Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Trial of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers

A Phase 3 Randomized Safety and Efficacy Trial of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers (EU)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01853384
Enrollment
252
Registered
2013-05-15
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2016-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Ulcer, Venous Stasis Ulcer, Ulcer

Keywords

Venous leg ulcer, ulcer, venous stasis, compression, venous, venous stasis ulcer, vlu, wound, varicose veins, venous insufficiency, dvt, deep vein thrombosis

Brief summary

This study is being done to find out if an investigational product called HP802-247 can help people with venous leg ulcers. Investigational means that HP802-247 has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This research is being done to compare the efficacy of HP802-247 plus compression therapy against Vehicle plus compression therapy in achieving complete wound closure over the 12-week treatment period. Vehicle looks the same as HP802-247 but contains no cells. At least 440 subjects will participate. The study is going to be conducted in approximately 5 countries at approximately 50 sites across the European Union.

Detailed description

See Brief Summary

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHP802-247

Study Dosage / Usage: 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days.

OTHERHP802-247 Vehicle

HP802-247 Vehicle consists of two separate components, a fibrinogen solution (Component 1) and a cell free thrombin solution which is identical to Component 2 except that no keratinocytes and no fibroblasts are present. A single dose is created when combined on the wound surface.

Sponsors

Healthpoint
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide informed consent. * Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex. * Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments. * Have a venous leg ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 12.0 cm2 * Venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination for valvular or venous incompetence. * Arterial supply adequacy confirmed * Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone. * Target ulcer duration ≥ 6 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months). * Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion criteria

* History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B. * Prior diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with elevated anti-DNA antibody titers, Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans), current diagnosis of vasculitis, or current diagnosis of claudication. * Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study. * A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies (e.g., sickle cell anemia, necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum, pyoderma gangrenosum, vasculopathic or vasculitic). * Documented history of osteomyelitis at the target wound location within 6 months preceding the Screening Visit. * Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy. * Therapy of the target ulcer with autologous skin graft, Apligraf™, or Dermagraft™ within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit. * History of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers). * Any prior exposure to HP802-247 or its vehicle.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWeekly, over 12 Weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred firstFor each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. Following initial closure subjects returned for four weekly visits to confirm wound closure. Wounds that remained closed for four weeks were classified as confirmed closures; if a wound opened at any of the 4 visits it was not considered to have closed. For subjects who dropped from the study prior to the end of treatment, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF; wound status of closed was not imputed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.12 weeksThis key secondary outcome was based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis.
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWeekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred firstFor subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF. Treatment groups were compared for percentage of participants with closed wounds at each treatment visit.
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.12 WeeksThis key secondary outcome was based on a Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis.
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment periodTarget ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment periodTarget leg pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Number of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureTarget ulcer status observed at two (visit 1) and three (visit 2) months following initial ulcer closure.Subjects who completed the treatment period with confirmed wound closure were followed in the post-treatment period for a further two months to determine their closed wound status (remained closed/reopened), giving a measure of persistence of wound closure following completion of treatment.

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Poland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were screened at 47 sites in the EU \[Belgium (3), Czech Republic (8), Germany (15), Hungary (8), Poland (13)\] between January 10, 2014 and November 27, 2014; sites included independent and hospital wound clinics and private practice sites.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects entered a 2-week run-in; subjects whose wound radius decreased by \< 0.349 cm/2weeks and met all other inclusion/exclusion (I/E) criteria were eligible for randomization. After completion of the treatment period, subjects entered a three-month follow up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HP802-247 Plus Compression Therapy
HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days for up to 12 weeks or wound closure, which ever occurred first. Subjects randomized to HP802-247 will receive Vehicle on alternate weeks. HP802-247: Study Dosage / Usage: 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days.
131
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression Therapy
fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution without cells. Subjects randomized to HP802-247 Vehicle will receive Vehicle weekly for up to 12 weeks or wound closure, which ever occurred first. HP802-247 Vehicle: HP802-247 Vehicle consists of two separate components, a fibrinogen solution (Component 1) and a cell free thrombin solution which is identical to Component 2 except that no keratinocytes and no fibroblasts are present. A single dose is created when combined on the wound surface.
121
Total252

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Completed Follow up Visit 1Early Termination139
Completed Follow up Visit 1Withdrawal by Subject10
Completed Follow up Visit 2Adverse Event10
Completed Follow up Visit 2Death10
Completed Follow up Visit 2Lost to Follow-up01
Completed Follow up Visit 2Withdrawal by Subject12
RandomizedAdverse Event53
RandomizedDeath12
RandomizedLost to Follow-up11
RandomizedOther33
RandomizedSponsor Decision4734
RandomizedWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyHP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous65.6 years68.1 years66.8 years
Age, Customized
18-39 years
6 participants3 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
6 participants3 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
26 participants20 participants46 participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
40 participants40 participants80 participants
Age, Customized
70+ years
53 participants55 participants108 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
129 Participants120 Participants249 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
131 Participants121 Participants252 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants63 Participants139 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants58 Participants113 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 13164 / 121
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 13112 / 121

Outcome results

Primary

Compare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline

For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. Following initial closure subjects returned for four weekly visits to confirm wound closure. Wounds that remained closed for four weeks were classified as confirmed closures; if a wound opened at any of the 4 visits it was not considered to have closed. For subjects who dropped from the study prior to the end of treatment, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF; wound status of closed was not imputed.

