Skip to content

Effectiveness Intraarticular Corticosteroid

Effectiveness and Tolerance Infiltration Intraarticular Corticosteroid According to Dose

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01851278
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-05-10
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2013-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

injection, arthritis, corticosteroid

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the small and large dose of corticosteroid used in intraarticular injection of wrist.

Detailed description

Background / Objectives: The optimal dose of corticosteroid to be used in intraarticular injection is not well established. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and tolerance in the medium-term between small and large dose of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) used in intraarticular injection (IAI) of medium size joint of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials/Methods: A controlled, randomized, prospective, double-blind study will be realized in patients with RA. It will be evaluated 60 wrists joints (representing medium size joints) from the outpatient clinics at the Rheumatology Division UNIFESP, Brazil. Inclusion criteria were: patients with established RA, age between 18 and 65 years, disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) stable for at least 3 months, synovitis in wrist with pain visual analogic scale (VAS) between 4 and 8cm. Patients with overlap syndromes, polyarticular synovitis, diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled hypertension and those with suspected local or systemic infection were excluded. Patients will be randomized (Clapboard randomization) in two groups of 30 patients each: group 1 (high dose) is injected with 40mg (2ml) of TH and group 2 (small dose) was injected 20mg (1ml). Only one joint is injected by patient (IAI blindly). Evaluation will be conducted by a blinded observer at five times: baseline (T0), one week (T1), four (T4), eight (T8) and twelve (T12) weeks and the following assessment instruments were used: visual analogue scale for pain and swollen (VAS 0-10cm); wrist goniometry; chronic disease activity index (CDAI). Side effects and related events were reported in a medical questionnaire. The level of statistical significance was 5%.

Interventions

High dose means 40mg or 2ml of triamcinolone hexacetonide

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Federal University of São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with established RA * age between 18 and 65 years * disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) stable for at least 3 months * synovitis in wrist with pain visual analogic scale (VAS) between 4 and 8cm

Exclusion criteria

* patients with overlap syndromes * polyarticular synovitis * diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled hypertension and those with suspected local or systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analog scale (VAS)up to 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
chronic disease activity index (CDAI)up to 12 weeks

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026