Skip to content

Pharmacodynamic Effect of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Diabetes

A Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01852214
Enrollment
50
Registered
2013-05-13
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus, Coronary artery disease, prasugrel, ticagrelor

Brief summary

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of adverse atherothrombotic events. This may be in part attributed to the fact that these patients have reduced response to oral antiplatelet medications, in particular the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor clopidogrel, used for secondary prevention of ischemic events. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors which, compared with clopidogrel, have more potent antiplatelet effects. Head-to-head comparisons between the two drugs are lacking.

Detailed description

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of adverse atherothrombotic events. This may be in part attributed to the fact that these patients have reduced response to oral antiplatelet medications, in particular the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor clopidogrel, used for secondary prevention of ischemic events. Upregulation of platelet P2Y12 receptor mediated signaling has been shown in DM patients and may contribute to these pharmacodynamic observations, suggesting the need for more potent P2Y12 inhibiting strategies in these patients. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors which, compared with clopidogrel, have more potent antiplatelet effects. Therefore, prasugrel and ticagrelor represent attractive treatment options for patients with DM. This is also supported by the DM sub-group analysis of the pivotal TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) and PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trials, which have led to approval of prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. Although results of these sub-group analysis suggest that prasugrel is associated with an enhanced benefit in DM patients, while ticagrelor effects in DM patients are consistent with the overall study population, only head-to-head comparisons between the two drugs can elucidate if these exert differential effects on platelets from DM patients. However, the pharmacodynamic studies comparing prasugrel with ticagrelor in DM patients are lacking. The ever growing DM population at high risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events underscores the need to define antiplatelet treatment strategies leading to more optimal platelet inhibition in these patients.

Interventions

DRUGPrasugrel

Patients receiving prasugrel will be treated with 60mg loading dose and 10mg maintenance dose

DRUGTicagrelor

Patients receiving ticagrelor will be treated with a 180mg loading dose and 90mg bid maintenance dose

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with known (angiographically documented) CAD. * On maintenance treatment with aspirin (81 mg per day) for at least 1-month as per standard of care. * Type 2 DM on treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin. * Age between 18 and 74 years old.

Exclusion criteria

* History of stroke, transient ischemic attack or intracranial bleeding. * On treatment with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor). * Known allergies to aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor. * Weight \<60kg. * On treatment with oral anticoagulant (Vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran). * Blood dyscrasia or bleeding diathesis. * Platelet count \<80x106/mL. * Hemoglobin \<10 g/dL. * Active bleeding or hemodynamic instability. * Creatinine Clearance \<30 mL/minute. * Baseline ALT \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal. * Hb A1c ≥ 10 mg/dL within 3 months. * Patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high degree AV block without pacemaker protection. * Drugs interfering CYP3A4 metabolism (to avoid interaction with Ticagrelor): Ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, and telithromizycin. * Pregnant females\*. * Women of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives) while participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
P2Y12 Reaction Units1 weekThe primary endpoint is the comparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Treatment effects were evaluated comparing PRU observed in the overall patient population after prasugrel treatment with those achieved after ticagrelor regardless of the sequence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
P2Y12 Reaction Units2 hoursComparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel)
Platelet Reactivity Index1 weekThe comparison of the platelet reactivity index (PRI) values determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). VASP was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies. A low PRI is indicative of high platelet inhibition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between February 2013 and July 2015, a total of 61 subjects agreed to participate in the study; 11 subjects were excluded and thus a total of 50 subjects were randomized (prasugrel first n=26; ticagrelor first n=24).

Pre-assignment details

11 subjects were excluded before randomization: withdrawn of consent (n=4), screen failure (n=4), unable to draw blood (n=3).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Population
Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease
46
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Adverse Event12
Period 1Withdrawal by Subject01
Washout PeriodWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Population
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants
Type of diabetes
Insulin-dependent
26 participants
Type of diabetes
Non-insulin-dependent
20 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 4610 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

P2Y12 Reaction Units

The primary endpoint is the comparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Treatment effects were evaluated comparing PRU observed in the overall patient population after prasugrel treatment with those achieved after ticagrelor regardless of the sequence.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: All analyses of platelet function conducted on all randomized subjects who received study drug, successfully completed at least one treatment period of the study and had valid data for the primary end point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PrasugrelP2Y12 Reaction Units83 PRU
TicagrelorP2Y12 Reaction Units52 PRU
p-value: 0.022Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

P2Y12 Reaction Units

Comparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel)

Time frame: 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PrasugrelP2Y12 Reaction Units97 PRU
TicagrelorP2Y12 Reaction Units75 PRU
p-value: 0.086Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Platelet Reactivity Index

The comparison of the platelet reactivity index (PRI) values determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). VASP was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies. A low PRI is indicative of high platelet inhibition.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PrasugrelPlatelet Reactivity Index36 PRI
TicagrelorPlatelet Reactivity Index36 PRI
Secondary

Platelet Reactivity Index

The comparison of the platelet reactivity index (PRI) values determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). VASP was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies. A low PRI is indicative of high platelet inhibition.

Time frame: 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PrasugrelPlatelet Reactivity Index35 PRI
TicagrelorPlatelet Reactivity Index37 PRI

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026