Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A; BOTOX®) for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity in participants who successfully completed Study 191622-120 (NCT01852045).
Interventions
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the detrusor wall. Treatments were administered as needed with a minimum of a 12-week interval between doses.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Successfully completed participation in Study 191622-120 * Aged ≥ 5 years to ≤ 17 years at the time of entry into Study 191622-120 * Regularly using clean intermittent catheterization to empty the bladder
Exclusion criteria
* Myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis * Current or planned use of a baclofen pump * Current or planned use of an electrostimulation/neuromodulation device for urinary incontinence * Use of an indwelling catheter for urinary incontinence instead of using clean intermittent catheterization to empty the bladder * Previous or current use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition, or treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any other condition since entering study 191622-120
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2 | The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3 | The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks) | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to medicinal (investigational) product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that resulted in death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event. A TEAE or STEAE is defined as any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of treatment. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycles. |
| Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment | First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks) | Time to request for re-treatment is the time in weeks between last injection and request for next injection, regardless of fulfillment of the re-treatment criteria. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study. Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose. |
| Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment | First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks) | The criteria for qualification of retreatment included 1) Participant/parent/caregiver requests retreatment; 2) Participant has a total of at least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes over the 2-day bladder diary collection period; 3) At least 12 weeks has elapsed since treatment 1 and 4) Participant has not experienced a serious treatment-related adverse event at any time. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study. Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose. |
| Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1 | Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2 | The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3 | The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Italy, Poland, Turkey (Türkiye), United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants who successfully completed Study 191622-120 (NCT01852045) were enrolled in this study and were followed for up to an additional 60 weeks.
Pre-assignment details
Data from the participant's participation in this extension Study 191622-121 (121) were integrated with the corresponding participant's data from the preceding Study 191622-120 (120).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 50 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in Study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments. Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg). | 31 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 100 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in Study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments. Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg). | 39 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 200 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in Study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments. Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg). | 25 |
| Total | 95 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 | FG008 | FG009 | FG010 | FG011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1, Occurred in Study 120 | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Protocol Deviation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Reason not Specified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle2:Retreatment 1,Study 121 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle3:Retreatment 2,Study 121 | Reason Not Specified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment Cycle3:Retreatment 2,Study 121 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U | OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U | OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 11.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.49 | 10.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.36 | 11.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22 | 11.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.36 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 22 Participants | 28 Participants | 18 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants | 14 Participants | 13 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 25 Participants | 12 Participants | 51 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 31 | 0 / 39 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 45 | 0 / 36 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 16 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 21 / 31 | 31 / 39 | 16 / 25 | 7 / 9 | 32 / 45 | 27 / 36 | 4 / 5 | 10 / 16 | 19 / 34 | 3 / 3 | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 31 | 3 / 39 | 1 / 25 | 0 / 9 | 5 / 45 | 6 / 36 | 0 / 5 | 1 / 16 | 2 / 34 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 |
Outcome results
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into the extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of the total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Baseline | 2.66 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.876 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.19 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.156 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Baseline | 2.97 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.135 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.39 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.585 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Baseline | 3.99 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 5.492 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -2.19 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 5.738 |
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into the extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of the total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Baseline | 2.57 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.937 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.07 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 2.092 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Baseline | 2.80 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.915 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.70 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.331 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Baseline | 3.83 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 4.623 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.64 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.906 |
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into the extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of the total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Baseline | 2.48 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.228 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.92 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.858 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Baseline | 2.94 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 0.923 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -1.73 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.057 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Baseline | 3.80 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 4.678 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | Change from Baseline to Week 6 | -2.74 urinary incontinence episodes per day | Standard Deviation 4.833 |
Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment
The criteria for qualification of retreatment included 1) Participant/parent/caregiver requests retreatment; 2) Participant has a total of at least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes over the 2-day bladder diary collection period; 3) At least 12 weeks has elapsed since treatment 1 and 4) Participant has not experienced a serious treatment-related adverse event at any time. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study. Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose.
Time frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment | 25.38 weeks |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment | 25.43 weeks |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment | 26.29 weeks |
Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment
Time to request for re-treatment is the time in weeks between last injection and request for next injection, regardless of fulfillment of the re-treatment criteria. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study. Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose.
Time frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment | 24.55 weeks |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment | 24.64 weeks |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment | 25.43 weeks |
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1 | 14.68 mL | Standard Deviation 88.146 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1 | 39.88 mL | Standard Deviation 72.787 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1 | 96.90 mL | Standard Deviation 120.429 |
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2 | 7.92 mL | Standard Deviation 148.597 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2 | 79.53 mL | Standard Deviation 106.794 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2 | 35.34 mL | Standard Deviation 98.209 |
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit. The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3 | 58.50 mL | Standard Deviation 22.749 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3 | 57.86 mL | Standard Deviation 74.762 |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3 | 92.39 mL | Standard Deviation 147.322 |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to medicinal (investigational) product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that resulted in death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event. A TEAE or STEAE is defined as any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of treatment. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycles.
Time frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into the extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of the total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 23 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 2 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 31 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 3 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 19 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 1 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 7 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 0 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 5 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 34 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 31 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 2) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 6 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 0 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 4 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 10 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 1 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 21 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 3) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 2 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 3 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 0 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 0 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | STEAEs | 0 Participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 4) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs) | TEAEs | 4 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data for the specific category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 53.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 30.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 27.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 30.6 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 41.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 26.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 39.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 30.4 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 52.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data for the specific category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 65.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 27.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 43.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 38.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline to Week 6 | 58.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period). Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night. The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received at least 1 BOTOX treatment over the course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data for the specific category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥100% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 30.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥75% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 39.4 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥90% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 | ≥50% Reduction from Baseline at Week 6 | 69.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>= 1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 30.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 12.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 87.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 45.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 15.4 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 16.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 37.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 45.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 29.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 4.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 78.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>= 1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 43.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 8.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 22.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 84.4 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 23.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 8.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 67.6 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 8.8 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 85.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine. Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit. Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day. The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>= 1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period, starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 56.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 31.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 21.2 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Baseline | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Week 6 | 51.5 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 1 Night of Incontinence at Week 6 | 27.3 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 0 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3 | 2 Nights of Incontinence at Baseline | 88.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period,starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1 | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1 | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1 | 75.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period,starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2 | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2 | 97.6 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2 | 83.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either greatly improved or improved. Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
Time frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: BOTOX-treated Population included all participants enrolled into extension study who received \>=1 BOTOX treatment over course of total evaluation period,starting from their first treatment in Study 120. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3 | 100 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3 | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U (Treatment Cycle 1) | Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3 | 84.8 percentage of participants |