Skip to content

Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Lumbar Radiculopathy

A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01850771
Enrollment
8
Registered
2013-05-09
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2016-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disc Degeneration, Herniated Disc, Radiculopathy

Keywords

Lumbar Radiculopathy, Disc bulge, Disc herniation, Disc degeneration

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for Regenexx PL-Disc vs. steroid epidural for treatment of lumbar radiculopathy, from baseline to 3 months, with continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 12 months. Secondary objectives include incidence of post-operative complications, adverse events, re-injections, and surgical intervention; change in pain score and use of pain medications.

Detailed description

Prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled to include 25 subjects treated with Regenexx PL-Disc and 25 subjects treated with steroid epidural injection with the steroid epidural group crossing over to the PL-Disc injection group at 3 months. Subjects will have symptoms consistent with lumbar radiculopathy confirmed by physical examination. Subjects will be enrolled within 60 days prior to injection and take part in follow-up visits for one year following treatment. A preoperative visit will occur at the time of enrollment; follow-up visits will occur at the clinical site at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post injection. Subjects will remain blinded to the treatment allocation through at least the 3 month primary endpoint. Control subjects not improving after the 3 month visit will be unblinded and given the opportunity to cross-over to the PL-Disc group. Subjects will complete the study following the 1 year follow-up visit.

Interventions

PROCEDURERegenexx PL-Disc

Injection into the epidural space under image guidance of autologous, concentrated peripheral blood based platelet mix combined with a nanogram dose of corticosteroid.

PROCEDURESteroid Epidural

Injection into the epidural space under image guidance of 3 mg of betamethasone.

Sponsors

Regenexx, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pain, spasm, or functional disability in the low back and diagnosed as radiculopathy having failed conservative treatment (e.g. NSAIDs, physician initiated physical therapy) for at least 3 months and not longer than 2 years * Significant functional disability related to pain, lack of strength, or other back or leg symptoms * Physical examination consistent with lumbar radiculopathy * Lumbar disc bulge, herniation, and/or Kader grade 2 or greater multifidus atrophy evident on MRI and consistent with physical exam findings * Is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic central or foraminal stenosis * Previous low back surgery * Prior epidural steroid injection or other low back injection therapy within the past year * \>50% loss of disc height at the symptomatic level * Spondylolisthesis * Inflammatory or auto-immune based pathology (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia, polymyositis, gout pseudogout) * Quinolone or Statin induced myopathy/tendinopathy * Severe neurogenic inflammation of the cutaneous nerves * Condition represents a worker's compensation case * Currently involved in a health-related litigation procedure * Is pregnant * Bleeding disorders * Currently taking anticoagulant or immunosuppressive medication * Allergy or intolerance to study medication * Use of chronic opioid, * Documented history of drug abuse within six months of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index Change from BaselineChange from baseline to 3 monthsThe primary endpoint for this study is the difference between treatment groups in the within patient mean change from baseline to 3 months in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean ODI scores6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsDifference between treatment groups in mean ODI scores at each follow-up timepoint
Mean Pain Scales6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsDifference between treatment groups in mean 0-10 pain scales at each follow-up timepoint
Incidence of Complications and Adverse Events12 monthsIncidence of post-operative complications and adverse events between treatment groups.
Mean Functional Rating Index Scores6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsDifference between treatment groups in mean Functional Rating Index (FRI) scores at each follow-up timepoint.
Use of pain medications6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsDifference between treatment groups in use of pain medications at each follow-up timepoint
Time to Resolution of Complications and Adverse Events12 monthsTime to resolution of post-operative complications and adverse events between treatment groups.
Time to re-injection/re-operation12 monthsTime to re-injection and surgical operation between treatment groups.
Incidence of re-injection/re-operation12 monthsIncidence of re-injection and surgical operation between treatment groups.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026