Time frame: Weekly, over 12 Weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWounds Not Closed70 participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWounds Closed61 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWounds Closed61 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWounds Not Closed60 participants
p-value: 0.5348Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks

Target leg pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article. Data were analyzed by an ANCOVA, adjusted for site and baseline score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 02-2.2 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 07-13.1 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 04-10.1 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 08-14.2 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 01-4.1 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 09-10.1 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 05-9.7 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 10-12.7 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 03-9.2 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 11-12.9 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 06-12.2 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 12-14.3 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline24.18 mmStandard Error 27
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 12-12.2 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline22.35 mmStandard Error 16
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 01-4.9 mmStandard Error 2.4
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 02-1.3 mmStandard Error 2.4
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 03-5.3 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 04-8.8 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 05-8.6 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 06-9.1 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 07-8.9 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 08-9.0 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 09-6.3 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 10-11.1 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 11-11.8 mmStandard Error 2.1
p-value: 0.7439ANCOVA
p-value: 0.6992ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0867ANCOVA
p-value: 0.5739ANCOVA
p-value: 0.6497ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1427ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0682ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0161ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0973ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4661ANCOVA
p-value: 0.601ANCOVA
p-value: 0.3369ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks

Target ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale \[Range: 0mm - 100mm\]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article. Data were analyzed by an ANCOVA, adjusted for site and baseline score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 02-10.4 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 07-18.5 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 04-14.3 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 08-20.0 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 01-8.6 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 09-19.7 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 05-17.2 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 10-18.9 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 03-14.0 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 11-19.4 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 06-17.8 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 12-20.0 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline29.40 mmStandard Error 28.5
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 12-20.1 mmStandard Error 2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksBaseline26.30 mmStandard Error 28.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 01-7.5 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 02-11.0 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 03-10.7 mmStandard Error 2.4
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 04-12.1 mmStandard Error 2.3
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 05-13.6 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 06-15.4 mmStandard Error 2.2
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 07-17.5 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 08-17.1 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 09-17.9 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 10-18.4 mmStandard Error 2.1
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyChange From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment WeeksWeek 11-19.7 mmStandard Error 2.1
p-value: 0.5909ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8234ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1556ANCOVA
p-value: 0.3487ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1064ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2888ANCOVA
p-value: 0.6095ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1566ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4216ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8166ANCOVA
p-value: 0.9114ANCOVA
p-value: 0.9733ANCOVA
Secondary

Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.

This key secondary outcome was based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis, with significance being at P \< 0.05.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.64 days
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.57 days
Secondary

Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.

This key secondary outcome was based on a Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article. Data were analyzed using the Cox Proportional hazard procedure, with significance being at P \< 0.05.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.57.0 days
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.50.0 days
p-value: 0.9456Regression, Cox
Secondary

Compare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline

For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF. Treatment groups were compared for percentage of participants with closed wounds at each treatment visit.

Time frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

Population: ITT Populations: Subjects who received at least one dose of test article. Analysis was by the Cochrane Mantel Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for sites, with significance being at P \< 0.05

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1141.2 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineBaseline0 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 012.3 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 028.4 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0313.7 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0422.1 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0526.7 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0629.8 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0732.8 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0837.4 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0938.9 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1040.5 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1248.1 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWeek 12 - Primary Endpoint46.6 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0943.8 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1147.9 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0638.0 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineBaseline0 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1253.7 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 013.3 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0739.7 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 027.4 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 1046.3 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0318.2 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0839.7 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0425.6 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineWeek 12 - Primary Endpoint50.4 percentage of participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyCompare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From BaselineTreatment Week 0533.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.6194Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.793Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.3362Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.5263Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.1997Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.1617Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.2611Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.7232Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.4405Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.3516Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.2821Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.3722Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.5348Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound Closure

Subjects who completed the treatment period with confirmed wound closure were followed in the post-treatment period for a further two months to determine their closed wound status (remained closed/reopened), giving a measure of persistence of wound closure following completion of treatment.

Time frame: Target ulcer status observed at two (visit 1) and three (visit 2) months following initial ulcer closure.

Population: Due to study termination the data available to assess durability of closure were limited to only the subjects who completed at least one of the follow-up visits. Participants who had CLOSED wounds at completion of treatment; 103 subjects (HP802-247: 49; Vehicle: 54) completed Visit 18, 114 subjects (HP802-247: 57; Vehicle: 57) completed Visit 19

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 1 (wounds remained closed)45 participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 1 (wounds reopened)4 participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 2 (wounds remained closed)51 participants
HP802-247 Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 2 (wounds reopened)6 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 2 (wounds reopened)10 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 1 (wounds remained closed)52 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 2 (wounds remained closed)47 participants
HP802-247 Vehicle Plus Compression TherapyNumber of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound ClosureFollow-up Visit 1 (wounds reopened)2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026