Skip to content

RCT of Stent Versus Standard Therapy in Oesophageal Variceal Haemorrhage

Effective Haemostasis Using Self-expandable Covered Mesh-metal Oesophageal Stents Versus Standard Endoscopic Therapy in the Treatment of Oesophageal Variceal Haemorrhage: A Multicentre, Open, Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01851564
Acronym
SOV
Enrollment
14
Registered
2013-05-10
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2016-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Bleeding Esophageal Varices

Keywords

Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage, Varices, Liver Cirrhosis, Stent

Brief summary

The mortality rates from Acute Variceal Haemorrhage remain significant and first line therapy may fail in 15-25% of patients. The self-expandable metal stent has been described in case series as having a very high efficacy at control of haemorrhage from oesophageal varices when used as rescue therapy. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess for any potential superiority of the stent over 'standard' endoscopic techniques as primary or rescue therapy for bleeding oesophageal varices.

Detailed description

Despite improvements in recent years, mortality from variceal bleeding remains significant. The routine use of banding ligation, vasoactive drugs, and antibiotics has had an impact on survival rates such that survival rates of patients with Childs-Pugh A and B class cirrhosis may be as high as 90% at 30 days. However, the successful outcome of variceal bleeding is compromised in some patients because of initial failure to control bleeding or early re-bleeding, both of which have a significant impact on mortality. The SX-Ella Danis stent (Ella-CS, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic) is a removable, covered, self-expanding mesh-metal stent (SEMS) that can be deployed in the lower oesophagus over an endoscopically placed guidewire without radiological screening. The stent controls bleeding by tamponade of varices in the lower oesophagus. The series reported to date suggest that the self-expandable covered stents can provide 100% haemostasis rates when applied for refractory oesophageal variceal bleeding. Given the potentially lower risks of re-bleeding and safe, easy insertion techniques the self-expandable covered stents may offer a superior alternative to standard endoscopic therapy.

Interventions

DEVICESelf-expanding mesh-metal oesophageal stent (SEMS)

A removable stent designed for the treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices.

OTHERStandard Therapy

Standard Medical and Endoscopic Therapy

Sponsors

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Barts & The London NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Arm 1: Participants with Child-Pugh grade B or C cirrhosis with variceal haemorrhage, where the bleeding is from a site which would ordinarily be treated with band ligation . The diagnosis of cirrhosis may be proven by previous histology or suspected using clinical, radiological and biochemical data. * Arm 2: Participants with Child-Pugh grade A, B or C cirrhosis who present with failure to control bleeding within 5 days of an initial attempt at standard endoscopic therapy of acute haemorrhage from a site which would ordinarily be treated with band ligation.

Exclusion criteria

* \< 18 Years of age * Child-Pugh grade A cirrhosis (for Arm 1 only) * Varices which would not be treated with band ligation as standard therapy * Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension * Malignancy of the oesophagus, stomach or upper respiratory tract * Oesophageal stenosis which prohibits endoscopy * Recent oesophageal surgery * A large hiatus hernia which prevents stent placement * Known hepatocellular carcinoma considered to be incurable (according to Milan Criteria) * Patients in the terminal phases of hepatological or other disease * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure to Control Bleeding7 daysFailure to control Bleeding (as defined by the Baveno V Criteria) or re-bleeding within 7 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absence of Bleeding at 14 and 42 days14 and 42 days
Participant Survival7, 14, 42 days and 6 months
Absence of Stent Migration7 daysfor the duration of stent migration
Requirement for Blood products7 days
Presence of Thoracic Pain or Dysphagia7 days
Length of Intensive Care Unit and Total Hospital StayTotal Length of Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Stay (an average of 3 and 10 days respectively)
Requirement for additional endoscopic therapy or salvage therapy (such as TIPS)7 days
Repeated presentation with variceal bleeding within 6 months6 months
Requirement for Analgesia and Sedation whilst Stent in in situ7 days

Other

MeasureTime frame
Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Effect6 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026