacement Into a High Volume Community Hospital: Effect on Length of Stay and Hospital Cost

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01857505
Enrollment
0
Registered
2013-05-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Total Hip replacement, Fracture table, DePuySynthes, Direct anterior approach hip replacement, Posterior approach hip replacement

Brief summary

The investigators propose to evaluate and compare the percentage of patients who are able to be discharged in less than 3 days after undergoing total hip arthroscopy through either a direct anterior or posterior approach, utilizing the identical post operative protocol. The investigators also propose to evaluate the costs associated with the two different approaches to hip replacement in the same group of patients. Post operative resource utilization, discharge disposition, and pain medicine requirement will also be evaluated.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that a higher proportion of patients treated with the direct anterior approach for hip replacement will be able to leave the hospital in less than 3 days when compared with a less invasive posterior approach. Secondly, decreased length of stay associated with the procedure may reduce hospital costs.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

DePuy Orthopaedics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Anne Arundel Health System Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Consecutive single surgeon series of patients who have undergone primary uncemented hip replacement at our institution through either a posterior approach or direct anterior approach on a fracture table. Posterior approach patient - most recent patient prior to March, 2010, compared with consecutive recent anterior approach patients with minimum of 6 month follow-up. 2. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or avascular necrosis. 3. No previous surgery on affected hip. 4. Age 40-90 at time of surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient not permitted to bear full weight after the procedure, per post operative instructions 2. Hip replacement performed for acute fracture. 3. Previous hip surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Hospital StayRetrospective review of hospital discharge recordsThe length of stay and proportion of patients who went home in less than 3 days will be determined for each group. To evaluate and compare the percentage of patients who are able to be discharged in less than 3 days after undergoing total hip arthroscopy through either a direct anterior or posterior approach, utilizing the identical post operative protocol.
Hospital costRetrospective review of utilization recordsHospital cost analysis will be undertaken for each group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Operative Pain Medication UtilizationAfter retrospective chart review is complete -- approximately 6 monthsAnalysis of post operative pain medicine requirement will be compared for the two groups.
Utilization of inpatient physical therapy resourcesRetrospective review -- of hospital dischargeUtilization of inpatient physical therapy resources and post hospital discharge disposition will be compared for the two groups.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026