Skip to content

An Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01854047
Enrollment
776
Registered
2013-05-15
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of different doses and regimens of dupilumab in participants with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma. Secondary Objective: To evaluate different doses and regimens of dupilumab in participants with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma, with regard to: * Safety and tolerability * Dupilumab systemic exposure and anti-drug antibodies

Detailed description

Total duration per participant of approximately 43 weeks including a screening period (14-21 days), a randomized treatment period (24 weeks), and a post-treatment period (16 weeks).

Interventions

DRUGDupilumab

Solution for injection, Subcutaneous injection

DRUGplacebo

Solution for injection, Subcutaneous injection

DRUGICS/LABA therapy

Oral inhalation, Prior therapy with Mometasone furoate /formoterol, budesonide / formoterol, or fluticasone propionate / salmeterol continued at stable dose

Oral inhalation as needed

DRUGLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol

Oral inhalation as needed

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants with a physician diagnosis of moderate to severe, uncontrolled asthma for \>=12 months, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2009 Guidelines and: * Existing treatment with moderate or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid / long-acting beta-2 agonist * Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) 40 to 80% of predicted normal * Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5-question version (ACQ-5) score \>=1.5 * Reversibility of at least 12% and 200 mL in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) * Had experienced, within prior year: hospitalization, emergency or urgent care visit or systemic corticosteroid treatment for worsening asthma

Exclusion criteria

* Participants \<18 years * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other lung diseases (eg, emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) which impaired pulmonary function tests * Chest X-ray within 12 months of screening visit or at screening visit with clinically significant findings of lung disease(s) other than asthma * Current smoker or cessation of smoking within 6 months prior to Visit 1 * Previous smoker with a smoking history \>10 pack-years The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Absolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.
Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.
Annualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Annualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.
Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.
Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.
Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.
Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.
Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.
Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.
Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.
Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.
Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 201 sites in 16 countries. A total of 1532 participants were screened between June 2013 and June 2014, of which, 776 participants were randomized at 174 sites in 15 countries. 756 participants were screen failures mainly due to exclusion criteria met and inclusion criteria not met.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified using blood eosinophils count (eosinophils \>=0.3 Giga/L \[G/L\]; eosinophils 0.2 to 0.299 G/L; eosinophils\<0.2 G/L) and country. Assignment was done by Interactive Voice/Web Response System (1:1:1:1:1) for Placebo and Dupilumab (300 mg every 2 weeks \[q2w\]; 200 mg q2w; 300 mg every 4 week \[q4w\] and 200 mg q4w).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
158
Dupilumab 300 mg q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
157
Dupilumab 200 mg q2w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
150
Dupilumab 300 mg q4w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
157
Dupilumab 200 mg q4w
2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
154
Total776

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event546107
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10000
Overall StudyOther than specified above33358
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol30200
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated01204

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDupilumab 300 mg q2wDupilumab 200 mg q2wPlacebo q2wDupilumab 300 mg q4wDupilumab 200 mg q4wTotal
Age, Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Number of Participants According to Blood Eosinophil Count
<0.3 G/L
93 Participants85 Participants90 Participants91 Participants92 Participants451 Participants
Number of Participants According to Blood Eosinophil Count
>=0.3 G/L
64 Participants65 Participants68 Participants66 Participants62 Participants325 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic Or Latino
29 Participants29 Participants31 Participants33 Participants26 Participants148 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic Or Latino
128 Participants121 Participants127 Participants124 Participants128 Participants628 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
22 Participants25 Participants25 Participants23 Participants20 Participants115 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants9 Participants9 Participants12 Participants7 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
129 Participants114 Participants119 Participants120 Participants125 Participants607 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants96 Participants104 Participants100 Participants87 Participants490 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants54 Participants54 Participants57 Participants67 Participants286 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1580 / 1560 / 1482 / 1570 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 15895 / 15681 / 14896 / 15774 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 15813 / 15610 / 14816 / 1576 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.01 literStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.13 literStandard Deviation 0.37
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.82 literStandard Deviation 0.55
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.26 literStandard Deviation 0.39
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.12 literStandard Deviation 0.59
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.85 literStandard Deviation 0.53
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.79 literStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.32 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.12 literStandard Deviation 0.68
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.86 literStandard Deviation 0.57
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.24 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.14 literStandard Deviation 0.69
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.20 literStandard Deviation 0.41
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.07 literStandard Deviation 0.63
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.88 literStandard Deviation 0.54
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM approach including available FEV1 data from baseline to Week 12 and treatment group as a factor. A step-down procedure was used to strongly control the overall type I error rate for testing multiple doses against placebo. The hierarchy was 300 mg q2w, 200 mg q2w, 300 mg q4w and 200 mg q4w.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.08, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.011, 0.28]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.004895% CI: [0.04, 0.21]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.030495% CI: [0.01, 0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT population: subset of intent to treat (ITT) population (defined as randomized population analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization, regardless of whether the treatment was actually received) which included participants with baseline blood eosinophils \>=0.3 G/L.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline1.86 literStandard Deviation 0.68
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.18 literStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationWeek 122.13 literStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationWeek 122.12 literStandard Deviation 0.54
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline1.77 literStandard Deviation 0.5
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.36 literStandard Deviation 0.46
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationWeek 122.26 literStandard Deviation 0.68
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline1.8 literStandard Deviation 0.52
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.45 literStandard Deviation 0.4
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline1.87 literStandard Deviation 0.6
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.35 literStandard Deviation 0.43
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationWeek 122.26 literStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationWeek 122.09 literStandard Deviation 0.54
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline1.8 literStandard Deviation 0.49
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAbsolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.26 literStandard Deviation 0.47
Comparison: Analysis was performed using mixed effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach including available FEV1 data from baseline to Week 12 and treatment group as a factor. A step-down procedure was used to strongly control the overall type I error rate for testing multiple doses against placebo. The hierarchy was 300 mg q2w, 200 mg q2w, 300 mg q4w, and 200 mg q4w.p-value: 0.006395% CI: [0.06, 0.36]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.000895% CI: [0.11, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.021295% CI: [0.03, 0.32]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.277495% CI: [-0.07, 0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wAnnualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population1.107 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.326 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.347 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.73 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.563 LOAC per participant-year
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population

LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: HEos-ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the HEos-ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population1.312 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.322 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.446 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.788 LOAC per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.424 LOAC per participant-year
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: HEos-ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the HEos-ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population1.044 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.201 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.30 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.678 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT Population0.358 exacerbation per participant-year
Secondary

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.897 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.265 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.269 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.599 exacerbation per participant-year
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wAnnualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT Population0.415 exacerbation per participant-year
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.32 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.49 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline4.12 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 125.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 125.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline3.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 125.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline4.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.19 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline4.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 125.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 125.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline4.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.72 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.20 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.20 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 120.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 125.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline4.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 125.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.54 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline4.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 125.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 125.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.99 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 121.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 125.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.72 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.84 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.62 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.32 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.47 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.47 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.54 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.83 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.66 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline1.18 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 120.63 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT Population

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.23 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.25 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.43 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.46 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 120.72 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline1.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.54 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.88 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.53
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.53 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.77
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.51 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 1.74
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.47 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.31
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.61 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 3.56
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 122.14 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 3.22
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.02 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.85
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.93 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.31
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 122.15 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.67
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline3.15 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.7
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.85 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.75
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.49 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.37
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline2.42 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.75
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.01 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationWeek 121.36 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 1.76
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT Population

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.72 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.73
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.44 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 1.75
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.20 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.57
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.30 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 3.02
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline3.25 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 3.15
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.95 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.05
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.03 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.46
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline2.98 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.74
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.99 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.27
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline3.36 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 3.43
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-1.35 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.84
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 122.09 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.73
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationWeek 121.99 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.42
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline3.01 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.87
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange from baseline at Week 12-0.92 inhalations per dayStandard Deviation 2.16
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: HEos-ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population10.07 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.65
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population25.29 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.15
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population27.42 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.68
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population20.68 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.86
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT Population18.07 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.18
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population7.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.26
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population16.64 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.78
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population19.15 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.53
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population13.55 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.01
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT Population13.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.21
Secondary

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: HEos-ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the HEos-ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.30 probability of LOAC
Placebo q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.392 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.166 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.115 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.113 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.113 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.126 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.207 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.052 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.162 probability of LOAC
Secondary

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT Population

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.258 probability of LOAC
Placebo q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.338 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.112 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.146 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.09 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.112 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.242 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.145 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.096 probability of LOAC
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.209 probability of LOAC
Secondary

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: HEos-ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of the HEos-ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.287 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Placebo q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.21 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.116 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.082 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.082 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.082 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.094 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.175 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.125 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.052 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Secondary

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT Population

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants of ITT population who were treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.266 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Placebo q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.207 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.092 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.112 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.091 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.07 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.112 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.195 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 240.16 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wTime to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationProbability at Week 120.075 probability of Severe Exacerbation
Post Hoc

Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/L

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on subset of ITT population which included participants with baseline blood eosinophil count \<0.3 G/L.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LWeek 121.92 literStandard Deviation 0.61
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LBaseline1.79 literStandard Deviation 0.42
Placebo q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LChange from baseline at Week 120.09 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LBaseline1.9 literStandard Deviation 0.55
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LWeek 122.12 literStandard Deviation 0.63
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LChange from baseline at Week 120.19 literStandard Deviation 0.31
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LChange from baseline at Week 120.23 literStandard Deviation 0.33
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LWeek 122.02 literStandard Deviation 0.67
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LBaseline1.79 literStandard Deviation 0.53
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LWeek 122.05 literStandard Deviation 0.68
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LBaseline1.85 literStandard Deviation 0.56
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LChange from baseline at Week 120.16 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LChange from baseline at Week 120.17 literStandard Deviation 0.36
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LBaseline1.94 literStandard Deviation 0.56
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wChange From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: Subset of ITT Population With Baseline Blood Eosinophil <0.3 G/LWeek 122.06 literStandard Deviation 0.68

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026